A pilot evaluation of the online rabies exposure reporting system (R36) and post-exposure rabies immunization in clinical practice in selected hospitals in the upper north of Thailand in fiscal year 2016
Keywords:
rabies, report evaluation, clinical practice, risk factors, post exposure prophylaxisAbstract
Objectives The study aimed to evaluate the online rabies exposure reporting system (R36) and rabies post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) in clinical practice.
Methods A cross-sectional pilot study was conducted in Wiang Kaen, Chiang Khong and Song Khwae Hospitals during mid-January 2017. Records for the 2016 fiscal year were reviewed and stakeholders were interviewed. Quantitative and qualitative attributes of the reports were evaluated. The administration of rabies PEP was also evaluated including the percentage rate of non-compliance with the Thai-CPG for rabies guidelines 2016 and pitfalls in actual practice. A few factors associated with the pitfalls were selected for analysis by multivariate logistic regression.
Results Only the Wiang Kaen and Chiang Khong Hospitals used the online R36 reporting system. Ratings of the sensitivity, completeness and validity of the online R36 reports were 73.08%, 98.25% and 70.18%, respectively, for Wiang Kaen Hospital and 37.12%, 73.47% and 36.73% for Chiang Khong Hospital. The median time from the first dose to submission of the online report was 91 days in Wiang Kaen Hospital and 38 days in Chiang Khong Hospital. The rates of inappropriate PEP, i.e.under- or over-dosage of rabies vaccination/immunoglobulin injections, were 34.62%, 55.30% and 44.44% in the Wiangkaen, Chiang Khong and Song Khwae Hospitals, respectively. Factors associated with non-compliance with the guidelines occurred most frequently in 13-18 years old patients, head and neck injuries, laceration wounds and no history of previous adequate rabies vaccination.
Conclusion The time to report in Wiang Kaen Hospital and the quality of the reports (sensitivity, completeness and validity) in Chiang Khong Hospital needed improvement. Overall, the incidence of inappropriate PEP was high for this fatal disease, indicating a need for physicians and health care teams to pay closer attention to patients who have the risk factors.
References
Fooks AR, Banyard AC, Horton DL, Johnson N, McElhinney LM, Jackson AC. Current status of rabies and prospects for elimination. Lancet. 2014;384(9951):1389-99.
World Health Organization, World Organization for Animal Health, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Global Alliance for Rabies Control. Zero by 30: the Global Strategic Plan to end human deaths from dog-mediated rabies by 2030. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2018.
WHO Expert Consultation on Rabies: third report. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2018.
Hampson K, Coudeville L, Lembo T, Sambo M, Kieffer A, Attlan M et al. Estimating the global burden of endemic canine rabies. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015;9: e0003709.
Knobel DL, Cleaveland S, Coleman PG, Fèvre EM, Meltzer MI, Miranda MEG et al. Re-evaluating the burden of rabies in Africa and Asia. Bull World Health Organ. 2005;83:360-8.
Hinojoy S, Poonkesorn S, Kongyu S, Chuknum T, Kumphon P, Choomkasien P. Guideline for surveillance, prevention and control of rabies in Thailand, 2018: based on epidemiological data. Weekly Epidemiological Surveillance Report. 2018;49:161-3.
Her Royal Highness Princess Chulabhorn Mahidol. The strategic plan of Animal free of rabies; Human are safe from the disease project 2017-2020 (Internet). 2017 (cited 2020 June 01). Available from: http://r36.ddc.moph.go.th/r36/document/view/19/135.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Updated guidelines for evaluating public health surveillance systems: recommendations from the Guidelines Working Group. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Review. Recommendation and Reports. 2001.
Department of Disease Control, Thai Ministry of Public Health. Clinical Practice Guideline for rabies and frequently asked questions. 5th ed. Bangkok: Aksorn Graphic and Design Publishing House; 2016.
World Health Organization. Rabies Vaccines: WHO Position Paper -April 2018. Weekly Epidemiological Record, No. 16; 2018, 93. 201-20.
Permanent Secretary of Thai Ministry of Public Health. Informing the change of Clinical Practice Guideline for rabies. The official letter of Thai Ministry of Public Health to all Provincial Public Health Medical Doctor on 2 May 2018.
Vora NM, Clippard JR, Stobierski MG, Signs K, Blanton JD. Animal bite and rabies postexposure prophylaxis reporting—United States, 2013. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2015; 21:e24-7.
Li AJ, Sreenivasan N, Siddiqi UR, Tahmina S, Penjor K, Sovann L, et al. Descriptive assessment of rabies post-exposure prophylaxis procurement, distribution, monitoring, and reporting in four Asian countries: Bangladesh, Bhutan, Cambodia, and Sri Lanka, 2017–2018. Vaccine. 2018.
Thiede H, Close NS, Koepsell J, Baer A, Duchin JS, Completeness of reporting of rabies postexposure prophylaxis in King County, Washington. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2008;14:448-453.
Bemis K, Frias M, Patel MT, Christiansen D. Using an Emergency Department Syndromic Surveillance System to Evaluate Reporting of Potential Rabies Exposures, Illinois, 2013–2015. Public Health Rep. 2017; 132:1.
Buss SN, Eidson M. State requirements for rabies-related animal control. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2012; 18:E17-23.
Sittichanbuncha Y, Chairat C, Sawanyawisuth K. Rabies postexposure vaccination in Thailand: is it performed according to international guidelines? Asian Biomed 2014;8:393-7.
Yurachai O, Hinjoy S, Wallace RM. An epidemiological study of suspected rabies exposures and adherence to rabies post-exposure prophylaxis in Eastern Thailand, 2015. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2020;14:e0007248.
Tran CH, Afriyie DO, Pham TN, et al. Rabies post-exposure prophylaxis initiation and adherence among patients in Vietnam, 2014-2016. Vaccine. 2019;37 Suppl 1:A54-63.
Thompson PG. The public health impact of dog attacks in a major Australian city. Med J Aust. 1997;167:129-32.
Titoria R, Gupta G. Adherence to Recommended Anti-Rabies Vaccine Schedule: A Rabies Clinic Based Study. Int J Preven Curat Comm Med. 2018;4:9-12.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.