Usefulness of ambulatory ECG monitoring for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in patients presenting with palpitation

Main Article Content

Surachat Jaroonpipatkul
Apichai Pokawattana

Abstract

In this study, the focus was on exploring the prevalence of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) among patients presenting with palpitations, utilizing the method of 24-hour ambulatory electrocardiographic (ECG) monitoring. The research encompassed 248 participants, predominantly comprising females (75.8%), with an average age of 52.18 years, most of whom fell within the 50 - 59 age bracket. Prior to medical examination, the duration of palpitations ranged from 1 to 3 months for the majority of patients. The study's findings unveiled that 4.84% of the patients exhibited atrial fibrillation, while 1.61% showcased atrial flutter. Interestingly, the youngest individual diagnosed with AF was merely 43 years old. The investigation further delved into factors associated with a heightened prevalence of atrial fibrillation. Notably, advancing age was correlated with an increased risk of AF (odds ratio [OR] 1.064, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.015 - 1.115, p < 0.005), along with the presence of valvular heart disease (OR 19.00, 95% CI 4.23 - 85.37, p < 0.005) and other structural heart diseases (OR 12.56, 95% CI 3.12 - 50.51, p < 0.005). This study underscores the significance of 24-hour ambulatory ECG monitoring in detecting a higher prevalence of atrial fibrillation compared to standard ECG testing. Additionally, it emphasizes the pivotal role of this monitoring technique in AF detection, particularly among older patients presenting with valvular or structural heart diseases, thus highlighting the importance of timely and accurate diagnosis in enhancing patient care and outcomes.

Article Details

How to Cite
1.
Jaroonpipatkul S, Pokawattana A. Usefulness of ambulatory ECG monitoring for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in patients presenting with palpitation. JMPH4 [internet]. 2025 Mar. 14 [cited 2025 Mar. 17];15(1):91-7. available from: https://he01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/JMPH4/article/view/263974
Section
Original Articles

References

Paudel B, Paudel K. The diagnostic significance of the holder monitoring in the evaluation of palpitation. Journal of clinical and diagnostic research 2013 Mar;7(3):480-3

Primo J, Gonçalves H, Macedo A, Russo P, Monteiro T, Guimarães J, et al. Prevalence of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in a population assessed by continuous 24-hour monitoring. Rev Port Cardiol. 2017 Jul 19;36(7-8):535-46

Stanley JM. Pharmacological treatment of persistent atrial fibrillation in the older adult: evidence-based practice. J Am Acad Nurse Pract 2011;23:120-6

Panchmatia S. Atrial fibrillation and the use of antiarrhythmic drugs. Nurse Prescribing 2010;8:207

Nottingham, F. Diagnosis and treatment of atrial fibrillation in the acute care setting. J Am Acad Nurse Pract 2010;22:280-7

Sittisuk S. Practice guidelines for management patients with Atrial Fibrillation (AF) in Thailand. Bangkok :The Heart Association of Thailand under the Royal Patronage, 2012.

Aditya MS, Chandra KS. Practical Approach to the Patient with Palpitation. The Association of Physician on India[Internet].[cited 2017 Mar 16].Available from: http://www.apiindia.org/pdf/ progress_in_ medicine_2017/mu_14.pdf

David A Fitzmaurice , F D Richard Hobbs, Sue Jowett, Jonathon Mant, Ellen T Murray, Roger Holder, et al. , et al. Screening versus routine practice in detection of atrial fibrillation in patients aged 65 or over: cluster randomized controlled trial. BMJ 2007;335:83.

Farce M, Malum ASMHA, Siddiqui MMR, Faruk MT, Rahman F, Iqbal MJ, et al. Different types of cardiac arrhythmias shown in Holter ECG monitoring of 100 patients studied in NICVD. Medicine today 2014; 26(2):71-4

Michael H. Crawford, Steven J. Bernstein, Prakash C. Deedwania, et al. ACC/AHA Guidelines For Ambulatory Electrocardiography. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 1999;34(3):912-48.