A Study of Luminance and Visual Attention Patterns in Tourist Photography at Fairy Cave Sarawak

Authors

  • Saiful Azlan Rosli Centre of Optometry Studies, Faculty of Health Sciences, Universiti Teknologi MARA Puncak Alam Campus, 42300 Puncak Alam, Selangor, Malaysia. Optometry and Visual Sciences Research Group (iROViS), Universiti Teknologi MARA Puncak Alam Campus, 42300 Puncak Alam, Selangor, Malaysia.
  • Azmir Ahmad Centre of Optometry Studies, Faculty of Health Sciences, Universiti Teknologi MARA Puncak Alam Campus, 42300 Puncak Alam, Selangor, Malaysia. Optometry and Visual Sciences Research Group (iROViS), Universiti Teknologi MARA Puncak Alam Campus, 42300 Puncak Alam, Selangor, Malaysia.
  • Siti Aisyah Afiqah Jamaluddin HS Optometrist Sdn Bhd, Taman Masjid Tanah Ria, 78300 Masjid Tanah, Melaka, Malaysia.
  • Nur Ain Noor Azman Owndays Malaysia Sdn.Bhd., The Exchange TRX, Tun Razak Exchange, 55188 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
  • Ai-Hong Chen Centre of Optometry Studies, Faculty of Health Sciences, Universiti Teknologi MARA Puncak Alam Campus, 42300 Puncak Alam, Selangor, Malaysia. Optometry and Visual Sciences Research Group (iROViS), Universiti Teknologi MARA Puncak Alam Campus, 42300 Puncak Alam, Selangor, Malaysia.
  • Azhar Abd Jamil Optometry and Visual Sciences Research Group (iROViS), Universiti Teknologi MARA Puncak Alam Campus, 42300 Puncak Alam, Selangor, Malaysia. College of Creative Arts, Universiti Teknologi MARA, 40450 Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31584/jhsmr.20241109

Keywords:

duration, eye movements, fixation, light analysis, luminance profile, virtual tourism

Abstract

Objective: Visual attention involves complex interaction between the cognitive and surrounding environment. Eye movement and light uniformity be the important factor that influence visual attention. Digital photos emit light compared the conventional photos. It would be advantageous to investigate and comprehend the significance of the amount of light that enters the eye, known as luminance. The primary objective of this study was to conduct luminance light and visual attention analysis using scenery images captured from tourist spots located in Fairy Cave, Sarawak. 
Material and Methods: There were 3 parts in this study. Part One: convenient sampling was employed to recruit three adults as tourist photographers to capture images at four pre-selected tourist locations in Fairy Cave, Sarawak. Part Two: a total of 17 photographs were chosen from a pool of forty photographs for the purpose of conducting research on the luminance and visual activity. The luminance analysis evaluated the luminosity emitted by the digital display. The luminous properties were assessed using the CA-2500 2D Colour Analyzer manufactured by Konica Minolta in Japan. The brightness profile of the images is obtained by calculating the Michelson luminance. Part Three: the Dikablis eye tracker was utilised to test the visual attention via eye tracking pattern of a sample of thirty-six adults aged 18 to 40 years. The researchers recorded and examined the total amount and duration of the fixation eye movement.
Results: The 3 photographers that were recognised exhibited both similarities and differences in their photographic skills and preferences. Nevertheless, this was not incorporated into our investigation of visible spectrum light. The observed difference in brightness profiles among the images was found to be statistically insignificant (p-value>0.05). Our study on eye-tracking behaviour in adults revealed significant variations in the total number of fixations (p-value<0.05). 
Conclusion: Our findings provide valuable insights into the interplay between environmental lighting conditions and visual attention in this unique natural setting. Despite having various angle preferences, layperson photographers appear to engage in the same visible light spectrum. Our study indicates that when investigating preferences using the visual attention component, it is important to consider the total count of fixations. Additional investigation could entail the examination of professional photographers’ photography.

References

Le D, Pratt M, Wang Y, Scott N, Lohmann G. How to win the consumer’s heart? Exploring appraisal determinants of consumer pre-consumption emotions. IJHM 2020;88:102542. doi: org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2020.102542.

