Reliability of running parameters using fitness watches synced with accelerometers during outdoor runs
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background: To prevent running related injuries and return to sport activities, monitoring the running dynamic parameters (cadence, stride length, ground contact time and vertical oscillation) especially outdoor running is crucial. Previous studies investigated the reliability of these parameters in laboratory settings. However, the nature of outdoor runs is different (curve, uphill, other runners, etc.) and challenging in terms of equipment (simple) and environments (grass, asphalt, rubber, etc.). Therefore, the reliability of these parameters using a fitness watch synced with accelerometer needed to be investigated.
Objective: To investigate the reliability of running parameters measured using fitness watches and accelerometers during outdoor runs.
Materials and methods: 30 healthy volunteers (age 25.8±9.6 years, height 167.2±9.3 cm, weight 62.4±14.2 kg, and body mass index 22.2±3.8 kg/m2) participated in the study. They wore a fitness watch and attached a synced accelerometer at their pants. They completed 2 running laps (800 meters each) at their comfortable speeds. Resting periods were provided between laps. To control the speed for the second lap, the watch was set the maximum and minimum speed and set vibration and sound alarm mode. Running parameters include cadence, stride length, vertical oscillation, and ground contact time.
Results: The reliability of the four running parameters (cadence, stride length, ground contact time, and vertical oscillation), indicated by the intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC (3,k)) was 0.94, 0.97, 0.98 and 0.99, respectively. Very high reliability values were confirmed.
Conclusion: Using a fitness watch synced with an accelerometer during outdoor runs, running dynamic parameters (cadence, stride length, ground contact time, and vertical oscillation) illustrated very high levels of reliability.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Personal views expressed by the contributors in their articles are not necessarily those of the Journal of Associated Medical Sciences, Faculty of Associated Medical Sciences, Chiang Mai University.
References
Lopes AD, Hespanhol Junior LC, Yeung SS, Costa LO. What are the main running-related musculoskeletal injuries? A Systematic Review. Sports Med. 2012; 42(10): 891-905. doi: 10.1007/BF03262301.
Davis IS, Bowser BJ, Mullineaux DR. Greater vertical impact loading in female runners with medically diagnosed injuries: a prospective investigation. Br J Sports Med. 2016; 50(14): 887-92. doi: 10.1136/ bjsports-2015-094579.
Ferna´ndez-Lo´ pez I, Rojano-Ortega D. Lower limb biomechanical factors related to running injuries: A review and practical recommendations. Strength and Cond J. 2020; 42(1): 24-38. doi: 10.1519/ SSC.0000000000000497.
van der Worp H, Vrielink JW, Bredeweg SW. Do runners who suffer injuries have higher vertical ground reaction forces than those who remain injury-free? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med. 2016; 50(8): 450-7.doi: 10.1136/ bjsports-2015-094924.
Schubert A, Kempf, J, Heiderscheit, BC. Influence of stride frequency and length on running mechanics: A systematic review. Sports Health. 2014; 6(3): 210-7. doi: 10.1177/ 1941738113508544.
Lenhart RL, Thelen DG, Wille CM, Chumanov ES, Heiderscheit BC. Increasing running step rate reduces patellofemoral joint forces. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2014; 46(3): 557-64. doi: 10.1249/ MSS.0b013e3182a78c3a.
Adams D, Pozzi F, Willy RW, Carrol A, Zeni J. Altering cadence or vertical oscillation during running: effects on running related injury factors. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2018; 13(4): 633-42. doi: 10.26603/ijspt20180633.
Musgjerd T, Anason J, Rutherford D, Kernozek TW. Effect of Increasing Running Cadence on Peak Impact Force in an Outdoor Environment. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2021; 16(4): 1076-83. doi: 10.26603/001c.25166.
Wang J, Luo Z, Dai B, Fu W. Effects of 12-week cadence retraining on impact peak, load rates and lower extremity biomechanics in running. Peer J. 2020; 8: e9813. doi: 10.7717/peerj.9813.
