Development of a computer-based cognitive training game and usage feasibility with Thai stroke patients
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background: Cognitive impairments are common sequelae found in patients after a stroke event, leading them to necessitate long-term care. Currently, there are two common cognitive approaches, namely conventional intervention, and technology-based intervention, with the latter having become extensively used, especially in developed countries. In a developing country like Thailand, there is still a clear lack of usage of computer-based cognitive training and there is still a lack of research focus on investigating the feasibility of its usage with Thai stroke patients.
Objectives: This study aimed to develop a computer-based cognitive training game and investigate its feasibility for being used with Thai stroke patients
Materials and methods: This study was a developmental research design consisting of two phases. Phase one involved the development, content validity, and pilot use of our computer-based cognitive training game. The game contents were examined by three experts, who are occupational therapists with more than 5 years of experience with cognitive rehabilitation for stroke patients, to assure content validity. Phase two instead, involved the process of investigating the feasibility of using the newly developed computer-based cognitive training games with Thai stroke patients. Participants in this study were stroke patients with cognitive impairments identified with the Mental State Examination (MSET10) and who were familiar with the technology. Fourteen participants were asked to rate their overall experience with the newly developed game, the design, the convenience aspects, and the portability of the training material, by using The Test of Satisfaction on Computer-based Cognitive Game. Demographic characteristics and user experiences were analyzed by descriptive statistics.
Results: The newly developed computer-based cognitive training game, called CoWMeG, is a game-like training using simulated real-life activities whose design is based on the Thai ecosystem, and it consists of ten games. The game's contents involve working memory tasks, such as verbal, visuospatial, executive, and process speed skills-related tasks. Each game was designed to have different difficulty levels with each level consisting of three subsequential screen pages (i.e., instruction, playing, and scoring screen pages). Most of the participants rated their user experiences with CoWMeG as very satisfied, corresponding to 84.2 percent of the total answers on satisfaction.
Conclusion: In accordance with the obtained results, the newly developed computer-based cognitive training game, named CoWMeG, may represent a feasible tool to be used with Thai stroke patients who have cognitive impairments.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Personal views expressed by the contributors in their articles are not necessarily those of the Journal of Associated Medical Sciences, Faculty of Associated Medical Sciences, Chiang Mai University.
References
Division of Non-Communication Diseases [Internet]. Number and mortality rate of non-communicable diseases 2016 - 2018 [cited 2019 November 4]. Available from: http://www.thaincd.com/2016/mission/documents-detail.php?id=13653&tid=32&gid=1-020.
Katan M, Luft A. Global Burden of Stroke. Semin Neurol. 2018; 38(2): 208-11.
Wolfe CD. The impact of stroke. Br Med Bull. 2000; 56(2): 275-86.
Yousufuddin M, Young N. Aging and ischemic stroke. Aging. 2019; 11(9): 2542-4.
Yi X, Luo H, Zhou J, Yu M, Chen X, Tan L, et al. Prevalence of stroke and stroke related risk factors: A population based cross sectional survey in southwestern China. BMC Neurol. 2020; 20(1): 5.
Suwanwela NC. Stroke epidemiology in Thailand. J Stroke. 2014; 16(1): 1-7.
Bartels MN, Duffy CA, Beland HE. Pathophysiology, medical management and acute rehabilitation of stroke survivors. In: Gillen G, editor. Stroke rehabilitation: A function-based approach. 4th ed. St. Louis, Miss: Elsevier; 2016. p. 2-45.
Sun J-H, Tan L, Yu J-T. Post-stroke cognitive impairment: Epidemiology, mechanisms and management. Annals of translational medicine. 2014; 2(8): 80-.
Mani K, Cater B, Hudlikar A. Cognition and return to work after mild/moderate traumatic brain injury: A systematic review. Work. 2017; 58(1): 51-62.
Tatemichi TK, Desmond DW, Stern Y, Paik M, Sano M, Bagiella E. Cognitive impairment after stroke: frequency, patterns, and relationship to functional abilities. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1994; 57(2): 202-7.
Cicerone KD, Goldin Y, Ganci K, Rosenbaum A, Wethe JV, Langenbahn DM, et al. Evidence-based cognitive rehabilitation: Systematic review of the literature from 2009 through 2014. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2019; 100(8): 1515-33.
De Luca R, Calabrò RS, Bramanti P. Cognitive rehabilitation after severe acquired brain injury: Current evidence and future directions. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2018; 28(6): 879-98.
Chaiwong P, Rattakorn P, Munkhetvit P. Effects of cognitive training program on cognitive abilities and quality of life in elderly with suspected dementia. Journal of Associated Medical Sciences. 2015; 48(3): 182-91.
Khanthee R, Dhippayom JP, Munkhetvit P. Effects of cognitive training program on cognitive abilities in stroke patients. Journal of Associated Medical Sciences. 2016; 49(3): 298-306.