Zammarchi G, Conversano C. Application of eye tracking technology in medicine: a bibliometric analysis. Vision 2021;5:56. doi: 10.3390/vision5040056.

Lan Y, Liu Q, Zhu Z. Exploring landscape design intensity effects on visual preferences and eye fixations in urban forests: insights from eye tracking technology. Forests 2023;14;1628. doi: 10.3390/f14081628.

Liu Q, Zhu Z, Zeng X, Zhuo Z, Ye B, Fang L, et al. The impact of landscape complexity on preference ratings and eye fixation of various urban green space settings. Urban For Urban Green 2021;66:127411. doi: org/10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127411.

Berto R, Massaccesi S, Pasini M. Do eye movements measured across high and low fascination photographs differ? Addressing Kaplan’s fascination hypothesis. J Environ Psychol 2008;28: 185–91. doi: org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2007.11.004.

Dupont L, Antrop M, Van Eetvelde V. Eye-tracking analysis in landscape perception research: influence of photograph properties and landscape characteristics. Landsc Res 2014; 39:417–32. doi: org/10.1080/01426397.2013.773966.

Dupont L, Ooms K, Antrop M, Eetvelde VV. Comparing saliency maps and eye-tracking focus maps: the potential use in visual impact assessment based on landscape photographs. Landsc Urban Plan 2016;148:17–26. doi: org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.12.007.

Tatler BW. The central fixation bias in scene viewing: selecting an optimal viewing position independently of motor biases and image feature distributions. J Vis 2007;7:1-17. doi: org/10.1167/7.14.4.

Tseng P-H, Carmi R, Cameron IG, Munoz DP, Itti L. Quantifying center bias of observers in free viewing of dynamic natural scenes. J Vis 2009;9:4. doi: org/10.1167/9.7.4.

Tatler BW, Baddeley RJ, Gilchrist ID. Visual correlates of fixation selection: effects of scale and time. Vis Res 2005;45:643–59. doi: org/10.1016/j.visres.2004.09.017.

Chen W, Ruan R, Deng W, Gao J. The effect of visual attention process and thinking styles on environmental aesthetic preference: an eye-tracking study. Front Psychol 2022;13:1027742. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1027742.

Vehlen A, Spenthof I, Tönsing D, Heinrichs M, Domes G. Evaluation of an eye tracking setup for studying visual attention in face-to-face conversations. Sci Rep 2021;11:2661. doi: org/10.1038/s41598-021-81987-x

Lockhofen DEL, Mulert C. Neurochemistry of visual attention. Front Neurosci 2021;15:643597. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2021.643597.

Chen K, Choi HJ. Visual attention and eye movements. Behav Brain Sci 2008;5:65–93.

Justino J, Kolinsky R. Eye movements during reading in beginning and skilled readers: impact of reading level or physiological maturation? Acta Psychol 2023;236:103927. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2023.103927.

Fitts PM, Jones RE, Milton JL. Eye fixations of aircraft pilots. III. Frequency, duration, and sequence fixations when flying Air Force Ground-Controlled Approach system (GCA). Ohio: Technical report, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base: Air Materiel Command; 1949.

Gibbs WJ, Bernas RS. Visual attention in newspaper versus TV-oriented news websites. J Usability Stud 2009;4:147–65.

Jacob RJK, Karn KS. Eye tracking in human-computer interaction and usability research: Ready to deliver the promises. In: Hyona J, Radach R, Deubel H, editors. The mind’s eye: cognitive and applied aspects of eye movement research. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2003; p.573-605. doi: org/10.1016/B978-044451020-4/50031-1.

Kumar G, Chung STL. Characteristics of fixational eye movements in people with macular disease. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2014;55:5125–33. doi: 10.1167/iovs.14-14608.

Yagi C, Morita Y, Yamagishi T, Ogawa Y, Ohyama S, Kitahara T. Gaze instability after exposure to moving visual stimuli in patients with persistent postural-perceptual dizziness. Front Hum Neurosci 2022;16:1056556. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.1056556.

