Development of dysphagia screening questionnaire for Thai older adults

Main Article Content

Phichaya Baramee
Supatida Sorasak Siangchin
Surachart Thongchoomsin

Abstract

Background: Oropharyngeal dysphagia is a common condition in the older person and can lead to serious complications. In Thailand, there is currently no standardized dysphagia screening tool for gathering preliminary information about clients for early evaluation and intervention.


Objective: This study aimed to develop a dysphagia risk screening tool for older persons and investigate its psychometric properties. This study examined the content validity, criterion validity, and test-retest of the Geriatric Dysphagia Risk Screening Tool (GDRST).


Materials and methods: 26 questions were developed from literature review and expert opinion. Five expert occupational therapists examined content validity. The Index of Congruence (IOC) was calculated from five experts, and the items that showed IOC scores of over 0.5 were incorporated into the target screening tool. Thirty older adults who had a risk of dysphagia (Mean±SD, 66.13±4.66 years) participated in the study. The internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach’s alpha. An intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to examine the test-retest reliability of the screening tool. The criterion validity of the GDRST was evaluated by investigating the relationships between a score of the Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS) and the Swallowing Quality Assessment Form for Occupational Therapists (SQAOT) using Spearman’s correlation coefficients.


Results: Based on the literature review and occupational therapy expert opinions, the screening tool covers three domains, including the cognition domain, oral phase swallowing ability domain, and pharyngeal phase swallowing ability domain. Content validity IOC scores were between 0.6 and 1.0 for all items. The internal consistency of the GDRST was high, with 0.971 Cronbach’s alpha for the test. The screening tool had excellent test-retest reliability on all items (p<0.05). The score of the GDRST was significantly correlated with the score of FOIS (r=-0.468, p=0.009), and SQAOT (r=-0.705, p=0.000).


Conclusion: The GDRST demonstrated excellent reliability and validity against the clinical assessment. It was simple to administer and could be beneficial for screening older people in the community for dysphagia.

Article Details

How to Cite
Baramee, P., Siangchin, S., & Thongchoomsin, S. (2025). Development of dysphagia screening questionnaire for Thai older adults. Journal of Associated Medical Sciences, 58(2), 170–178. retrieved from https://he01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/bulletinAMS/article/view/273619
Section
Research Articles

References

Foundation of Thai Gerontology Research and Development institute (TGRI). Situation of the Thai elderly 2015 [Internet]. Institute for Population and Social Research, Mahidol University; 2015 [cited 2021 August 2]. Available from: http://thaitgri.org/? p=37841.

Feng HY, Zhang PP, Wang XW. Presbyphagia: Dysphagia in the elderly. World J Clin Cases. 2023; 11(11): 2363-73. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i11.2363.

Takizawa C, Gemmell E, Kenworthy J, Speyer R. A systematic review of the prevalence of oropharyngeal dysphagia in stroke, Parkinson’s disease, Alzheimer’s disease, head injury, and pneumonia. Dysphagia. 2016; 31(3): 434-41. doi: 10.1007/s00455-016-9695-9.

Serra-Prat M, Hinojosa G, López D, Juan M, Folch F, Voss D, et al. Prevalence of oropharyngeal dysphagia and impaired safety and efficacy of swallow in independently living older persons. JAGS. 2011; 59: 186-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.03227.x.

Rivelsrud M, Hartelius L, Bergström L, Løvstad M, Speyer R. Prevalence of oropharyngeal dysphagia in adults in different healthcare settings: A systematic review and meta-analyses. Dysphagia. 2022; 38(1): 76-121. doi: 10.1007/s00455-022-10465-x.

Baijens LW, Clavé P, Cras P, Ekberg O, Forster A, Kolb GF, et al. European Society for Swallowing Disorders - European Union Geriatric Medicine Society white paper: Oropharyngeal dysphagia as a geriatric syndrome. Clin Interv Aging. 2016; 11: 1403-28. doi: 10.2147/CIA. S107750.

Speyer R. Oropharyngeal dysphagia: Screening and assessment. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2013; 46(6): 989-1008. doi: 10.1016/j.otc.2013.08.004.

Cordier R, Speyer R, Martinez M, Parsons L. Reliability and validity of non-instrumental clinical assessments for adults with oropharyngeal dysphagia: A Systematic review. J Clin Med. 2023; 12(2): 721. doi: 10.3390/jcm 12020721.

