Evaluation of optimal kilovoltage-cone beam technique on image quality, registration accuracy, time of imaging and relative dose for head radiotherapy: A phantom study
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background: Image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT) has improved geometry accuracy of patient positioning in radiotherapy. Nowadays, a kilo-voltage cone-beam computed tomography (kV-CBCT) is widely applied in IGRT to confirm daily patient positioning. However, one problem with IGRT is the increased dose to normal tissue outside the target area. Reduction in the dose of kV-CBCT verification imaging leads to deterioration in image quality and registration results.
Objectives: The objective of this study was to evaluate an optimal kV cone-beam technique on image quality, registration accuracy, relative dose, and imaging time using different combinations of angular range, angular separation, and mA (in total eight protocols) in the head phantom.
Materials and methods: Catphan® 503 phantom was used to evaluate image quality and a PIXY Anthropomorphic Training/Teaching Phantom was used to verify image registration accuracy. The kV-CBCT imaging was performed using an X-ray volumetric imaging (XVI) system mounted on an Elekta Versa HD linear accelerator. The absorbed dose of kV-CBCT imaging was determined using the head phantom with an ionization chamber. The eight protocols were analyzed for image quality, image registration, relative dose change, and imaging delivery time.
Results: Image quality parameter results showed that maximum contrast to noise ratio (CNR) increased by approximately 65% at 100 kV, 20 mA, θ=360°, and Δθ=0.54°, while uniformity compared with 100 kV, 10 mA, θ=200°, Δθ=0.54° (default protocol) varied within 7%. The spatial resolution showed no change (0.167 cm), with geometric distortions of less than 0.2 mm. Image registration errors were within 0.2 cm, with the highest magnitude of error seen in the vertical direction. Imaging dose can be reduced using 100 kV, 10 mA, θ=200°, Δθ=1.09° about 50% and 100 kV, 10 mA, θ=360°, Δθ=1.09° about 15% with similar CNR of default protocol. Imaging time decreased by approximately 2-folds, while Δθ increased by 2-folds.
Conclusion: The suggested protocols suitable for optimal kV-CBCT image quality, accuracy of image registration, decreased imaging time, and reduced image dose in the head region were 1) 10 mA, θ=200°, Δθ=1.09° 2) 10 mA, θ=360°, Δθ=1.09°, and 3) 20 mA, θ=360°, Δθ=1.09°. These protocols decreased imaging dose about 50%, 15%, and 2%, respectively. The developing kV-CBCT technique should be counterbalanced by careful consideration of imaging dose, image quality, imaging time, and accuracy of image registration.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Personal views expressed by the contributors in their articles are not necessarily those of the Journal of Associated Medical Sciences, Faculty of Associated Medical Sciences, Chiang Mai University.
References
Guckenberger M. Image-guided radiotherapy based on kilovoltage cone-beam computed tomography – A review of technology and clinical outcome. Eur Oncol Haematol. 2011; 7(2): 121-4.
Scandurra D, Lawford CE. A dosimetry technique for measuring kilovoltage cone-beam CT dose on a linear accelerator using radiotherapy equipment. J App Cli Med Phys. 2014; 15(4): 80-92.
Pisani L, Lockman D, Jaffray D, Yan D, Martinez A, Wong J. Setup error in radiotherapy: on-line correction using electronic kilovoltage and megavoltage radiographs. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2000; 47(3): 825-39.
Devereux B, Frantzis J, Sisson T, Jones M, Martin J, Middleton M. A comparison of kV and imaging in head and neck imaged radiotherapy. Radiography. 2010; 16: 8-13.
Martin L, Couto JG, Barbosa B. Use of planar kV vs. CBCT in evaluation of setup errors in oesophagus carcinoma radiotherapy. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2016; 21: 57-62.
Cubillos Mesias M, Boda-Heggemann J, Thoelking J, Lohr F, Wenz F,Wertz H. Quantification and assessment of interfraction setup error based on cone beam CT and determination of safety margins for radiotherapy. Plos one. 2016; 1(3): 1-8.
Delishaj D, Ursino S, Pasqualetti F, Matteucci F, Cristaudo A, Doatti CP et al. Set-up errors in head and neck cancer treated with IMRT technique assessed by cone-beam computed tomography: a feasible protocol. Radiat Oncol J. 2018; 36(1): 54-62.
