Activity Card Sort’s existence and execute in various languages and versions: A scoping review

Main Article Content

Jayachandran Vetrayan
Supaporn Chinchai
Peeraya Munkhetvit
Prathap Suganthirababu
Jananya P. Dhippayom

Abstract

Background: Activity Card Sort (ACS) measures patient activity participation, especially in older adults. It was developed to evaluate instrumental, social, and leisure activities of low and high demand in various populations. Transferring an ACS tool between diverse settings is challenging due to significant socio-economic, linguistic, and environmental impacts. Hence, to tailor ACS tools to a specific society’s socio-cultural context, comprehension of the accessible validated ACS tools and their psychometric attributes is essential.


Objective: This scoping review was conducted to explore the availability of the ACS tool and to summarize the psychometric properties, such as the reliability and validity, of different languages and versions of ACS available worldwide.


Materials and methods: A search was performed in PubMed, PsycNET, Cochrane, and Embase. Two independent reviewers conducted the screening process and extracted the data. The total sample included 370 articles, of which 26 studies met the inclusion criteria, providing information on psychometric properties. English and non-English versions (Arabic, Dutch, and Spanish) in different populations were included.


Results: Among the 26 studies in this review, most ACS studies used the English version (62.5%). All the reported studies revealed “good” internal consistency, in which the Cronbach’s alpha (α) ranges between 0.61 and 0.91. Test-retest reliability was measured using ICC values ranging from 0.78 to 0.98 for numeric data and Kappa statistics for binary data. Two studies used Kappa statistics to test the reliability, which ranged from 0.48 to 0.85 for all domains, indicating moderate to good reliability. Measures of content validation, face validity, concurrent, convergent, and discriminative validity were also reported.


Conclusion: Good psychometric properties were reported. No study is available on the Indian population using the ACS tool. Hence, developing and validating an ACS tool for the Tamil Nadu population is needed.

Article Details

How to Cite
Vetrayan, J., Chinchai, S. ., Munkhetvit, P., Suganthirababu, P., & P. Dhippayom, J. (2024). Activity Card Sort’s existence and execute in various languages and versions: A scoping review. Journal of Associated Medical Sciences, 57(2), 20–30. Retrieved from https://he01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/bulletinAMS/article/view/266756
Section
Review Articles
Author Biographies

Supaporn Chinchai, Department of Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Associated Medical Sciences, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai Province, Thailand

Ph.D., Associate Professor

Prathap Suganthirababu, Saveetha College of Physiotherapy, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, India

Ph.D., Professor

Jananya P. Dhippayom, Department of Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Associated Medical Sciences, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai Province, Thailand

Ph.D., Associate Professor

Name: Dr. Jananya Panyamee Dhippayom

Complete Postal Address with Pin Code: Department of Occupational Therapy, 110 Faculty of

Associated Medical Sciences, Chiang Mai University, Inthawaroros Road, Muang District,

Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand

Mobile No: +66 (0) 804404675

Mail id:  jananya.p@cmu.ac.th  

References

Bernardo LD, Pontes TB, Souza KID, Ferreira RG, Deodoro TMS, Almeida PHTQD. Activity Card Sort e o repertório ocupacional de idosos: uma revisão integrativa da literatura. Cad Bras Ter Ocupacional. 2021; 29: e2130. doi: 10.1177/07334648211015458.

Laver-Fawcett A, Mallinson S. Development of the

Activity Card Sort-United Kingdom Version (ACS-UK). OTJR Occup Particip Health. 2013; 33(3): 134-45. doi: 10.3928/15394492-20130614-02

Sachs D, Josman N. The Activity Card Sort: A factor analysis. OTJR Occup Particip Health. 2003; 23(4): 165-74. doi:10.1177/153944920302300404

Neri AL, Vieira LAM. Envolvimento social e suporte social percebido na velhice. Rev Bras Geriatr E Gerontol. 2013; 16(3): 419-32. doi.org/10.1590/S1809-98232013000300002

Tamil Nadu. In: Wikipedia [Internet]. 2023 [cited 2023 Aug 10]. Available from: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index. php?title=Tamil_Nadu&oldid=1167832165#cite_ ref-FOOTNOTECensus_of_Tamil_Nadu2001_94-0

Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, O’Brien KK, Colquhoun H, Levac D, et al. PRISMA Extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med. 2018; 169(7): 467-73. doi: 10.7326/M18-0850

Katz N, Karpin H, Lak A, Furman T, Hartman-Maeir A. Participation in occupational performance: Reliability and validity of the Activity Card Sort. OTJR Occup Part Health. 2003;23(1):10-7. doi.org/10.1177/15394492030230010

Orellano EM, Ito M, Dorne R, Irizarry D, Dávila R. Occupational participation of older adults: Reliability and validity of the Activity Card Sort-Puerto Rican Version. OTJR Occup Part Health. 2012; 32(1): 266- 72. doi.org/10.3928/15394492-20110708-01

Tse T, Carey LM. The Activity Card Sort-Australia: Validation and reliability in an Australian stroke cohort. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2016; 42: 112. doi: 10.1177/1539449216681277

Hoyt CR, Chuck AC, Varughese TE, Fisher LC, Manis HE, KE O, et al. Psychometric properties of the Infant Toddler Activity Card Sort. OTJR Occup Particip Health. 2021; 41(4): 259-67. doi.org/10.1177/15394 492211012657

