Links to Cyberbullying of Risky Online Behavior and Social Media Addiction among Students in Grades 7-9 in Bangkok

Authors

  • Wanlop Atsariyasing Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok Noi, Bangkok 10700, Thailand.
  • Chayanin Foongsathaporn Department of Psychiatry, John A. Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawaii, Hawaii 96822, United States of America.
  • Quankamon Dejatiwongse Na Ayudhaya Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok Noi, Bangkok 10700, Thailand.
  • Asara Vasupanrajit Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Pathum Wan, Bangkok 10330, Thailand.
  • Sirinda Chanpen Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok Noi, Bangkok 10700, Thailand.
  • Chanvit Pornnoppadol Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok Noi, Bangkok 10700, Thailand.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31584/jhsmr.20241065

Keywords:

adolescent, cyberbullying, internet addiction disorder, risk-taking, Thailand

Abstract

Objective: This present study examined the connections regarding cyberbullying, risky online behavior and social media addiction, among 7th–9th grade students in Bangkok; Thailand.
Material and Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted, using a self-report questionnaire consisting of: demographic data, cyberbullying, risky online behavior and the Social Media Addiction Screening Scale (S-MASS), involving 3,667 students.
Results: Cyberbullying involvement was significantly associated with almost all risky online behaviors. The three riskiest behaviors, according to the odds ratios, were disclosing personal information (odds ratio (OR)=3.7, 95% confidence interval (CI) [2.7, 5.1]), making appointments to meet with online strangers (OR=3.0, 95% CI [2.1, 4.2]), and having conversations with online strangers (OR=2.6, 95% CI [2.3, 3.0]). Additionally, cyberbullying involvement exhibited a strong association with the high-risk category of social media addiction (OR=4.4, 95% CI [3.3, 5.8]). Furthermore, all subgroups of cyberbullying, including cyber-victims, cyberbullies, bystanders and the combined subgroups, demonstrated associations with almost all risky online behaviors. Moreover, the high risk category of social media addiction, with the combined subgroup, exhibited the highest odds ratio. 
Conclusion: Cyberbullying involvement was found to be associated with risky online behavior and social media addiction among middle school students in Bangkok.

References

Schonfeld A, McNiel D, Toyoshima T, Binder R. Cyberbullying and adolescent suicide. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law 2023;51:112- 9.

Bottino SM, Bottino CM, Regina CG, Correia AV, Ribeiro WS. Cyberbullying and adolescent mental health: systematic review. Cad Saude Publica 2015;31:463-75.

Brochado S, Soares S, Fraga S. A scoping review on studies of cyberbullying prevalence among adolescents. Trauma Violence Abuse 2017;18:523-31.

Jadambaa A, Thomas HJ, Scott JG, Graves N, Brain D, Pacella R. Prevalence of traditional bullying and cyberbullying among children and adolescents in Australia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 2019;53:878-88.

Fossum S, Ristkari T, Cunningham C, McGrath PJ, Suominen A, Huttunen J, et al. Parental and child factors associated with participation in a randomised control trial of an Internetassisted parent training programme. Child Adolesc Ment Health 2018;23:71-7.

Barlett CP, Kowalski RM, Wilson AM. Meta-analyses of the predictors and outcomes of cyberbullying perpetration and victimization while controlling for traditional bullying perpetration and victimization. Aggress Violent Behav 2024;74. doi: 10.1016/j. avb.2023.101886.

Wang CW, Musumari PM, Techasrivichien T, Suguimoto SP, Tateyama Y, Chan CC, et al. Overlap of traditional bullying and cyberbullying and correlates of bullying among Taiwanese adolescents: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health 2019; 19:1756.

Brochado S, Soares S, Fraga S. A scoping review on studies of cyberbullying prevalence among adolescents. Trauma Violence Abuse 2017;18:523-31.

Sorrentino A, Sulla F, Santamato M, di Furia M, Toto GA, Monacis L. Has the COVID-19 pandemic affected cyberbullying and cybervictimization prevalence among children and adolescents? a systematic review. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2023;20.5825. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20105825.

Huang N, Zhang S, Mu Y, Yu Y, Riem MME, Guo J. Does the COVID-19 pandemic increase or decrease the global cyberbullying behaviors? a systematic review and metaanalysis. Trauma Violence Abuse 2023;25. doi: 10.1177/ 15248380231171185.

Alim S. Cyberbullying in the world of teenagers and social media: a literature review. Int J Cyber Behav Psychol Learn 2016;6:68-95.

Jung Y-E, Leventhal B, Kim YS, Park TW, Lee S-H, Lee M, et al. Cyberbullying, problematic internet use, and psychopathologic symptoms among Korean youth. Yonsei Med J 2014;55:826-30.

Chen L, Ho SS, Lwin MO. A meta-analysis of factors predicting cyberbullying perpetration and victimization: from the social cognitive and media effects approach. New Media Soc 2017; 19:1194-213.

Görzig A, Ólafsson K. What makes a bully a cyberbully? Unravelling the characteristics of cyberbullies across twenty-five european countries. J Child Media 2013;7:9-27.