ICRU 60. Recommendations of the International Commission of Radiological Protection. Oxford, UK. Pergamon Press, 1991.
AAPM task group 180. Image Guidance Doses Delivered During Radiotherapy: Quantification, Management, and Reduction. Med Phys. 2018; 45(5): e88-99.
Men K, Dai J. A comprehensive evaluation of angular range and separation on image quality, image registration, and imaging dose for cone beam computed tomography in radiotherapy. Med Dosim. 2019; 44: 67-73.
Pinsatong N, Asavaphatiboon S, Tangboonduangjit P. Evaluation of image quality and radiation dose in kilovoltage cone beam computed tomography. J Phys:Conf Ser 1248. 2019: 012050.
Sykes JR, Amer A, Czajka J, Moore CJ. A feasibility study for image guided radiotherapy using low dose, high speed, cone beam X-ray volumetric imaging. Radiother Oncol. 2005; 77: 45-52.
Barber J, Sykers JR, Holloway L, Thwaites DI. Autometric image registration performance for two different CBCT systems; variation with imaging dose. J Phys: Conf Ser. 2014; 489: 012070.
Pauwels R, Silkosessak O, Jacobs R, Bogaerts R, Bosmans H, Panmekiate S. A pragmatic approach to determine the optimal kVp in cone beam CT: Balancing contrast-to-noise ratio and radiation dose. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2014; 43(5): 20140059.
Wood TJ, Moore CS, Horsfield CJ, Saunderson JR, Beavis AW. Accounting for patient size in the optimization of dose and image quality of pelvis cone beam CT protocols on the Varian OBI system. Br J Radiol. 2015; 88(1055): 20150364.
Yan H, Cervino L, Jia X, Jiang SB. A comprehensive study on the relationship between the image quilty and imaging dose in low-dose cone beam CT. Phys Med Biol. 2012; 57(7): 2063-80.
Takei Y, Monzen H, Mutsumoto K, Hanaoka K, Tamura M, Nishimura Y. Registration accuracy with the low dose kilovoltage cone-beam CT: A phantom study. BJR. 2019; 1: 20190028.
Lim SY, Zin HM. Quantitative image quality evaluation for kV cone-beam CT based IGRT. J Phys: Conf Ser. 2017; 815: 012029.
Held M, Cremers F, Sneed PK, Braunstien S, Fogh SE, Nakamura J et al. Assessment of image quality and dose calculation accuracy on kV CBCT, MV CBCT, and MV CT images for urgent palliative radiotherapy treatments. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2016; 17(2): 279-90.
The phantom laboratory. Catphan® 503 Manual; 2017.
Feldkamp LA, Davis LC, Kress JW. Practical cone-beam algorithm. J Opt Soc Am. 1984; 1(6): 612-9.
Hu W, Ye J, Wang J, Ma X, Zhang Z. Use of kilovoltage X-ray volume imaging in patient dose calculation for head-and-neck and partial brain radiation therapy. Radiat Oncol. 2010; 5: 29.
Lu B, Lu H, Palta J. A comprehensive study on decreasing the kilovoltage cone-beam CT dose by reducing the projection number. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2010; 11(3): 231-49.
Ding GX, Munro P, Pawlowski J, Malcolm A, Coffey CW. Reducing radiation exposure to patients from kV-CBCT imaging. Radiother Oncol. 2010; 97(3): 585-92.
Ding GX, Charles W, Coffey CW. Radiation dose from kilovoltage cone beam computed tomography in an image-guided radiotherapy procedure. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009; 73(2): 610-7.
Alaei P, Spezi E, Reynolds M. Dose calculation and treatment plan optimization including imaging dose from kilovoltage cone beam computed tomography. Acta Oncol. 2014; 53(6): 839-44.
Grelewicz Z, Wiersma RD. Combined MV + kV inverse treatment planning for optimal kV dose incorporation in IGRT. Phys Med Biol. 2014; 59(7): 1607-21.
Roxby P, Kron T, Foroudi F, Haworth A, Fox C, Mullen A et al. Simple methods to reduce patient dose in a Varian cone beam CT system for delivery verification in pelvic radiotherapy. Br J Radiol. 2009; 82(982): 855-9.