Pratoomtan D, Rattakorn P, Munkhetvit P. Effect of home-based cognitive training kit and satisfaction of elderly with mild cognitive impairment. The Journal of Occupational Therapist Association of Thailand. 2013; 18(3): 35-46.
Zoltan B. The use of computers and computerized technology in visual, perceptual, and cognitive retraining. In: Zoltan B, editor. Vision, perception, and cognition: A manual for the evaluation and treatment of the adult with acquired brain injury 4th ed. Thorofare, NJ: SLACK; 2007. p. 311-7.
Cho H-Y, Kim K-T, Jung J-H. Effects of computer assisted cognitive rehabilitation on brain wave, memory and attention of stroke patients: A randomized control trial. J Phys Ther Sci. 2015; 27(4): 1029-32.
Åkerlund E, Esbjörnsson E, Sunnerhagen KS, Björkdahl A. Can computerized working memory training improve impaired working memory, cognition and psychological health? Brain Inj. 2013; 27(13-14): 1649-57.
Cicerone KD, Langenbahn DM, Braden C, Malec JF, Kalmar K, Fraas M, et al. Evidence-based cognitive rehabilitation: Updated review of the literature from 2003 through 2008. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011; 92(4): 519-30.
Caprani N, O’Connor N, Gurrin C. Touch screens for the older user. In: Cheein FAA, editor. Aisstive Technologies: InTech; 2012. p. 96-118.
Mitzner TL, Boron JB, Fausset CB, Adams AE, Charness N, Czaja SJ, et al. Older adults talk technology: technology usage and attitudes. Comput Human Behav. 2010; 26(6): 1710-21.
Fager SK, Burnfield JM. Patients' experiences with technology during inpatient rehabilitation: opportunities to support independence and therapeutic engagement. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2014; 9(2): 121-7.
Thaivon T, Munkhetvit P. Effects of applications on computer tablet for cognitive training in stroke patients. ASEAN J Rehabil Med. 2020; 30(2): 47-53.
Juul J, editor The game, the player, the world: Looking for a heart of gameness. Digital Games Research Conference; 2003; University of Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Schmidt J, Lannin N, Fleming J, Ownsworth T. Feedback interventions for impaired self-awareness following brain injury: A systematic review. J Rehabil Med. 2011; 43(8): 673-80.
Benson J, Clark F. A guide for instrument development and validation. Am J Occup Ther. 1982; 36(12): 789-800.
Ward ME, De Brún A, Beirne D, Conway C, Cunningham U, English A, et al. Using co-design to develop a collective leadership intervention for healthcare teams to improve safety culture. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018; 15(6): 1182.
Wall KJ, Cumming TB, Koenig ST, Pelecanos AM, Copland DA. Using technology to overcome the language barrier: The cognitive assessment for aphasia app. Disabil Rehabil. 2018; 40(11): 1333-44.
Forsyth K, Taylor RR, Kramer JM, Prior S, Richie L, Whitehead J, et al. The model of human occuaption. In: Boyt Schell BA, Gillen G, Scaffa ME, editors. Willard & Spackman's occupational therapy 12th ed. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2014. p. 505-26.
Toglia JP. A dynamic interactional approach to cognitive rehabilitation. In: Katz N, editor. Cognition & occupation across the life span: Models for intervention in occupational therapy. 2nd ed. Bethesda, MD: American Occupational Therapy Association; 2005. p. 29-72.
Björkdahl A, Akerlund E, Svensson S, Esbjörnsson E. A randomized study of computerized working memory training and effects on functioning in everyday life for patients with brain injury. Brain Inj. 2013; 27(13-14): 1658-65.
Johansson B, Tornmalm M. Working memory training for patients with acquired brain injury: Effects in daily life. Scand J Occup Ther. 2012; 19(2): 176-83.
Lundqvist A, Grundström K, Samuelsson K, Rönnberg J. Computerized training of working memory in a group of patients suffering from acquired brain injury. Brain Inj. 2010; 24(10): 1173-83.
Vallat C, Azouvi P, Hardisson H, Meffert R, Tessier C, Pradat-Diehl P. Rehabilitation of verbal working memory after left hemisphere stroke. Brain Inj. 2005; 19(13): 1157-64.
Vallat-Azouvi C, Pradat-Diehl P, Azouvi P. Rehabilitation of the central executive of working memory after severe traumatic brain injury: Two single-case studies. Brain Inj. 2009; 23(6): 585-94.
Baddeley A. Working memory: theories, models, and controversies. Annu Rev Psychol. 2012; 63(1): 1-29.
Takeuchi H, Taki Y, Hashizume H, Sassa Y, Nagase T, Nouchi R, et al. Effects of training of processing speed on neural systems. J Neurosci. 2011; 31(34): 12139-48.
Vallat-Azouvi C, Pradat-Diehl P, Azouvi P. Modularity in rehabilitation of working memory: A single-case study. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2014; 24(2): 220-37.
