Comparison of Socioeconomic Characteristics between Childless and Procreative Couples after Implementation of the Two-Child Policy in Inner Mongolia, China
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31584/jhsmr.2020748Keywords:
Couples, socioeconomic characteristics, theory of planned behavior, two-child policyAbstract
Objective: In the context of China’s “two-child” policy, this study aims to compare socio-demographic characteristics and attitudes towards the desired number of children among couples of different family size. We describe the major reasons for and against couples raising a (further) child based on the theory of planned behavior.
Material and Methods: An interview-based survey was conducted in Inner Mongolia among couples visiting marital registration offices, antenatal care clinics, kindergartens, and primary schools. Using prevalence ratios and 95% confidence intervals estimated from multivariate log-binomial regression models, socio-demographic characteristics and attitudes towards the two-child policy were compared between three types of couples: those without children, those with one child, and those with multiple children.
Results: The sample consisted of 2,013 women aged 20-49 years and their partners. The top difficulty in raising a child was “increased economic burden”. Factors significantly associated with a reduced prevalence of raising children included the woman’s marital age and the couple’s educational achievement, employment status, and monthly income. Factors associated with an increased prevalence of raising children included a lack of inter-couple communication, having a perception of the strong influence of the two-child policy, and Han ethnicity.
Conclusion: Significant socio-demographic differences were seen between couples with and without children in China. Childless couples were more affluent than single- or multi-child couples and they perceived the two-child policy to be less influential on their decision to raise children.
References
Lacovou M, Tavares LP. Yearning, learning, and conceding: reasons men and women change their childbearing Intentions. Popul Dev Rev 2011;37:89-123.
Chen M, Yip PS. The discrepancy between ideal and actual parity in Hong Kong: fertility desire, intention, and behavior. Popul Res Policy Rev 2017;36:583-605.
Huang Y, Tang W, Mu Y, Li X, Liu Z, Wang Y, et al. The sex ratio at birth for 5,338,853 deliveries in China from 2012 to 2015: a facility-based study. PloS One 2016;11. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0167575.
Qin M. Evolution of family planning policy and its impact on population change in China. Southampton: University of Southampton; 2016.
Jones GW. Ultra-low fertility in East Asia: policy responses and challenges. Asian Popul Stud 2019;15:131-49.
Son YJ. Do childbirth grants increase the fertility rate? Policy impacts in South Korea. Rev Econ Househ 2018;16: 713-35.
Nagase N. The effect of family-friendly policies on fertility and maternal labor supply. California: Stanford University; 2017.
Swee-Hock S. Population policies and programmes in Singapore. Hawaii: ISEAS-Yusof Ishak Institute; 2016.
Liu F, Bao J, Boutain D, Straughn M, Adeniran O, DeGrande H, et al. Online responses to the ending of the one-child policy in China: implications for preconception care. Ups J Med Sci 2016:1-8.
Schwank SE, Gu C, Cao Z, Andersson E, Jiang H, Ding Y, et al. China’s child policy shift and its impact on Shanghai and Hangzhou women’s decision-making. Int J Womens Stud 2018;10:639.
Bollen KA, Glanville JL, Stecklov G. Socio-economic status, permanent income, and fertility: a latent-variable approach. Popul Stud 2007;61:15-34.
Monstad K, Propper C, Salvanes KG. Education and fertility: evidence from a natural experiment. Scand J Econ 2008;110: 827-52.
Begall K, Mills MC. The influence of educational field, occupation, and occupational sex segregation on fertility in the Netherlands. Eur Sociol Rev 2012;29:720-42.
Lan M, Kuang Y. The impact of women's education, workforce experience, and the one child policy on fertility in China: a census study in Guangdong, China. Springer Plus 2016;5:1708.
Bao L, Chen F, Zheng Z. Transition in second birth intention in a low fertility context: the case of Jiangsu, China. Asian Popul Stud 2017;13:198-222.
Jiang Q, Li Y, Sanchez-Barricarte JJ. Fertility intention, son Preference, and second childbirth: survey findings from Shaanxi province of China. Soc Indic Res 2016;125:935-53.
Breierova L, Duflo E. The impact of education on fertility and child mortality: do fathers really matter less than mothers? Cambridge: National bureau of economic research; 2004.
Press CS. Basic satistics on all region population census in 1953, 1964, 1982, 1990, 2000 and 2010 [monograph on the Internet]. Inner Mongolia Autonomous Regional: China Statistics Press; 2018 [cited 2019 Dec 20]. Available from: http://tj.nmg.gov.cn/Files/tjnj/2018/zk/indexeh.htm
Keyong D. Population aging and its influences on the economy and society in China. Beijing: Renmin University of China; 2016.
Press CS. Characteristic of aging problem in inner mongolia [monograph on the Internet]. Inner Mongolia: Inner Mongolia of China Statistics Press; 2015 [cited 2019 Dec 15]. Available from: http://www.nmgtj.gov.cn/nmgttj/tjfx/webinfo/2016/01/ 1441781739054285.htmInner
Rich A, Brandes K, Mullan B, Hagger MS. Theory of planned behavior and adherence in chronic illness: a meta-analysis. J Behav Med 2015;38:673-88.
Zeng Y, Hesketh T. The effects of China's Universal twochild policy. Lancet 2016;388:1930-8.
Zhang N, Fan Fm, Huang Sy, Rodriguez MA. Mindfulness training for loneliness among Chinese college students: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Int J Psychol 2018;53: 373-8.
Hawkley LC, Gu Y, Luo YJ, Cacioppo JT. The mental representation of social connections: generalizability extended to Beijing adults. PloS One 2012;7. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone. 0044065.
Falkingham J, Evandrou M, Qin M, Vlachantoni A. Informal care provision across multiple generations in China. Southampton: University of Southampton; 2019.
Chen F, Liu G, Mair CA. Intergenerational ties in context: grandparents caring for grandchildren in China. Social Forces 2011;90:571-94.
Anderberg D, Zhu Y. What a difference a term makes: the effect of educational attainment on marital outcomes in the UK. J Popul Econ 2014;27:387-419.
Cygan-Rehm K, Maeder M. The effect of education on fertility: evidence from a compulsory schooling reform. Labour Econ 2013;25:35-48.
Nozaki Y. The effects of higher education on childrearing fertility behavior in Japan. Int J Soc 2017;44:653-69.
Molina JA, Montuenga VM. The motherhood wage penalty in Spain. J Fam Econ Issues 2009;30:237-51.
Billingsley S, Puur A, Sakkeus L. Jobs, careers, and becoming a parent under state socialist and market conditions: evidence from Estonia 1971-2006. Demographic Res 2014;30:1733-68.
Osiewalska B. Childlessness and fertility by couples' educational gender (in) equality in Austria, Bulgaria, and France. Demographic Res 2017;37:325-62.
Wang C. History of the Chinese family planning program: 1970– 2010. Contraception 2012;85:563-9.
Zhang Y. A qualitative study of Chinese women’s fertility desire in light of the recent two-child policy. Scania: Lund University; 2018.
Hesketh T, Lu L, Xing ZW. The effect of china's one-child family policy after 25 years. N Engl J Med 2005;353:1171-6.
Yi Zeng ZW. A policy analysis on challenges and opportunities of population/household aging in China. Popul Ageing 2014;7:255-81.
Huang J, Qin D, Jiang T, Wang Y, Feng Z, Zhai J, et al. Effect of fertility policy changes on the population structure and economy of China: from the perspective of the shared socioeconomic pathways. Washington: AGU-100; 2019.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