Williams CC, Castelhano MS. The changing landscape: high-level influences on eye movement guidance in scenes. Vision 2019;3:5. doi: 10.3390/vision3030033.

Wolfe JM, Horowitz TS. Five factors that guide attention in visual search. Nat Hum Behav 2017;1:58. doi: 10.1038/s41562-017-0058.

Borji A, Parks D, Itti L. Complementary effects of gaze direction and early saliency in guiding fixations during free viewing. J Vis 2014;14:3. doi: org/10.1167/14.13.3.

Flavián C, Ibáñez-Sánchez S, Orús C. The impact of virtual, augmented and mixed reality technologies on the customer experience. J Bus Res 2019;100:547–60. doi: org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.10.050.

Artemenko AR, Filatova E, Vorobyeva YD, Do TP, Ashina M, Danilov AB. Migraine and light: a narrative review. Headache 2022;62:4–10. doi: 10.1111/head.14250.

Vieira A, van der Linde I, Bright P, Wilkins A. Preference for lighting chromaticity in migraine with aura. Headache 2020;60: 1124–31. doi: 10.1111/head.13801.

Chellappa SL. Individual differences in light sensitivity affect sleep and circadian rhythms. Sleep 2021;44:214. doi: 10.1093/sleep/zsaa214.

Jadhao A, Bagade A, Taware G, Bhonde M. Effect of background color perception on attention span and short-term memory in normal students. Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol 2020;10:981–4. doi: 10.5455/njppp.2020.10.06162202017072020.

Maule J, Skelton AE, Franklin A. The development of color perception and cognition. Annu Rev Psychol 2023;74:87–111. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-032720-040512.

Boyce PR. Human factors in lighting. 2nd ed. 2014. Doi: 10.1201/9780203426340. doi: 10.1201/9780203426340.

Soranzo A, Bruno N. Nonverbal communication in selfies posted on Instagram: another look at the effect of gender on vertical camera angle. PLoS One 2020;15:e0238588. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0238588.

Carstensen LL, Reynolds ME. Age differences in preferences through the lens of socioemotional selectivity theory. JEoA 2023;24:100440. doi: org/10.1016/j.jeoa.2022.100440.

Kellaris JJ, Machleit KA. Signage as marketing communication: A conceptual model and research propositions. IJSW 2016;1: 10–5. doi: org/10.15763/issn.2470 9670.2016.v1.i1.a4.

Tomczuk P, Chrzanowicz M, Jaskowski P. Procedure for measuring the luminance of roadway billboards and preliminary results. Leukos 2022;18:2–20. doi: org/10.1080/15502724.2020.1803752.

Davis H. Creative black and white: digital photography tips and techniques. Santa Barbara (CA): Rocky Nook, Inc.; 2019.

Poulin R. The language of graphic design revised and updated: an illustrated handbook for understanding fundamental design principles. Beverly (MA): Rockport Publishers; 2018.

Li P, Xiao X, Jordan E. Tourists’ visual attention and stress intensity in nature-based tourism destinations: an eye-tracking study during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Travel Res 2023;62:1667–84. doi: 10.1177/00472875221138788.

Negi S, Mitra R. Fixation duration and the learning process: an eye tracking study with subtitled videos. J Eye Mov Res 2020;13:10. doi: 10.16910/jemr.13.6.1.

Li Q, Huang Z, Christianson K. Visual attention toward tourism photographs with text: an eye-tracking study. Tour Manag 2016; 54:243–58. doi: org/10.1016/j.tourman.2015.11.017.

Mohanty A, Sussman TJ. Top-down modulation of attention by emotion. Front Hum Neurosci 2013;7:102. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00102.

Downloads

Published

2024-11-07

How to Cite

1.
Rosli SA, Ahmad A, Jamaluddin SAA, Azman NAN, Chen A-H, Jamil AA. A Study of Luminance and Visual Attention Patterns in Tourist Photography at Fairy Cave Sarawak. J Health Sci Med Res [Internet]. 2024 Nov. 7 [cited 2024 Dec. 23];42(6):e20241109. Available from: https://he01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jhsmr/article/view/275088

Issue

Section

Original Article