Munkhetvit P. Theory and basic knowledge in evaluation. In: Munkhetvit P, editor. Occupational therapy evaluation Chaing Mai: Siampimnana; 2017. p. 1-24.
Unity. Unity game engine 2020 [cited 2021 July 16]. Available from: https://unity3d.com/.
Muskens L, van Lent R, Vijfvinkel A, van Cann P, Shahid S, editors. Never too old to use a tablet: designing tablet applications for the cognitively and physically impaired elderly2014; Cham: Springer International Publishing.
The Dementia Association of Thailand. Mission : Leader of dementia prevention and care in asia. Newsletter No10. 2018.
Psychological Software Service Inc. Cognitive rehabilitation therapy system: PSSCogRehab 2012 [cited 2021 August 5]. Available from: http://www.psychological-software.com/psscogrehab.html.
Park J-H, Park J-H. The effects of a Korean computer-based cognitive rehabilitation program on cognitive function and visual perception ability of patients with acute stroke. J Phys Ther Sci. 2015; 27(8): 2577-9.
Li K, Robertson J, Ramos J, Gella S. Computer-based cognitive retraining for adults with chronic acquired brain injury: A pilot study. Occup Ther Health Care. 2013; 27(4): 333-44.
Chellappan K, Mohsin NK, Ali SHBM, Islam MS, editors. Post-stroke brain memory assessment framework. 2012 IEEE-EMBS Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Sciences; 2012 17-19 Dec. 2012.
Fernandez E, Bergado Rosado JA, Rodriguez Perez D, Salazar Santana S, Torres Aguilar M, Bringas ML. Effectiveness of a computer-based training program of attention and memory in patients with acquired brain damage. Behav Sci (Basel). 2017; 8(1): 4.
Hagovská M, Dzvoník O, Olekszyová Z. Comparison of two cognitive training programs with effects on functional activities and quality of life. Res Gerontol Nurs. 2017; 10(4): 172-80.
Man DW, Chung JC, Lee GY. Evaluation of a virtual reality-based memory training programme for Hong Kong Chinese older adults with questionable dementia: a pilot study. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2012; 27(5): 513-20.
Faucounau V, Wu YH, Boulay M, De Rotrou J, Rigaud AS. Cognitive intervention programmes on patients affected by mild cognitive impairment: a promising intervention tool for MCI? J Nutr Health Aging. 2010; 14(1): 31-5.
Lumsden J, Edwards EA, Lawrence NS, Coyle D, Munafò MR. Gamification of cognitive assessment and cognitive training: A systematic review of applications and efficacy. JMIR Serious Games. 2016; 4(2): e11.
Guerreiro T, Nicolau H, Jorge J, Gonçalves D, editors. Towards accessible touch interfaces. 12th international ACM SIGAC-CESS conference on computers and accessibility; 2010; ACM.
Jin Z, Plocher T, Kiff L. Touch screen user interfaces for older adults: Button size and spacing. In: Stephanidis C, editor. Human computer interaction coping with diversity. 4554. Heidelberg: Springer; 2007. p. 933-41.
Muskens L, Lent Rv, Vijfvinkel A, Cann P, Shahid S, editors. Never too old to use a tablet: Designing tablet applications for the cognitively and physically impaired elderly. International Conference on Computers for Handicapped Persons; 2014.
Toglia JP. A dynamic interactional model to cognitive rehabilitation. In: Katz N, editor. Cognition and occupation in rehabilitation: Cognitive models for intervention in occupational therapy. Bethesda, MD: American Occupational Therapy Association; 1998. p. 5-50.
Alsawaier RS. The effect of gamification on motivation and engagement. The International Journal of Information and Learning Technology. 2018; 35(1): 56-79.
Pallavicini F, Ferrari A, Mantovani F. Video games for well-being: A systematic review on the application of computer games for cognitive and emotional training in the adult population. Front Psychol. 2018; 9: 2127.
Boyle EA, Hainey T, Connolly TM, Gray G, Earp J, Ott M, et al. An update to the systematic literature review of empirical evidence of the impacts and outcomes of computer games and serious games. Computers & Education. 2016; 94: 178-92.
Saleem R, Azeem M, Asif M. Effect of work motivation on job satisfaction in mobile telecommunication service organizations of Pakistan. International Journal of Business and Management. 2010; 5(11).
Corrado P, Tungjan P, Soy M. Professoriate’s motivation in Cambodian higher education. The International Journal of Educational Organization and Leadership. 2021; 28(2): 59-74.
Ryan RM, Rigby CS, Przybylski A. The motivational pull of video games: A self-determination theory approach. Motiv Emot. 2006; 30(4): 344-60.
Granic I, Lobel A, Engels RC. The benefits of playing video games. Am Psychol. 2014; 69(1): 66.
Miller GA. The magical number seven, plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychol Rev. 1956; 63(2): 81-97.
Kueider AM, Parisi JM, Gross AL, Rebok GW. Computerized cognitive training with older adults: A aystematic review. PLoS One. 2012; 7(7): e40588.