Chan VWK, Chung JCC, Packer TL. Validity and reliability of the Activity Card Sort-Hong Kong Version. OTJR Occup Part Health. 2006; 26(4): 152-8. doi: 10.5014/ajot.2010.09033

Berg C, McCollum M, Cho E, Jason D. Development of the Adolescent and Young Adult Activity Card Sort. OTJR Occup Particip Health. 2015; 35(4):221-31. doi: 10.5014/ajot.2010.09033

McCollum M, LaVesser P, Berg C. Participation in daily activities of young adults with high functioning autism spectrum disorder. J Autism Dev Disord. 2016; 46(3): 987-97. doi: 10.1007/s10803-015-2642-z

Berg C, LaVesser P. The Preschool Activity Card Sort. OTJR Occup Part Health. 2006; 26(4): 143-51. doi.org/10.1037/t56111-000

Hamed R, Alheresh R, Dahab SA, Collins B, Fryer J, Holm MB. Development of the Arab Heritage Activity Card Sort. Int J Rehabil Res Int Z Rehabil Rev Int Rech Readaptation. 2011; 34(4): 299-306. doi: 10.1097/MRR.0b013e32834afc58

Malkawi SH, Hamed RT, Abu-Dahab SM, AlHeresh RA, Holm MB. Development of the Arabic Version of the Preschool Activity Card Sort (A-PACS). Child Care Health Dev. 2015; 41(4): 559-68. doi: 10.1111/cch.12209

Hoyt CR, Fernandez JD, Varughese TE, Grandgeorge E, Manis HE, O’Connor KE, et al. The Infant Toddler Activity Card Sort: A caregiver report measure of children’s occupational engagement in family activities and routines. OTJR Occup Particip Health. 2020; 40(1): 36-41. doi.org/10.1177/1539449219852030

Tyminski QP, Drummond RR, Heisey CF, Evans SK, Hendrix A, Jaegers LA, et al. Initial development of the Activity Card Sort-advancing inclusive participation from a homeless population perspective. Occup Ther Int. 2020; 2020: 9083082. doi: 10.1155/2020/9083082

Doney RM, Packer TL. Measuring changes in activity participation of older Australians: Validation of the Activity Card Sort-Australia. Australas J Ageing. 2008; 27(1): 33-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-6612.2007.00265.x

Stoffel A, Berg C. Spanish translation and validation of the Preschool Activity Card Sort. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2008; 28(2): 171-89. doi: 10.1080/01942630802031859

Hamed R, Holm MB. Psychometric properties of the Arab Heritage Activity Card Sort. Occup Ther Int. 2013; 20(1): 23-34. doi: 10.1002/oti.1335

Poerbodipoero SJ, Sturkenboom IH, van Hartingsveldt MJ, Nijhuis-van der Sanden MW, Graff MJ. The construct validity of the Dutch Version of the Activity Card Sort. Disabil Rehabil. 2016; 38(19): 1943-51. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2015.1107779

Malkawi SH, Abu-Dahab SMN, Amro AF, Almasri NA. The psychometric properties of the Arabic Preschool Activity Card Sort. Occup Ther Int. 2017; 2017: 5180382. doi: 10.1155/2017/5180382

Boone AE, Wolf TJ, Baum CM. Development and initial testing of the Electronic Activity Card Sort (ACS3) among community-dwelling adults. Am J Occup Ther Off Publ Am Occup Ther Assoc [Internet]. 2022 May;76(3). Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm. nih.gov/35671503/ doi: 10.5014/ajot.2022.047522

Lyons KD, Li Z, Tosteson TD, Meehan K, Ahles TA. Consistency and construct validity of the Activity Card Sort (modified) in measuring activity resumption after stem cell transplantation. Am J Occup Ther Off Publ Am Occup Ther Assoc. 2010; 64(4): 562-9. doi: 10.5014/ajot.2010.09033

Jong AM, van Nes FA, Lindeboom R. The Dutch Activity Card Sort institutional version was reproducible, but biased against women. Disabil Rehabil. 2012; 34(18): 1550-5. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2011.647232

Gronski MP, Niemann A, Berg C. Participation patterns of urban preschoolers attending head start. OTJR Occup Part Health. 2013; 33(2): 68-75. doi.org/10.3928/15394492-20121026-01

Laver-Fawcett A, Brain L, Brodie C, Cardy L, Manaton L. The face validity and clinical utility of the Activity Card Sort-United Kingdom (ACS-UK). Br J Occup Ther. 2016; 79(8): 492-504. doi.org/10.1177/0308022616629167

Gustafsson L, Hung IHM, Liddle J. Test-retest reliability and internal consistency of the Activity Card SortAustralia (18-64). OTJR Occup Part Health. 2017; 37(1): 50-6. doi: 10.1177/1539449216681277

Gustafsson L, Martin A, Buijsman L, Poerbodipoero S, Liddle J, Ireland D. Parallel-forms reliability and clinical utility of an application version of the Activity Card Sort Australia (18-64). Am J Occup Ther Off Publ Am Occup Ther Assoc. 2018; 72(6): 7206205070 p1-8. doi: 10.5014/ajot.2018.028688

Leenders JMP, Geurts ACH, Steultjens EMJ, Packer TL, Cup EHC. Test-retest reliability of three life balance measures in people with neuromuscular disease: the Activity Card Sort-NL, the activity calculator, and the occupational balance questionnaire. Disabil Rehabil. 2023; 1-7. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2023.2213482