Audag N, Liistro G, Vandervelde L, van den Bogaert E, Toussaint M, Reychler G. Development of a Dutch version of the Sydney Swallow Questionnaire: Assessing oropharyngeal dysphagia severity in Dutch-speaking populations. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2024; 76(3): 2361-6. doi: 10.1007/s12070-024-04484-3.

de Oliveira GD, Vicente LCC, Mourão AM, dos Santos SHGP, de Lima Friche AA, Bicalho MAC. Dysphagia screening in Brazilian older adults with dementia: Content development and validation of a questionnaire for caregivers - RaDID-QC. J Cross Cult Gerontol. 2024; 39(4): 457-79. doi: 10.1007/s10823-024-09510-z.

Belafsky PC, Mouadeb DA, Rees CJ, Pryor JC, Postma GN, Allen J, et al. Validity and reliability of the Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10). Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2008; 117(12): 919-24. doi: 10.1177/000348940811 701210.

Zhang PP, Yuan Y, Lu DZ, Li TT, Zhang H, Wang HY, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of the Eating Assessment Tool-10 (EAT-10) in Screening Dysphagia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Dysphagia. 2023; 38(1): 145-58. doi: 10.1007/s00455-022-10486-6.

Korwanich K, Korwanich N, Kongma P, Klibngern H, Tavisak N. Validation of the Thai version of the Eating Assessment Tool-10 (Thai EAT-10)(Report). Faculty of Dentistry, Chiang Mai University; 2021.

Kongma P, Korwanich N, Klibngern H, Tavisak N, Inoue M, Korwanich K. Screening algorithms for detecting dysphagia: A validation study of Thai EAT-10 combined with the 3-Ounce Water Swallow Test. J Assoc Med Sci 2023, 56, 99-105.

Pedrolli C. Eating assessment tool (EAT-10) has been validated as a screening tool for dysphagia, not for Oropharyngeal dysphagia. J Nutr Health Aging. 2023; 27(11): 1149. doi: 10.1007/s12603-023-2013-y.

Mascha EJ, Vetter TR. Significance, Errors, Power, and Sample Size: The Blocking and tackling of statistics. Anesth Analg. 2018; 126(2): 691-8. doi: 10.1213/ ANE.0000000000002741.

Crary MA, Mann GD, Groher ME. Initial psychometric assessment of a functional oral intake scale for dysphagia in stroke patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005; 86(8): 1516-20. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2004.11.049.

Pornsawan P, Porntippa T, Porntippa T, Chalinee K. Development of swallowing quality assessment form for occupational therapist. Mahidol R2R e-Journal. 2021; 8(2): 102-10. doi: 10.14456/jmu.2021.22.

Clavé P, Rofes L, Carrión S, Ortega O, Cabré M, Serra-Prat M, et al. Pathophysiology, relevance and natural history of oropharyngeal dysphagia among older people. Nestle Nutr Inst Workshop Ser. 2012; 72: 57-66. doi: 10.1159/000339986.

Furuta M, Komiya-Nonaka M, Akifusa S, Shimazaki Y, Adachi M, Kinoshita T, et al. Interrelationship of oral health status, swallowing function, nutritional status, and cognitive ability with activities of daily living in Japanese elderly people receiving home care services due to physical disabilities. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2013; 41(2): 173-81. doi: 10.1111/cdoe.12000.

Rech RS, Baumgarten A, Colvara BC, Brochier CW, de Goulart B, Hugo FN, et al. Association between oropharyngeal dysphagia, oral functionality, and oral sensorimotor alteration. Oral Dis. 2018; 24(4): 664-72. doi: 10.1111/odi.12809.

Iyota K, Mizutani S, Oku S, Asao M, Futatsuki T, Inoue R, et al. A Cross-sectional study of age-related changes in oral function in healthy Japanese individuals. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020; 17(4): 1376. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17041376.

Bours GJ, Speyer R, Lemmens J, Limburg M, de Wit R. Bedside screening tests vs. videofluoroscopy or fibreoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing to detect dysphagia in patients with neurological disorders: systematic review. J Adv Nurs. 2009; 65(3): 477-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2008.04915.x.