Development, Validity, and Reliability of an Easy-to-Use Nutrition Counseling Tool for Thai Outpatients with Liver Cirrhosis

Authors

  • Nicha Sukittiwarapun Division of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla 90110, Thailand.
  • Chaitong Churuangsuk Clinical Nutrition and Obesity Medicine Unit, Division of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla 90110, Thailand.
  • Thammasin Inviya Division of Family and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla 90110, Thailand.
  • Pimsiri Sripongpun Gastroenterology and Hepatology Unit, Division of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla 90110, Thailand.
  • Naichaya Chamroonkul Gastroenterology and Hepatology Unit, Division of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla 90110, Thailand.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31584/jhsmr.20241032

Keywords:

booklet, counseling, liver cirrhosis, nutrition counseling, nutrition guideline, nutrition support

Abstract

Objective: We developed a simple nutritional counseling tool for adults with liver cirrhosis, aiming for doctors, nurses, and patients as the tool’s primary users.
Material and Methods: The tool was created in a booklet design and based on the European Society of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition guideline, which comprises four parts, knowledge about cirrhosis, consequences of malnutrition, nutritional recommendations, and calculation of dry body weight and appropriate daily nutritional requirements. Content validity was assessed by three hepatologists using the item objective congruence (IOC) index wherein a score ≥0.5 indicated valid content. Face validity was evaluated by three doctors, three nurses, one dietitian, and three patients for readability, coherence, understandability, and attractiveness using a rating score of 0-10. A reliability test to calculate dry body weight and carbohydrate and protein intake per meal using an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was conducted to determine the agreement among seven doctors and three nurses (inter-raters) using a total of nine case scenarios.
Results: The contents of the booklet were valid (IOC: 1.00 for all 19 items). For face validity, the scores for readability, coherence, attractiveness, and understandability were 7.6, 8.6, 9, and 8.6 out of 10, respectively. The overall comments showed that the new instrument was attractive and convenient. All doctors and nurses correctly calculated the dry body weight, and carbohydrate and protein intake for nine case scenarios, indicating excellent agreement (ICC: 1.0, p-value<0.001).
Conclusion: The novel nutritional counseling booklet is valid and shows excellent reliability among healthcare providers in calculating body status and nutritional requirements.

References

Ney M, Li S, Vandermeer B, Gramlich L, Ismond KP, Raman M, et al. Systematic review with meta-analysis: nutritional screening and assessment tools in cirrhosis. Liver Int 2020;40:664-73.

Cheung K, Lee SS, Raman M. Prevalence and mechanisms of malnutrition in patients with advanced liver disease, and nutrition management strategies. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2012;10:117-25.

Khadka D, Karki B, Thapa S, Khanal A, Shrestha R, Bhandary S, et al. Prevalence of malnutrition in patients with liver cirrhosis in a tertiary care hospital. J Nepal Med Assoc 2019;57:229-33.

Zambrano DN, Xiao J, Prado CM, Gonzalez MC. Patientgenerated subjective global assessment and computed tomography in the assessment of malnutrition and sarcopenia in patients with cirrhosis: is there any association? Clin Nutr 2020;39:1535-40.

Bischoff SC, Bernal W, Dasarathy S, Merli M, Plank LD, Schutz T, et al. ESPEN practical guideline: clinical nutrition in liver disease. Clin Nutr 2020;39:3533-62.

Plauth M, Bernal W, Dasarathy S, Merli M, Plank LD, Schutz T, et al. ESPEN guideline on clinical nutrition in liver disease. Clin Nutr 2019;38:485-521.

Naseer M, Turse EP, Syed A, Dailey FE, Zatreh M, Tahan V. Interventions to improve sarcopenia in cirrhosis: a systematic review. World J Clin Cases 2019;7:156-70.

Maharshi S, Sharma BC, Srivastava S. Malnutrition in cirrhosis increases morbidity and mortality. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2015;30:1507-13.

Periyalwar P, Dasarathy S. Malnutrition in cirrhosis: contribution and consequences of sarcopenia on metabolic and clinical responses. Clin Liver Dis 2012;16:95-131.

