Factors related to a good quality of work life for employees in a poultry processing industry in northeastern Thailand.

Authors

  • Sirintip Boonjaraspinyo Department of Community Medicine, Family Medicine, and Occupational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Thailand https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5380-3681
  • Janthimard Mornmee Department of Community Medicine, Family Medicine, and Occupational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Thailand
  • Warisa Soonthornvinit Department of Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Thailand https://orcid.org/0009-0002-5831-9375
  • Naesinee Chaiear Department of Community Medicine, Family Medicine, and Occupational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Thailand https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9295-6760

Keywords:

quality of work life, poultry processing industry, work- related quality of life scale, slaughtering

Abstract

Objective  This study aims to analyze factors related to a good quality of work life (QoWL) for employees in the poultry processing industry in northeastern Thailand.

Methods  This study was a cross-sectional analytical study. The sample size was 229 poultry processing workers with good and 458 with not-good QoWL. The Work-related Quality of Life Scale-2 Online Website (THQWL) questionnaire was used.  A test of the reliability of the questionnaire found a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.899. The principal analyses used the Chi-squared test, the Fisher exact test, and binary logistic regression. Confidence intervals were set at 95% (95% CI), and a p-value of less than 0.05 (p < 0.05) was considered statistically significant.

Results Factors significantly related to employees with a good QoWL were working in departments other than slaughtering departments (AOR = 15.58, 95% CI: 7.62, 31.83, p < 0.001), having less than a bachelor’s degree education level (AOR = 6.65, 95%  CI: 3.05, 14.49, p < 0.001), being a unit leader or in an upper level position (AOR = 7.26, 95% CI: 3.30, 15.98, p < 0.001) and working 40 or more hours per week (AOR= 1.92, 95% CI: 1.17, 3.16, p = 0.010). 

Conclusions Not working in the slaughtering department showed the strongest association with good QoWL. Other factors significantly linked to good QoWL included an education level lower than a bachelor’s degree, holding positions as unit leaders or in upper management, and working 40 hours or more per week. The study’s findings can be applied to enhance and promote the QoWL of workers in the poultry processing and related industries as well as to help improve and reinforce the knowledge, skills, and other attributes important to the efficient performance of employees in the poultry processing industry. 

References

Ipsos Business Consulting. Thailand’s poultry industry. Bangkok: Ipsos; 2023.

Kornboontritos S. Industry outlook 2023-2025: chilled, frozen and processed chicken industry [Internet]. 2023 [cited 2024 Feb 12]. Available from: https://www.krungsri.com/en/research/industry/industry-outlook/food-beverage/frozen-processed-chicken/io/io-chilled-frozen-processed-chicken

World Health Organization. Talk about depression, strengthen depression-related services [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2024 Feb 12]. Available from: https://www.who.int/southeastasia/news/detail/06-04-2017-talk-about-depression-strengthen-depression-related-services-who

Melchior M, Caspi A, Milne BJ, Danese A, Poulton R, Moffitt T. Work stress precipitates depression and anxiety in young, working women and men. Psychol Med. 2007;37:1119-29.

Harmse JL, Engelbrecht JC, Bekker JL. The impact of physical and ergonomic hazards on poultry abattoir processing workers: a review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016;13:197. PubMed PMID: 26861374

International Human Rights Standards and U.S. Law. Worker health and safety in the meat and poultry industry [Internet]. 2005 [cited 2020 Jan 10]. Available from: https://www.hrw.org/reports/2005/usa0105/4.htm

Health, Safety & Environment. ISO 45001 health and safety management standard [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2024 April 12]. Available from: https://www.hse.gov.uk/managing/management-system/iso45001.htm

Armstrong TJ, Foulke JA, Joseph BS, Goldstein SA. Investigation of cumulative trauma disorders in a poultry processing plant. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1982;43:103-16.

World Health Organization. Comprehensive Mental Health Action Plan 2013–2030 [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2024 April 12]. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240031029

Sojka L. Specification of the quality of work life characteristics in the Slovak economic environment. Sociologia. 2014;46:283-99.

Sinha D, Sinha S, Sarangi PK. A study of influence of demographic variables on quality of work life (QWL). J Inf Optim Sci. 2022;43:1179-90.

Rombaut E, Guerry MA. Determinants of voluntary turnover: a data-driven analysis for blue and white collar workers. Work. 2021;69:1083-101.

Chen C, Perry P, Yang Y, Yang C. Decent work in the Chinese apparel industry: comparative analysis of blue-collar and white-collar garment workers. Sustainability. 2017;9:1344.

Kuster AT, Kuster AC, Klaiklang R. Self-representations of quality of life and anxiety of blue-collar workers, Khon Kaen, Thailand. J Health Res. 2015;29:449-56.

