EFFECT OF DIFFERENT RECOVERY POSTURES ON METABOLIC, HEMODYNAMIC AND VENTILATORY RESPONSES TO HIGH-INTENSITY EXERCISE

Authors

  • Haruthai PETVISET College of Sports Science and Technology, Mahidol University, 999 Phuttamonthon 4 Road, Salaya, Nakhon Pathom 73170, Thailand.
  • Metta PINTHONG College of Sports Science and Technology, Mahidol University, 999 Phuttamonthon 4 Road, Salaya, Nakhon Pathom 73170, Thailand.
  • Rungchai CHUANCHAIYAKUL College of Sports Science and Technology, Mahidol University, 999 Phuttamonthon 4 Road, Salaya, Nakhon Pathom 73170, Thailand.

Keywords:

hemodynamic/ventilation/metabolism/ recovery postures.

Abstract

This aim of the study was to investigate and compare the effects of recovery postures, upright-seated position and 45 degree leg raising, on ventilation and hemodynamic and metabolism responses after high-intensity exercise. Eleven male volunteers (mean ± SD: age, 20.18 ± 0.70 yr) completed the 45 min high-intensity intermittent exercise on a treadmill. Immediately after exercise, each subject was assigned to recover in a seated or leg-raised position for 15 min in a randomized order. Each subject then performed two experimental trials separated by at least 1 week. Minute ventilation (VE), tidal volume (VT), breathing frequency (BF), oxygen consumption (VO2), carbon dioxide production (VCO2), respiratory exchange ratio (RER), rate pressure product (RPP) and heart rate (HR) were monitored via a portable metabolic test system (Oxycon Mobile, Germany) and telemetry heart rate monitor (Polar, Finland). VE, VT, BF, VO2, VCO2, RER, HR, and arterial blood pressure variables at baseline rest and during exercise were not different between upright-seated and leg raising recovery trials. Post-exercise systolic blood pressure (p < 0.05) and arterial pulse pressure (P<0.01) were greater for the leg raising recovery compared with the seated recovery. The change in heart rate after high-intensity intermittent exercise was less in the leg raising recovery (p < 0.05) and the  heart rate was lower compared with the seated condition (p < 0.01). During recovery, VO2, respiratory discomfort, and BF were higher in leg raising position when compared with upright-seated position but VT in leg raising position was lower than upright-seated position (p < 0.05). However, VE, diastolic, mean arterial blood pressure, VCO2, RER and RPP were not influenced by the tested recovery postures (p > 0.05). In conclusion, these data show a greater benefit of recovery in 45 degree leg raising position compared with upright-seated position for reducing cardiovascular strains after high-intensity intermittent exercise. However, a higher respiratory discomfort was observed in leg raising position.

(J. Sports Sci. Technol 2011; 11 (2): 91–105)

Key words: hemodynamic/ventilation/metabolism/ recovery postures.

Downloads

Published

2012-01-12

Issue

Section

Research Article