Boyer ER, Derrick TR. Lower extremity joint loads in habitual rearfoot and mid/forefoot strike runners with normal and shortened stride lengths. J Sports Sci. 2018; 36(5): 499-505. doi: 10.1080/02640414. 2017.1321775.
Popp KL, McDermott W, Hughes JM, Baxter SA, Stovitz SD, Petit MA. Bone strength estimates relative to vertical ground reaction force discriminates women runners with stress fracture history. Bone. 2017; 94: 22-8. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2016.10.006.
Willy RW, Buchenic L, Rogacki K, Ackerman J, Schmidt A, Willson JD. In-field gait retraining and mobile monitoring to address running biomechanics associated with tibial stress fracture. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2016; 26(2): 197-205. doi: 10.1111/ sms.12413.
Phan X, Grisbrook TL, Wernli K, Stearne SM, Davey P, Ng L. Running quietly reduces ground reaction force and vertical loading rate and alters foot strike technique. J Sports Sci. 2017; 35(16): 1636-42. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2016.1227466.
Karmen CL, Reisfeld MA, McIntyre MK, Timmermans R, Frishman W. The clinical value of heart rate monitoring using an apple watch. Cardiol Rev. 2019; 27(2): 60-2. doi: 10.1097/ CRD.0000000000000243.
Held NJ, Perrotta AS, Mueller T, Pfoh-MacDonald SJ. Agreement of the Apple Watch(R) and Fitbit Charge(R) for recording step count and heart rate when exercising in water. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2022; 60(5): 1323-31. doi: 10.1007/s11517-022- 02536.
Van Hooren B, Goudsmit J, Restrepo J, Vos S. Realtime feedback by wearables in running: Current approaches, challenges and suggestions for improvements. J Sports Sci. 2020; 38(2): 214-30. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2019.1690960.
Adams D, Pozzi F, Carroll A, Rombach A, Zeni J, Jr. Validity and Reliability of a Commercial Fitness Watch for Measuring Running Dynamics. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2016; 46(6): 471-6. doi: 10.2519/ jospt.2016.6391.
Prasartwuth O, Nanthoraphak N, Kaseantadanon A, Chawawisuttikool J, Phirawatthakul P Reliability and minimal detectable change of running parameters monitored by fitness watch and accelerometer. Thai J Phys Ther 2022; 44(2): 97-105.
Van Hooren B, Fuller JT, Buckley JD, Miller JR, Sewell K, Rao G, et al. Is motorized treadmill running biomechanically comparable to overground running? A systematic review and meta-analysis of cross-over studies. Sports Med. 2020; 50(4): 785-813. doi: 10.1007/s40279-019-01237-z.
Brahms CM, Zhao Y, Gerhard D, Barden JM. Stride length determination during overground running using a single foot-mounted inertial measurement unit. J Biomech. 2018; 71: 302-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech. 2018.02.003.
Benson LC, Clermont CA, Ferber R. New considerations for collecting biomechanical data using wearable sensors: the effect of different running environments. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2020; 8: 86. doi: 10.3389/ fbioe.2020.00086.
Sama AJ, Hillstrom H, Daluiski A, Wolff A. Reliability and agreement between two wearable inertial sensor devices for measurement of arm activity during walking and running gait. J Hand Ther. 2022; 35: 151-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2020.08.001.
Gouttebarge V, Wolfard R, Griek N, de Ruiter CJ, Boschman JS, van Dieën JH. Reproducibility and validity of the Myotest for measuring step frequency and ground contact time in recreational runners. J Hum Kinet. 2015; 45: 19-26.doi: 10.1515/ hukin-2015-0003.
Gindre C, Lussiana T, Hebert-Losier K, Morin J. Reliability and validity of the Myotest® for measuring running stride kinematics. J Sports Sci. 2016; 34(7): 664-70. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2015.1068436.