Reliability and validity of culturally adapted executive function performance test for Thai people with substance-induced disorders

Main Article Content

Sutinun Juntorn
Peeradech Thichanpiang
Thitiya Wangkawan
Supalak Khemthong
Narumon Phinmueangthong
Anuchart Kaunnil

Abstract

Background: Recently, the executive function assessment tools in Thailand are mainly administered as the bottom-up approach using separate tasks of client skills more than as the top-down approach using activities in daily life contexts. These bottom-up assessments are focused on the components of executive function which are not relevant to client’s participation in real situations.


Objectives: The aims of this study were to develop and appraise the standardization of Executive Function Performance Test in Thai version (EFPT-Th) which was culturally adapted as the performance-based executive function tests for Thai contexts.


Materials and methods: Back-translation process and expert’s agreement were introduced to develop EFPT-Th. Thirty participants diagnosed with substance-induced disorders were recruited to examine the internal consistency, intra-rater reliability and inter-rater reliability. Moreover, the criterion validity was analyzed by the correlation with Behavioral Assessment of the Dysexecutive Syndrome (BADS).


Results: The internal consistency of EFPT-Th was considered to be acceptable (Cronbach’s alpha=0.72). For intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of EFPT-Th total score demonstrated high level of coefficients (ICC=0.98 and 0.88, respectively). The criterion validity of EFPT-Th was reported significantly high negative correlations between the total EFPT-Th scores and the BADS total profile scores (r=-0.63, p<0.01).


Conclusion: The present study provides that EFPT-Th is the performance-based test of executive function which is culturally appropriate adaptation for Thai contexts. EFPT-Th also could be the benefit to occupational therapists to evaluate the executive function and determine the level of assistance for clients with executive dysfunction to engage in the instrumental activities or complex daily tasks.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Juntorn, S., Thichanpiang, P., Wangkawan, T., Khemthong, S., Phinmueangthong, N., & Kaunnil, A. (2020). Reliability and validity of culturally adapted executive function performance test for Thai people with substance-induced disorders. ournal of ssociated edical ciences, 54(1), 35-43. etrieved from https://he01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/bulletinAMS/article/view/244332
Section
Occupational Therapy

References

UNODC. World Drug Report 2017 [Available from: https://www.unodc.org/wdr2017/field/WDR_2017_presentation_lauch_version.pdf.

Yang Y, Raine A. Prefrontal structural and functional brain imaging findings in antisocial, violent, and psychopathic individuals: a meta-analysis. Psychiatry Res. 2009; 174(2): 81-8.

Miller EK, Freedman DJ, Wallis JD. The prefrontal cortex: categories, concepts and cognition. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2002; 357: 1123-36.

Bechara A, Dolan S, Denburg N, Hindes A, Anderson SW, Nathan PE. Decision-making deficits, linked to a dysfunctional ventromedial prefrontal cortex, revealed in alcohol and stimulant abusers. Neuropsychologia. 2001; 39(4): 376-89.

Grant S, Contoreggi C, London ED. Drug abusers show impaired performance in a laboratory test of decision making. Neuropsychologia. 2000; 38(8): 1180-7.

Schoenbaum G, Shaham Y. The role of orbitofrontal cortex in drug addiction: a review of preclinical studies. Biological psychiatry. 2008; 63(3): 256-62.

Cramm H, Krupa T, Missiuna C, Lysaght RM, Parker KC. Broadening the occupational therapy toolkit: An executive functioning lens for occupational therapy with children and youth. American Journal of Occupational Therapy. 2013; 67(6): e139-e47.

Hughes C, Ensor R. Executive function and theory of mind in 2 year olds: A family affair? Developmental neuropsychology. 2005; 28(2): 645-68.

Lezak M. Executive functions and motor performance. In neuropsychological assessment. 1995: 650-85.

Lezak MD, Howieson DB, Loring DW, Fischer JS. Neuropsychological assessment: Oxford University Press, USA; 2004.

Gutman SA, Diamond H, Holness-Parchment SE, Brandofino DN, Pacheco DG, Jolly-Edouard M, et al. Enhancing independence in women experiencing domestic violence and possible brain injury: An assessment of an occupational therapy intervention. Occupational Therapy in Mental Health. 2004; 20(1): 49-79.

Maeir A, Krauss S, Katz N. Ecological validity of the Multiple Errands Test (MET) on discharge from neurorehabilitation hospital. OTJR: occupation, participation and health. 2011; 31(1_suppl): S38-S46.

Reitan RM, Wolfson D. Category Test and Trail Making Test as measures of frontal lobe functions. The Clinical Neuropsychologist. 1995; 9(1): 50-6.

