Factors affecting the number of nonconformities from the assessment of safety in medical laboratory according to ISO 15190:2003
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background: Bureau of Laboratory Quality Standards established medical laboratory safety accreditation program according to ISO 15190: 2003 in Thailand since May 2013. Nonconformities (NCs) were found from 1 to 18 in each laboratory. Number of NCs may be based on variety of factors such as location of laboratory, type of organization, type and number of test items, duration of accreditation and type of NCs.
Objective: To determine the factors affecting number of NCs found by ISO 15190:2003 assessment.
Method: Multiple logistic regression was used to analyze 249 NCs of 54 medical laboratories assessed from May 2013 to December 2014.
Results: There were 4 factors affecting the number of NCs more than average. They were 1) design for safety (Adjusted Odds Ratio, ORadj=16.50, p=0.002), 2) procedures, documentation, audits and inspection (ORadj=102.20, p=0.005), 3) personnel responsibilities (ORadj=43.23, p=0.023), and 4) safe work practices (ORadj=35.37, p=0.008).
Conclusion: Improperly design of laboratory safety causes more NCs. Factors affected included no standard documented procedures, no audits and inspection for safety, personnel has no responsibilities in safety aspect, and no safe work practices. The more NCs found, the lower level of laboratory safety detected. Therefore, to reduce NCs in order to provide safety for staffs, visitors as well as environmental, these 4 factors should be focused as first priority.
Bull Chiang Mai Assoc Med Sci 2016; 49(2): 255-262. Doi: 10.14456/jams.2016.20
Article Details
Personal views expressed by the contributors in their articles are not necessarily those of the Journal of Associated Medical Sciences, Faculty of Associated Medical Sciences, Chiang Mai University.
References
2. Michael A Noble. ISO 15190:2003 Medical Laboratories - Requirements for Safety. The Journal of the International Federation Of Clinical Chemistry And Laboratory Medicine 2004 [Internet]. [cited 2015 Jul 5]. Available from: http://www.ifcc.org/ejifcc/vol15no4/150412200405.htm
3. ดิเรก ลิ้มมธุรสกุล. การวิเคราะห์ข้อมูลด้วยโปรแกรม STATA 10. กรุงเทพฯ: สำนักพิมพ์แห่งจุฬาลงกรณ์มหาวิทยาลัย; 2556.
4. Safeworkaustralia.gov.au [Internet]. Canberra: Guidance on The Principles of Safe Design for Work; 2006 [cited 2015 Aug 11]. Available from: http://www.safeworkaustralia.gov.au/sites/swa/about/publications/pages/gm2006principlesofsafedesign
5. World Health Organization. Laboratory biosafety manual. 3rd ed. Geneva: The Organization; 2004.
6. National Research Council (US). Prudent Practices in the Laboratory Handling and Management of Chemical Hazards. Washington: National Academies Press; 2011.