Perumpail BJ, Li AA, Cholankeril G, Kumari R, Ahmed A. Optimizing the nutritional support of adult patients in the setting of cirrhosis. Nutrients 2017;9:1114.

Johnson TM, Overgard EB, Cohen AE, DiBaise JK. Nutrition assessment and management in advanced liver disease. Nutr Clin Pract 2013;28:15-29.

European Association for the Study of the Liver. Electronic address eee, european association for the study of the l. Easl clinical practice guidelines on nutrition in chronic liver disease. J Hepatol 2019;70:172-93.

Moss O. Nutrition priorities: diet recommendations in liver cirrhosis. Clin Liver Dis 2019;14:146-8.

Hoffmann T, Worrall L. Designing effective written health education materials: considerations for health professionals. Disabil Rehabil 2004;26:1166-73.

Rovinelli RJ, Hambleton RK. On the use of content specialists in the assessment of criterion-referenced test item validity. Tijdschrift voor Onderwijsresearch. 1977;2:49-60.

Crocker L, Llabre M, Miller MD. The generalizability of content validity ratings. J Educ Meas 1988;25:287-99.

Tandon P, Low G, Mourtzakis M, Zenith L, Myers RP, Abraldes JG, et al. A Model to Identify Sarcopenia in Patients With Cirrhosis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2016;14:1473-80.

Hardesty DM, Bearden WO. The use of expert judges in scale development. J Bus Res 2004;57:98-107.

Walter SD, Eliasziw M, Donner A. Sample size and optimal designs for reliability studies. Stat Med. 1998;17:101-10.

Wallace LS, Lennon ES. American Academy of Family Physicians patient education materials: can patients read them? Fam Med 2004;36:571-4.

Alavinejad P, Hajiani E, Danyaee B, Morvaridi M. The effect of nutritional education and continuous monitoring on clinical symptoms, knowledge, and quality of life in patients with cirrhosis. Gastroenterol Hepatol Bed Bench 2019;12:17-24.

Burke L, Howat P, Lee AH, Jancey J, Kerr D, Shilton T. Development of a nutrition and physical activity booklet to engage seniors. BMC Res Notes 2008;1:77.

de Oliveira SC, Lopes MV, Fernandes AF. Development and validation of an educational booklet for healthy eating during pregnancy. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem 2014;22:611-20.

Presetiawati I, Andrajati R, Sauriasari R. Effectiveness of a medication booklet and counseling on treatment adherence in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients. Int J App Pharm 2017;9:28.

Joshi HB, Newns N, Stainthorpe A, Macdonagh RP, Keeley FX, Timoney AG. The development and validation of a patientinformation booklet on ureteric stents. BJU International 2001;88:329-34.

Sapkota D, Baird K, Saito AS, Budhathoki SS, Pokharel R, Basnet S, et al. Development and validation of an information booklet aimed at promoting mental health for pregnant women with a history of abuse. J Nepal Health Res Counc 2020;174:456-62.

Horner SD, Surratt D, Juliusson S. Improving readability of patient education materials. J Community Health Nurs 2000;17:15-23.

Valery PC, Bernardes CM, Hayward KL, Hartel G, Haynes K, Gordon LG, et al. Poor disease knowledge is associated with higher healthcare service use and costs among patients with cirrhosis: an exploratory study. BMC Gastroenterol 2022;22.

Volk ML, Fisher N, Fontana RJ. Patient knowledge about disease self-management in cirrhosis. Am J Gastroenterol 2013;108:302-5.

Downloads

Published

2024-03-28

How to Cite

1.
Sukittiwarapun N, Churuangsuk C, Inviya T, Sripongpun P, Chamroonkul N. Development, Validity, and Reliability of an Easy-to-Use Nutrition Counseling Tool for Thai Outpatients with Liver Cirrhosis. J Health Sci Med Res [Internet]. 2024 Mar. 28 [cited 2024 Dec. 23];42(3):e20241032. Available from: https://he01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jhsmr/article/view/270014

Issue

Section

Original Article