Wechsler D. Wechsler memory scale-revised. Psychological Corporation. 1987.

Wilson B, Alderman N, Burgess P, Emslie H, Evans J. Behavioural Assessment of the Dysexecutive Syndrome (BADS), Thames Valley Test Company. Bury St Edmunds, England. 1996.

Dawson DR, Anderson ND, Burgess P, Cooper E, Krpan KM, Stuss DT. Further development of the Multiple Errands Test: Standardized scoring, reliability, and ecological validity for the Baycrest version. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation. 2009; 90(11): S41-S51.

Baum C, Morrison T, Hahn M, Edwards D. Test manual: Executive function performance test. St Louis: MO: Washington University; 2003.

Goverover Y, Kalmar J, Gaudino-Goering E, Shawaryn M, Moore NB, Halper J, et al. The relation between subjective and objective measures of everyday life activities in persons with multiple sclerosis. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2005; 86(12): 2303-8.

Katz N, Tadmor I, Felzen B, Hartman-Maeir A. Validity of the Executive Function Performance Test in individuals with schizophrenia. OTJR: Occupation, Participation and Health. 2007; 27(2): 44-51.

Baum CM, Connor LT, Morrison T, Hahn M, Dromerick AW, Edwards DF. Validity, and Clinical Utility of the Executive Function Performance Test: A Measure of Executive Function in a Sample of People With Stroke. Am J Occup Ther 2008; 62(4): 446–55.

Raphael-Greenfield E. Assessing executive and community functioning among homeless persons with substance use disorders using the executive function performance test. Occupational Therapy International. 2012; 19(3): 135-43.

Kim H, Lee Y-N, Jo E-M, Lee E-Y. Reliability and validity of culturally adapted executive function performance test for Koreans with stroke. Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases. 2017; 26(5): 1033-40.

Conti J, Brucki SMD. Executive Function Performance Test: transcultural adaptation, evaluation of psychometric properties in Brazil. Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria. 2018; 76(11): 767-74.

Cederfeldt M, Widell Y, Andersson EE, Dahlin-Ivanoff S, Gosman-Hedström G. Concurrent Validity of the Executive Function Performance Test in People with Mild Stroke. The British Journal of Occupational Therapy. 2011; 74: 443-9.

Cederfeldt M, Carlsson G, Dahlin–Ivanoff S, Gosman–Hedstrom G. Inter-rater reliability and face validity of the Executive Function Performance Test (EFPT). Br J Occup Ther. 2015; 78(9): 563-9.

Waltz JA, Schweitzer JB, Ross TJ, Kurup PK, Salmeron BJ, Rose EJ, et al. Abnormal responses to monetary outcomes in cortex, but not in the basal ganglia, in schizophrenia. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2010; 35(12): 2427-39.

Baum C, Edwards D. Cognitive Performance in Senile Dementia of the Alzheimer’s Type: The Kitchen Task Assessment. Am J Occup Ther 1993; 47(5): 431-6.

Abreu B, Duval M, Gerber D, Wood W. Occupational performance and the functional approach. In: Royeen C, editor. AOTA self-study series: cognitive rehabilitation Rockville: Md; 1994. p. 61-102.

Loewenstein DA, Rubert MP, Argüelles T, Duara R. Neuropsychological test performance and prediction of functional capacities among Spanish-speaking and English-speaking patients with dementia. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology. 1995; 10(2): 75-88.

O'Carroll OCR. An examination of the relationship between executive function, memory, and rehabilitation status in schizophrenia. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation. 1998; 8(3): 229-41.

Evans J, Chua S, McKenna P, Wilson B. Assessment of the dysexecutive syndrome in schizophrenia. Psychological Medicine. 1997; 27(3): 635-46.

Norris G, Tate RL. The Behavioural Assessment of the Dysexecutive Syndrome (BADS): Ecological, concurrent and construct validity. Neuropsychological rehabilitation. 2000; 10(1): 33-45.

Dvir D, Raz T, Shenhar AJ. An empirical analysis of the relationship between project planning and project success. International journal of project management. 2003; 21(2): 89-95.

Marinus J, Visser M, Stiggelbout AM, Rabey JM, Martínez-Martín P, Bonuccelli U, et al. A short scale for the assessment of motor impairments and disabilities in Parkinson’s disease: the SPES/SCOPA. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry. 2004;7 5(3): 388-95.

Brown T, Chien C-W. Top-down or bottom-up occupational therapy assessment: which way do we go? : SAGE Publications Sage UK: London, England; 2010.