A review of brain mapping performance-based neuroergonomic evaluation for Thais
Main Article Content
Abstract
A novel test called "brain mapping performance" (BMP) was developed by psychosocial occupational therapists to encourage explicit learning throughout the lifetime. For those who have not been convinced of the benefits of emerging neuroergonomics, the evaluation of job readiness appears to be challenging. Each person's level of intrinsic brain capacity for leadership BMP can be explained by encouraging soft skills, culminating in eustress and empathy engagement. This article aims to provide how the BMP-based neuroergonomic evaluation is interpreted on social comprehension and enhancement of mirror neuron morality (MNM). This article contributes an integrative approach of MNM which has been further compared between the pre- and post- evaluation of the BMP-based neuroergonomics for improving the job readiness and leadership of those Thai people linked to a healthy workplace and well-explicit learning organization.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Parasuraman R, Wilson GF. Putting the brain to work: neuroergonomics past, present, and future. Hum Factors 2008;50(3):468-74. doi: 10.1518/001872008X288349
Mijović P, Ković V, De Vos M, Mačužić I, Jeremić B, Gligorijević I. Benefits of instructed responding in manual assembly tasks: an ERP approach. Front Hum Neurosci. 2016;10. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00171
Mijović P, Ković V, De Vos M, Mačužić I, Todorović P, Jeremić B, et al. Towards continuous and real-time attention monitoring at work: reaction time versus brain response. Ergonomics. 2017;60(2):241-254. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2016.1142121
Alyan E, Saad NM, Kamel N, Rahman MA. Workplace design-related stress effects on prefrontal cortex connectivity and neurovascular coupling. Appl Ergon. 2021;96:103497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2021.103497.
Ismail LE, Karwowski W. Applications of EEG indices for the quantification of human cognitive performance: A systematic review and bibliometric analysis. PLos One. 2020;15(12):e0242857. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0242857
Wascher E, Reiser JA-O, Rinkenauer G, Larrá M, Dreger FA, Schneider D, et al. Neuroergonomics on the go: an evaluation of the potential of mobile EEG for workplace assessment and design. Hum Factors 2023;65(1):86-106.
Dehais F, Lafont A, Roy R, Fairclough S. A neuroergonomics approach to mental workload, engagement and human performance. Front Neurosci 2020;14.268.
DePaul GA. Nine practices of 21st century leadership: a guide for inspiring creativity, innovation, and engagement. United States: Taylor & Francis; 2023.
Nardi D. Neuroscience of personality: brain savvy insights for all types of people. United States: Radiance House; 2011.
Ohreen D. A critical review of mirror neurons in business ethics : they don’t reflect as much as you think. J Appl Ethics Philos 2021;12:8-18. https://doi.org/10.14943/jaep.12.8
Thanyawatpornkul R, Khemthong S, Chatthong W. Scoping review on brain mapping leadership and talent engagement. Indian J Public Health Res Dev 2022;13(4):199-204. https://doi.org/10.37506/ijphrd.v14i4.18592
Plachy RJ, Smunt TL. Rethinking managership, leadership, followership, and partnership. Bus Horiz 2022;65(4):401-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2021.04.004
Rodríguez Y, Pérez E, Robertson MM. Ergonomic maturity model: a tool for integrating ergonomics/human factors into organizations. Work 2022;73:S279-S92. doi: 10.3233/WOR-211142
Amadi EO, Wariowei RE. The Impact of office ergonomics on the job performance of the educational manager. BW Academic Journal 2022;1(1):10.
Kopańska M, Ochojska D, Dejnowicz-Velitchkov A, Banaś-Ząbczyk A. Quantitative electroencephalography (QEEG) as an Innovative diagnostic tool in mental disorders. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(4):2465. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19042465
Chatthong W, Khemthong S, Wongsawat Y. Brain mapping performance as an occupational therapy assessment aid in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Am J Occup Ther 2020;74(2):1-7. doi: 10.5014/ajot.2020.035477.
Chatthong W, Khemthong S, Wongsawat Y. Neuropsychological classification based on brain mapping performance in Thai children with and without ADHD. Appl Neuropsychol Child 2022;11(1):18-24. doi: 10.1080/21622965.2020.1729155
Ahmed S, Qamar F, Soomro SA. Ergonomic work from home and occupational health problems amid COVID-19. Hum Syst Manag 2022;41:535-51. doi: 10.3233/HSM-211548
Cetrano G, Tedeschi F, Rabbi L, Gosetti G, Lora A, Lamonaca D, et al. How are compassion fatigue, burnout, and compassion satisfaction affected by quality of working life? Findings from a survey of mental health staff in Italy. BMC Health Serv Res 2017;17(1):755. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2726-x
Martinez W, Benerradi J, Midha S, Maior HA, Wilson ML, editors. Understanding the Ethical Concerns for Neurotechnology in the Future of Work; 2022.
Ghani A, Kaliappen N, Jermsittiparsert K. Enhancing Malaysian SME employee work engagement: the mediating role of job crafting in the presence of task complexity, self-efficacy and autonomy. Int J Innov Creativity Chang 2019;6(11):1-18.
Moore JR, Maxey EC, Waite AM, Wendover JD. Inclusive organizations: developmental reciprocity through authentic leader-employee relationships. J Manag Dev 2020;39(9):1029-39. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMD-05-2019-0211
Pater R. MINDING THE GAP: Overcoming the strains (& Sprains) of psychosocial contributors. Prof Saf. 2022;67(6):14-9.
Chatthong W, Khemthong S, Wongsawat Y. A design thinking model based on quantitative electroencephalography in social emotional learning for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Mind Brain Educ 2020;14(2):104-13. https://doi.org/10.1111/mbe.12235
Mehta R, Parasuraman R. Neuroergonomics: a review of applications to physical and cognitive work. Front Hum Neurosci 2013;7:889. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00889
Sarter N, Sarter M. Neuroergonomics: opportunities and challenges of merging cognitive neuroscience with cognitive ergonomics. Theor Issues Ergon Sci 2003;4(1-2):142-50. https://doi.org/10.1080/1463922021000020882
Powers JC, Bieliaieva K, Wu S, Nam CS. The human factors and ergonomics of P300-based brain-computer interfaces. Brain Sci. 2015;5(3):318-56. doi: 10.3390/brainsci5030318
Nam CS. Brain–computer interface (BCI) and ergonomics. Ergonomics. 2012;55(5):513-5. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2012.676675
Gehrke L, Lopes P, Klug M, Akman S, Gramann K. Neural sources of prediction errors detect unrealistic VR interactions. J Neural Eng 2022;19(3). doi: 10.1088/1741-2552/ac69bc
Borghetti L, Rhodes LJ, Morris MB, editors. Fatigue leads to dynamic shift in fronto-parietal sustained attention network 2022;66(1):606-610. https://doi.org/10.1177/1071181322661056
Young C, Hamilton-Wright A, Oliver ML, Gordon KD. Predicting wrist posture during occupational tasks using inertial sensors and convolutional neural networks. Sensors. 2023;23(2):942. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23020942
Ekstrom MJC. Mirror neurons and empathy: a biomarker for the complementary system; 2021.
Caiazzo C, Savković M, Djapan M, Vukićević A, Jovičić M, Mačužić I. Framework of modular industrial workstations for neuroergonomics experiments in a collaborative environment; 2022. doi: 10.3850/978-981-18-5183-4_J01-07-285-cd