Kwan GCE, Skoric MM. Facebook bullying: an extension of battles in school. Comput Human Behav 2013;29:16-25.

Mishna F, Khoury-Kassabri M, Gadalla T, Daciuk J. Risk factors for involvement in cyber bullying: victims, bullies and bully–victims. Child Youth Serv Rev 2012;34:63-70.

Sasson H, Mesch G. The role of parental mediation and peer norms on the likelihood of cyberbullying. J Genet Psychol 2017; 178:15-27.

Chang F-C, Chiu C-H, Miao N-F, Chen P-H, Lee C-M, Chiang J-T, et al. The relationship between parental mediation and Internet addiction among adolescents, and the association with cyberbullying and depression. Compr Psychiatry 2015;57:21-8.

Stodt B, Wegmann E, Brand M. Predicting dysfunctional internet use: the role of age, conscientiousness, and internet literacy in internet addiction and cyberbullying. Int J Cyber Behav Psychol Learn 2016;6:28-43.

Sureda Garcia I, López Penádes R, Rodríguez Rodríguez R, Sureda Negre J. Cyberbullying and internet addiction in gifted and nongifted teenagers. Gift Child Q 2020;64:192-203.

Tsimtsiou Z, Haidich A-B, Drontsos A, Dantsi F, Sekeri Z, Drosos E, et al. Pathological internet use, cyberbullying and mobile phone use in adolescence: a school-based study in Greece. Int J Adolesc Med Health 2018;30. doi: 10.1515/ijamh- 2016-0115.

Gámez-Guadix M, Borrajo E, Almendros C. Risky online behaviors among adolescents: longitudinal relations among problematic Internet use, cyberbullying perpetration, and meeting strangers online. J Behav Addict 2016;5:100-7.

Qudah MFA, Albursan IS, Bakhiet SFA, Hassan EMAH, Alfnan AA, Aljomaa SS, et al. Smartphone addiction and its relationship with cyberbullying among university students. Int J Ment Health Addict 2019;17:628-43.

Kowalski RM, Limber SP, McCord A. A developmental approach to cyberbullying: prevalence and protective factors. Aggr Violent Behav 2019;45:20-32.

Park S, Na E-Y, Kim E-m. The relationship between online activities, netiquette and cyberbullying. Child Youth Serv Rev 2014;42:74-81.

Meter DJ, Bauman S. When sharing is a bad idea: the effects of online social network engagement and sharing passwords with friends on cyberbullying involvement. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw 2015;18:437-42.

Kırcaburun K, Kokkinos CM, Demetrovics Z, Király O, Griffiths MD, Çolak TS. Problematic online behaviors among adolescents and emerging adults: associations between cyberbullying perpetration, problematic social media use, and psychosocial factors. Int J Ment Health Addict 2019;17:891-908.

Tokunaga RS. Following you home from school: a critical review and synthesis of research on cyberbullying victimization. Comput Human Behav 2010;26:277-87.

Sampasa-Kanyinga H. Co-occurring cyberbullying and school bullying victimization and associations with mental health problems among canadian middle and high school students. Violence Vict 2017;32:671-87.

Ngamjarus C. Sample size calculation for health science research. Khon Kaen: Khon Kaen University Printing House; 2021.

Information Group, Basic Educational Policy and Planning Bureau. Table 10: Number of students categorized by gender and grade level, academic year 2016 [homepage on the Internet]. Bangkok: Office of the Basic Education Commission, Ministry of Education; 2016 [cited 2016 Nov 19]. Available from: http:// www.bopp-obec.info/home/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/t10. pdf

Sirirassamee T, Sirirassamee B. Health risk behavior among Thai youth: national survey 2013. Asia Pac J Public Health 2015;27:76-84.

Chanpen S, Pornnoppadol C, Vasupanrajit A, Dejatiwongse Na Ayudhya Q. An assessment of the validity and reliability of the Social-Media Addiction Screening Scale (S-MASS). Siriraj Med J 2023;75:167-80.

Davies J. Display, identity and the everyday: self-presentation through online image sharing. Discourse 2007;28:549-64.

Gangadharbatla H. Facebook me. J Interact Advert 2008;8:5- 15.

Ho SS, McLeod DM. Social-psychological influences on opinion expression in face-to-face and computer-mediated communication. Commun Res 2008;35:190-207.

Giordano AL, Prosek EA, Watson JC. Understanding adolescent cyberbullies: exploring social media addiction and psychological factors. J Child Adolesc Couns 2021;7:42-55.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-19

How to Cite

1.
Atsariyasing W, Foongsathaporn C, Ayudhaya QDN, Vasupanrajit A, Chanpen S, Pornnoppadol C. Links to Cyberbullying of Risky Online Behavior and Social Media Addiction among Students in Grades 7-9 in Bangkok. J Health Sci Med Res [Internet]. 2024 Dec. 19 [cited 2024 Dec. 22];43(1):e20241065. Available from: https://he01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jhsmr/article/view/275658

Issue

Section

Original Article