Psychometric Properties of the Comprehensive Simulation Evaluation Survey for Nursing students: Thai version
Keywords:
Translation, Psychometric PropertiesTesting, Comprehensive Evaluation Survey, Simulation Based Teaching, Nursing StudentsAbstract
This research aimed to translate and investigate the psychometric propertiesof the Thai versionof
the Comprehensive Simulation Evaluation Survey for nursing students (ThaiCSES-NS). The process of
cross-culturally translation comprised offivesteps:(1) forward translation to Thai, (2) review of the translated
version, (3) backward translation, (4) compare the original version with the back-translated version and
(5) performpretesting. Study samplewas one hundred nine nursing students who used high-fidelity patient
simulation to enhancetheir learning. The research instruments were personal information questionnaires and
the Thai Comprehensive Simulation Evaluation Survey for nursing students. The data was analyze dusing
descriptive statistic and item analysis.
The study results revealed that the Thai CSES-NSis equivalent in content and sematic as compared to the
original version. Experts determined that the instrument has content validity. The content validity for item
[I-CVI]) were. 80-1.00, content validity for scale [S-CVI]) was. 95, and average congruency percentage
[ACP]) was. 95. The item analysis showed that the Cronbach's Alpha was .91, the range of corrected Item-total
correlation between .30-.68, and the Cronbach's Alpha if item deleted were .90-.91. The research findings
indicated that the Thai CSES-NShad high content validity and reliability. It can be used for evaluating in
teaching and learning in nursing by high-fidelity patient simulation.
References
Chaichanawirote, U.,&Vantum, C. (2017). Evaluation of
content validity for research instrument. Journal
of Nursing and Health Sciences, 11(2). 105-111.
[In Thai].
Cowperthwait, A. (2020). NLN/Jeffries simulation
framework for simulated participant methodology.
Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 42, 12-21.
Foronda, C., Alhusen, J., Budhathoki, C., Lamb, M.,
Tinsley, K., Macwilliams, B., ... Bauman, E.
(2015). A mixed-methods, international, multisite
study to develop and validate a measure of
nurse-to-physician communication in simulation.
Nursing Education Perspectives, 36(6), 383-388.
Jeffries, P. R., Rodgers, B., & Adamson, K. (2015).
NLN Jeffries simulation theory: brief narrative
description. Nursing Education Perspectives,
(5), 292-293.
Jones, P. S., Lee, J. W., Philips, L. R., Zhang, X. E.,
& Jaceldo, K. B. (2001). An adaptation of Brislin’
s translation model for cross-cultural research.
Nursing Research, 50(5), 300-304.
Kadhim, J. J. (2013). Comparing the effectiveness of
debriefing methods in high fidelity simulation in a
nursing baccalaureate program. Master thesis,
Valparaiso University, USA. Retrieved 1 September
from https://scholar.valpo.edu/msn_theses/2/
Kittiteerasack, P., Matthews, A. K., & Steffen, A. (2019).
The validity and linguistic testing of translated
measures of sexual orientation and gender identity
for research in lesbian, gay, bisexual, and
transgender (LGBT) populations in Thailand.
Nursing Journal, 46(4), 122-137. [In Thai].
Krejcie, R. V. & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining
sample size for research Activities. Journal of
Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30,
-610.
Kunaviktikul, W. (2015). Teaching and learning in the
discipline of nursing in the 21st century. Nursing
Journal, 42(2), 152-156. [in Thai].
Leighton, K., Mudra, V., & Gilbert, G. E. (2018).
Facilitator Competency Rubric. Retrieved 1
September 2021 from https://studylib.net/doc/
/facilitator-competency-rubric.
Leighton, K., Ravert, P., Mudra, V., & Macintosh, C.
(2015). Update the Simulation Effectiveness
Tool: Item modifications and reevaluation of
psychometricproperties. Nursing Education
Perspectives, 36(5), 317-323.
Nunally, J.C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric
Theory. New York: McGraw Hill.
Phongphanngam, S., &Lach, H. W. (2019). Cross-cultural
instrumenttranslation and adaptation: Challenges
and strategies. Pacific Rim Int J Nur Res, 23(2),
-179.
Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2012). Nursing Research:
generating and assessing evidence for nursing
practice (9th ed.). New York: Lippincott Williams
& Wilkins.
Polit, D. F., & Beck, C.T. (2014). Essentials of Nursing
Research: appraising evidence for nursing
practice (8th ed.). New York: Lippincott Williams
& Wilkins.
Spector, P. E. (1992). Summated Rating Scale Construction:
An Introduction. Newbury Park, CL: SAGE
publications.
Reising, D. L., Carr, D. E., Tieman, S., Feather, R. &
Ozdogan, Z. (2015). Psychometric testing of a
simulation rubric for measuring interprofessional
communication. Nursing Education Perspective,
(5), 311-316.
Schmidt, N., & Brown, J. M. (personal communication,
January, 12, 2021). Comprehensive Simulation
Evaluation Survey. College of Nursing and Health
Profession, Valparaiso University. USA.
Srisatidnarakul, B. (2014). Translation of nursing
research instrument in foreign language and
Psychometric property testing. Journal of
Research and Curriculum Development, 4(2),
-61. [In Thai].
Tiansawad, S. (2019). Instrument development for
nursing research. Chiang Mai: Siampimnana.
[In Thai].
Unjai, S., &Somjaivong, B. (2016). Translation and
reliability of the supportive care need survey Thai
version in cervical cancer patients. Journal of
Nursing Sciences & Health, 39(3), 119-126.
[In Thai].
Wongsutin, R., Meeboon, S., Sukolpuk, M., Teerawongsa,
N., Sirisabjanan,L., & Tojun, S. (2019). Nursing
students' perceptions on high-fidelity simulation
learning and learning outcomes regarding
Thailand qualification framework. Journal of
Health Science Research, 13(2), 11-19. [In Thai].
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Journal of Nursing and Health Sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