Auttanate N, Chotiphan C, Maruo SJ, Nayha S, Jussila K, Rissanen S, et al. Cold-related symptoms and performance degradation among Thai poultry industry workers with reference to vulnerable groups: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2020;20: 1357. PubMed PMID: 32887559

Kookittimaitri P. Factors affecting quality of work life and performance efficiency: a case study of a food factory in Nakornratchasima province [Independent Study]. Bangkok: Graduate College of Management, Sripatum University; 2015. [in Thai]

Choosuwan J. Factors influencing the quality of working life and happiness at work of daily employees in a frozen seafood industry in Songkhla province [Thesis]. Songkhla: Graduate School, Prince of Songkla University; 2016. [in Thai]

Kitirath P, Karnjanapokin K. Quality of work life management among food factory employees in Bang Bua Thong district. J Multidiscip Humanit Soc Sci. 2020;3: 29-38. [in Thai]

Soonthornvinit W, Chaiear N, Boonjaraspinyo S, Tiamkao S. Working hours related to good quality of work life (QoWL) among doctors working in public hospitals in northeastern Thailand. J Med Assoc Thai. 2019;102(Supplement_1):S47-S54.

Chaiear N, Saikaew K, Soonthornvinit W, Sirisawasd P. User manual of the THAI version of a work-related quality of life scale-version 2 and work-related quality of life scale-2 online website. Khon Kaen: Khon Kaen University; 2016.

Hosmer D, Lemeshow S. Multiple logistic regression. In: Applied logistic regression. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley; 2000. p. 31-46.

Slade J, Alleyne E. The psychological impact of slaughterhouse employment: a systematic literature review. Trauma Violence Abuse. 2023;24:429-40.

Victor K, Barnard A. Slaughtering for a living: a hermeneutic phenomenological perspective on the well-being of slaughterhouse employees. Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2016;11:30266. PubMed PMID: 27104340

International Labour Organization. Almost half of Thai workers are putting in “excessive” hours, New ILO study finds [Internet]. 2007 [cited 2024 Feb 12]. Available from: https://www.ilo.org/asia/media-centre/news/WCMS_BK_PR_198_EN/lang--en/index.htm

Office of Permanent Secretary, Ministry of Labor. Employee-Employer rights [Internet]. n.d. [cited 2024 Feb 12]. Available from: https://lb.mol.go.th/en/employee-rights [in Thai]

Holly S, Mohnen A. Impact of working hours on work-life balance. Berlin: German Institute for Economic Research; 2012.

Anbari Z, Abbasinia M, Khadem M, Rahmani A, Asghari M, Nezhad IA, et al. Effects of the quality of working life on job satisfaction in an auto parts manufacturing factory. Int J Emerg Ment Health. 2015;17:151-5.

Tangchuang P, Rupavijetra P. Quality of working life: a case of workers in an electronic factory [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2024 Feb 12]. Available from: http://bsris.swu.ac.th/iprc/4th/20.pdf

Gander F, Hofmann J, Ruch W. Character strengths: person-environment fit and relationships with job and life satisfaction. Front Psychol. 2020;11:1582. PubMed PMID: 32793038

Taris T, Feij J, Capel S. Great expectations–and what comes of it: The effects of unmet expectations on work motivation and outcomes among newcomers. Int J Select Assess. 2006;14:256-68.

Phanprasit W, Konthonbut P, Laohaudomchok W, Tangtong C, Ikäheimo TM, Jaakkola J, et al. Workplace cold and perceived work ability: paradoxically greater disadvantage for more vs. less-educated poultry industry workers in Thailand. Front Public Health. 2021;9:762533. PubMed PMID: 34926385

Waghmare S, Dhole V. Quality of work life and influencing factors. Int J Adv Res. 2017;5:1328-32.

Krommuang A, Lertthaitrakul W. Employees’quality of work life in Bangkok, Thailand. Sripatum Chonburi J. 2020;16:1-14.

Van Laar D, Edwards JA, Easton S. The Work-Related Quality of Life scale for healthcare workers. J Adv Nurs. 2007;60:325-33.

Abadi RR, Nursyamsi I, Syamsuddin AR. Effect of quality of work-life and employee engagement towards job satisfaction and employee performances at PT. Global Sci J. 2020;8:2527-39.

American Psychological Association. Occupational stress and employee control [Internet]. 2003 [cited 2024 Feb 12]. Available from: https://www.apa.org/topics/healthy-workplaces/employee-control-stress

Hofstede G. The cultural relativity of the quality of life concept. Acad Manage Rev. 1984;9:389-98.

Downloads

Published

2024-06-14

How to Cite

1.
Boonjaraspinyo S, Mornmee J, Soonthornvinit W, Chaiear N. Factors related to a good quality of work life for employees in a poultry processing industry in northeastern Thailand. BSCM [Internet]. 2024 Jun. 14 [cited 2024 Nov. 21];63(3):136-45. Available from: https://he01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/CMMJ-MedCMJ/article/view/269595

Issue

Section

Original Article