Main Article Content
Background: Physical inactivity in young people which increases with age have been linked to increased risks of non-communicable diseases. Therefore, assessment and monitoring of physical activity (PA) in young populations is needed. However, a valid and feasible self-report measure for large-scale PA for Thai children and adolescents is limited.
Objectives: To determine the content validity and psychometric characteristics of the Thai translated version of the Physical Activity Questionnaire for Children (PAQ-C) and Adolescents (PAQ-A).
Materials and methods: The 10-item of PAQ-C and 9-item of PAQ-A were translated into a Thai version and the cross-cultural adaptations were included. These questionnaires were conducted with children aged 8-<14 years and adolescents aged 14-<20 years that were recruited from one large private and two public schools in Amphur Muang, Chiang Mai Province. Each group of children and adolescents was classified by age, gender, and school type, equally. After that, the content validity was assessed using a content validity index. Furthermore, psychometric characteristics, including the scale’s internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and agreement of measurements were also determined.
Results: Both PAQs had an excellent content validity index for scale (S-CVI was 0.91 for PAQ-C and 0.96 for PAQ-A) with an acceptable content validity index for item (I-CVI) ranging from 0.83-1.00. The internal consistency and the reproducibility of measurements of the PAQs were acceptable (α = 0.71, ICC = 0.67 for PAQ-C and α=0.84, ICC=0.78 for PAQ-A; P<0.001). The standard error of measurement (SEM) between the two trials for administration of both PAQs were smaller than the smallest detectable change (SDC) (SEM=0.36, SDC=0.99 for PAQ-C; SEM=0.35, SDC=0.96 for PAQ-A).
Conclusion: Having an excellent content validity and acceptable psychometric properties, both PAQ-C and PAQ-A have the potential to be applied for research purposes and surveillance of PA in Thai children and adolescents.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Personal views expressed by the contributors in their articles are not necessarily those of the Journal of Associated Medical Sciences, Faculty of Associated Medical Sciences, Chiang Mai University.
 Amornsriwatanakul A, Nakornkhet K, Katewongsa P, Choosakul C, Kaewmanee T, Konharn K, et al. Results from Thailand's 2016 report card on physical activity for children and youth. J Phys Act Health. 2016;13(11 Suppl 2): S291-S8.
 Amornsriwatanakul A, Lester L, Bull FC, Rosenberg M. "Are Thai children and youth sufficiently active? prevalence and correlates of physical activity from a nationally representative cross-sectional study". Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017;14(1):72. DOI: 10.1186/s12966-017-0529-4.
 Liangruenrom N, Suttikasem K, Craike M, Bennie JA, Biddle SJH, Pedisic Z. Physical activity and sedentary behaviour research in Thailand: a systematic scoping review. BMC Public Health. 2018;18(1):733. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-018-5643-y.
 Biddle SJ, Gorely T, Pearson N, Bull FC. An assessment of self-reported physical activity instruments in young people for population surveillance: Project ALPHA. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2011;8:1. DOI: 10.1186/1479-5868-8-1.
 Gobbi E, Elliot C, Varnier M, Carraro A. Psychometric properties of the Physical Activity Questionnaire for Older Children in Italy: Testing the validity among a general and clinical pediatric population. PLoS One. 2016;11(5):e0156354.
 Isa T, Sawa R, Torizawa K, Murata S, Saito T, Ebina A, et al. Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Physical Activity Questionnaire for Older Children. Clin Med Insights Pediatr. 2019;13:1179556519835833.
 Thomas EL, Upton D. Psychometric properties of the Physical Activity Questionnaire for Older Children (PAQ-C) in the UK. Psychol Sport Exerc. 2014; 15(3): 280-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2014.02.002.
 Wang JJ, Baranowski T, Lau WP, Chen TA, Pitkethly AJ. Validation of the Physical Activity Questionnaire for Older Children (PAQ-C) among Chinese children. Biomed Environ Sci. 2016;29(3):177-86. DOI: 10.3967/bes2016.022.
