Motivational factors influencing research completion: A literature review for occupational therapy and health professions
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background: Graduate education, particularly at the master’s and doctoral levels, is crucial in developing advanced professional skills and fostering a researchoriented mindset. However, many students struggle to complete their research due to various motivational and institutional challenges. This literature review examines the factors influencing research completion in graduate school to provide insights into occupational therapy and related health professions, emphasizing the importance of intrinsic and extrinsic motivational factors.
Objective: The primary goals of this review are to (1) identify the intrinsic and extrinsic motivational factors that influence research completion, (2) explore the barriers to research completion at the graduate level, and (3) propose motivational strategies that graduate programs can adopt to support research completion among occupational therapy and other health professions.
Materials and methods: A literature search was conducted across multiple databases, including the ASEAN Citation Index, EBSCO, Google Scholar, and Scopus. The review focused on studies published between 2010 and 2024 investigating motivational strategies, barriers, and research completion in graduate school. A total of 17 peer-reviewed articles met the inclusion criteria and were subjected to frequency and thematic analyses to identify key themes and patterns.
Results: The thematic analysis revealed four key themes: (1) intrinsic motivation and personal growth, (2) external support and institutional resources, (3) barriers to research completion, and (4) improving support systems. The findings highlight that intrinsic factors such as personal satisfaction and ambition are crucial for research completion, while external factors like mentorship, institutional resources, and cultural context play significant roles. Identified barriers include imposter syndrome, inadequate supervision, and time management challenges. Enhancing mentorship, strengthening institutional support, and developing student skills are recommended to improve research completion rates.
Conclusion: This review underscores the importance of addressing intrinsic and extrinsic motivational factors to support research completion among graduate students in occupational therapy and related health professions. By implementing targeted strategies that enhance mentorship, provide robust institutional support, and develop essential research skills, graduate programs can significantly improve research outcomes and advance evidence-based practice in health professions.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Personal views expressed by the contributors in their articles are not necessarily those of the Journal of Associated Medical Sciences, Faculty of Associated Medical Sciences, Chiang Mai University.
References
Association of Southeast Asian Nations [ASEAN]. ASEAN qualifications reference network (AQRF) [Internet]. 2014 [cited 2023 Jul 17]. Available from: https://asean.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/ ED-02-ASEAN-Qualifications-Reference-FrameworkJanuary-2016.pdf.
Reston ED, Jugar, RR. Building a research culture in Philippine graduate education: reflections on experiences in mathematics education. In: Atweh B, Fan L, Vistro-Yu CP (Ed) Asian research in mathematics education. Singapore: Springer; 2023. doi: 10.1007/978-981-99-0643-7_1.
Owens A, Brien DL, Ellison E, Batty C. Student reflections on doctoral learning: challenges and breakthroughs. Stud Grad and Postdoctoral Educ. 2020; 11(1): 107-22. doi: 10.1108/SGPE-04-2019- 0048.
Adebisi YA. Undergraduate students’ involvement in research: values, benefits, barriers and recommendations. Ann Med Surg. 2022; 81. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2022.104384.
Toquero CMD. “Real-world:” preservice teachers’ research competence and research difficulties in action research. J Appl Res High Educ. 2021; 13(1): 126-48. doi: 10.1108/JARHE-03-2019-0060.
Damoco TB. Philippine graduate students’ perspectives on CMO No. 15 Series 2019 as basis for a conceptual model. Educ Admin: Theory and Practice. 2024; 3(5): 883-8. doi: 10.53555/kuey.v30i5.2974.
van Rooij E, Fokkens-Bruinsma M, Jansen E. Factors that influence PhD candidates’ success: the importance of PhD project characteristics. Stud Cont Educ. 2021; 43(1): 48-67. doi: 10.1080/0158037X.2019.1652158.
Pitout H. Barriers and strategies to increase research involvement of South African occupational therapists. S Afr J Occup Ther [Internet]. 2014; 44(2): 17-21. Available from: http://www.scielo.org.za/scielo.php? script=sci_arttext&pid=S2310-38332014000200005 &lng=en&tlng=en.
Grant MJ, Booth A. A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Info Libr J. 2009; 26(2): 91-108. doi: 10.1111/ j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x.
Peters MD, Godfrey C, McInerney P, Munn Z, Tricco AC, Khalil H. Scoping reviews. In: JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis. JBI; 2024.
Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006; 3(2): 77-101. doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
Campbell F, Tricco AC, Munn Z, Pollock D, Saran A, Sutton A, et al. Mapping reviews, scoping reviews, and evidence and gap maps (EGMs): the same but different- the “Big Picture” review family. Syst Rev. 2023; 12: 45. doi:10.1186/s13643-023-02178-5.
Brooks JV, Dickinson BL, Quesnelle KM, Bonaminio GA, Chalk-Wilayto J, Dahlman KB, et al. Professional identity formation of basic science medical educators: A qualitative study of identity supports and threats. Acad Med. 2023; 98(11S): S14-S23. doi: 10.1097/ ACM.0000000000005354.
Van Bragt CAC, Bakx AWEA, Bergen TCM, Croon MA. Looking for students’ personal characteristics predicting study outcome. High Educ. 2011; 61: 59- 75. doi: 10.1007/s10734-010-9325-7.
Gamage KAA, Dehideniya DMSCPK, Ekanayake SY. The role of personal values in learning approaches and student achievements. Behav Sci. 2021;11(7):102. DOI: 10.3390/bs11070102.
Lindahl J. Conscientiousness predicts doctoral students’ research productivity. J Informetr. 2023; 17(1): 101353. doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2022.101353.
Jung J, Li X. Exploring motivations of a master’s degree pursuit in Hong Kong. Higher Educ Q. 2021; 75: 321-32. doi:10.1111/hequ.12276.
Amani J, Myeya H, Mhewa M. Understanding the motives for pursuing postgraduate studies and causes of late completion: supervisors and supervisees’ experiences. Sage Open. 2022; 12(3). doi: 10.1177/21582440221109586.
Chang JC, Wu YT, Ye JN. A study of graduate students’ achievement motivation, active learning, and active confidence based on relevant research. Front Psychol. 2022; 13. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.915770.
Mosyjowski EA, Daly SR, Peters DL. Drivers of research topic selection for engineering doctoral students. Int J Eng Educ [Internet]. 2017; 33(4): 1283-96. Available from: https://dalyresearch.engin. umich.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/237/2018/02/ Drivers-of-research-topic-selection-for-engineeringdoctoral-students.pdf.
Carra KA, Fortune T, Ennals P, D’Cruz K, Kohn H. Supporting scholarly identity and practice: Narratives of occupational therapy academics. Brit J Occup Ther. 2017; 80(8): 502-9. doi: 10.1177/0308022617700653.
Shahsavar Z, Kourepaz H. Postgraduate students’ difficulties in writing their theses literature review. Cogent Educ. 2020; 7(1): 1784620. doi: 10.1080/ 2331186X.2020.1784620
Le M, Pham L, Kim K, Bui N. The impacts of supervisor -PhD student relationships on PhD students’ satisfaction: a case study of Vietnamese universities. J Univ Teach Learn Prac. [Internet]. 2021; 18(4). Available from: https://ro.uow.edu.au/jutlp/vol18/ iss4/18.
Abdul Rauf FH. Challenges of thesis work: towards minimizing the non-completion rate in the postgraduate degree program. Eur J Bus Manag. [Internet]. 2016; 8(7). Available from: https://iiste. org/Journals/index.php/EJBM/article/view/29456.
Jiranek V. Potential predictors of timely completion among dissertation research students at an Australian faculty of sciences. Int J Doctoral Stud. 2010; 5: 1-13. doi: 10.28945/709.
Virtanen P, Nevgi A, Niemi H. Self-regulation in higher education: students’ motivational, regulational and learning strategies, and their relationships to study success. Stud Learn Soc. 2015; 3(1-2): 20-36. doi: 10.2478/sls-2013-0004.
Doyle NW, Gafni Lachter L, Jacobs K. Scoping review of mentoring research in the occupational therapy literature, 2002-2018. Aust Occup Ther J. 2019; 66(5): 541-51. doi: 10.1111/1440-1630.12579.
Quimbo MAT, Sulabo EC. Research productivity and its policy implications in higher education institutions. Stud High Educ. 2014; 39(10): 1955-71. doi: 10.1080/03075079.2013.818639.
Quitoras MCL, Abuso JE. Best practices of higher education institutions (HEIs) for the development of research culture in the Philippines. Pedagogical Res. 2021; 6(1): em0087. doi: 10.29333/pr/9355.