 Janz KF, Lutuchy EM, Wenthe P, Levy SM. Measuring activity in children and adolescents using self-report: PAQ-C and PAQ-A. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008;40(4):767-72. DOI: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181620ed1.
 Aggio D, Fairclough S, Knowles Z, Graves L. Validity and reliability of a modified english version of the Physical Activity Questionnaire for Adolescents. Arch Public Health. 2016;74:3. DOI: 10.1186/s13690-016-0115-2.
 Bervoets L, Noten CV, Van Roosbroeck S, Hansen D, Van Hoorenbeeck K, Verheyen E, et al. Reliability and validity of the Dutch Physical Activity Questionnaires for Children (PAQ-C) and Adolescents (PAQ-A). Arch Public Health. 2014; 72(1): 47.
 Benítez-Porres J, López-Fernández I, Raya JF, Álvarez Carnero S, Alvero-Cruz JR, Álvarez Carnero E. Reliability and validity of the PAQ-C questionnaire to assess physical activity in children. J Sch Health. 2016; 86: 677-85.
 Voss C, Dean PH, Gardner RF, Duncombe SL, Harris KC. Validity and reliability of the Physical Activity Questionnaire for Children (PAQ-C) and Adolescents (PAQ-A) in individuals with congenital heart disease. PLoS One. 2017;12(4):e0175806. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0175806.
 Moore JB, Hanes JC, Barbeau P, Gutin B, Treviño RP, Yin Z. Validation of the Physical Activity Questionnaire for Older Children in children of different races. Pediatr Exerc Sci 2007; 19(1): 6-19.
 Sousa VD, Rojjanasrirat W. Translation, adaptation and validation of instruments or scales for use in cross-cultural health care research: a clear and user-friendly guideline. J Eval Clin Pract. 2011; 17(2): 268-74. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01434.x.
 Kowalski KC, Crocker PRE, Donen RM. The Physical Activity Questionnaire for Older Children (PAQ-C) and Adolescents (PAQ-A) manual. Canada: University of Saskatchewan; 2004.
 Kowalski KC, Crocker PRE, Faulkner RA. Validation of the Physical Activity Questionnaire for Older Children. Pediatr Exerc Sci 1997; 9(2): 174-86.
 Gauthier AP, Lariviere M, Young N. Psychometric properties of the IPAQ: a validation study in a sample of northern Franco-Ontarians. . J Phys Act Health.
 Polit DF, Beck CT. The content validity index: are you sure you know what's being reported? Critique and recommendations. Res Nurs Health. 2006;29(5):489-97.
 Koo TK, Li MY. A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med. 2016; 15(2): 155-63.
 Taber KS. The use of cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Res Sci Educ. 2017; 48(6): 1273-96. DOI 10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2.
 Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, van der Windt DA, Knol DL, Dekker J, et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007; 60(1): 34-42.
 Sally JF. Self-report measures of children's physical activity. J Sch Health. 1991; 61: 215–19.
 Welk GJ, Corbin CB, Dale D. Measurement issues in the assessment of physical activity in children. Res Q Exerc Sport 2000; 71 Suppl 2: 59-73.
 Benitez-Porres J, Alvero-Cruz JR, Sardinha LB, Lopez-Fernandez I, Carnero EA. Cut-off values for classifying active children and adolescentes using the Physical Activity Questionnaire: PAQ-C and PAQ-A. Nutr Hosp. 2016; 33(5): 564. DOI: 10.20960/nh.564.
 Voss C, Ogunleye AA, Sandercock GR. Physical Activity Questionnaire for Children and Adolescents: English norms and cut-off points. Pediatr Int. 2013;55(4):498-507. DOI: 10.1111/ped.12092.
 Kolle E, Steene-Johannessen J, Andersen LB, Anderssen SA. Seasonal variation in objectively assessed physical activity among children and adolescents in Norway: a cross-sectional study. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2009; 6: 36.