Agreement between Results of Shear Wave Elastography of the Liver and Serological Findings for Direct Acting Antivirals in Chronic Hepatic C Infection Treatment Guideline

Main Article Content

Rujiluck Rojthamromg

Abstract

Hepatitis C infection has the potential to trigger liver fibrosis progression, significantly impacting patient management decisions. However, the traditional gold standard for diagnosis, liver biopsy, is limited by inherent constraints. Consequently, alternative methods, such as serology-based assessments and ultrasound, have been proposed. The serology methods encompass Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) to platelet index (APRI) and the Fibrosis index based on the four factors (Fibrosis-4 index; FIB-4), while ultrasound offers an accurate measurement of liver stiffness.


On August 5, 2022, the Thai government gazette introduced new guidelines for the initiation of direct-acting antiviral drugs (DAA regimens) in the treatment of chronic hepatitis C infection, which includes specific criteria. Despite this, limited research exists comparing 2D-SWE and serology methods, especially in the context of applying the new guidelines. Consequently, the relationship between these diagnostic approaches remains unexplored, necessitating further investigation to optimize diagnostic and treatment decisions for patients with hepatitis C-related liver fibrosis. The purpose of this study is to assess the agreement between the results obtained from 2D-SWE and serology methods concerning the application of the new guideline criteria. A cross-sectional study of patients with hepatitis C infection in Pranangklao Hospital who were sent to 2D-SWE for liver stiffness evaluation in December 2022- May 2023. Ultrasound findings and serology data were recorded and analyzed for agreement of three methods In this study, 91.8% of the 49 examined patients met the liver stiffness criteria as per the new guidelines. The agreement between 2D-SWE and FIB-4 (75.51%) was notably higher than that between 2D-SWE and APRI (57.14%). Visual appearance of cirrhosis, splenic size, gender, and BMI were identified as significant factors contributing to discordant results between 2D-SWE and FIB-4. Regarding the new guideline criteria, a significant level of agreement has been observed between 2D-SWE and FIB-4, surpassing that seen between 2D-SWE and APRI. Notably, certain factors are associated with false-negative outcomes in both serology methods, such as the visual appearance of cirrhosis and splenic size. Additionally, FIB-4 shows correlations with false-negative results based on specific factors, including female gender and body mass index.

Article Details

How to Cite
1.
Rojthamromg R. Agreement between Results of Shear Wave Elastography of the Liver and Serological Findings for Direct Acting Antivirals in Chronic Hepatic C Infection Treatment Guideline. JDPC3 [internet]. 2024 Mar. 5 [cited 2025 Apr. 11];18(1):14-25. available from: https://he01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/JDPC3/article/view/264948
Section
OriginalArticle

References

World Health Organization. Global Hepatitis Report 2017. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/2550162017.

Yano M, Kumada H, Kage M, Ikeda K, Shimamatsu K, Inoue O, et al. The long-term pathological evolution of chronic hepatitis C. Hepatology. 1996; 23(6): 1334-40.

Intraobserver and interobserver variations in liver biopsy interpretation in patients with chronic hepatitis C. The French METAVIR Cooperative Study Group. Hepatology. 1994; 20(1): 15-20.

Rockey DC, Caldwell SH, Goodman ZD, Nelson RC, Smith AD, American Association for the Study of Liver D. Liver biopsy. Hepatology. 2009; 49(3): 1017-44.

Xiao G, Yang J, Yan L. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of aspartate aminotransferase to platelet ratio index and fibrosis-4 index for detecting liver fibrosis in adult patients with chronic hepatitis B virus infection: a systemic review and meta-analysis. Hepatology. 2015; 61(1): 292-302.

Wai CT, Greenson JK, Fontana RJ, Kalbfleisch JD, Marrero JA, Conjeevaram HS, et al. A simple noninvasive index can predict both significant fibrosis and cirrhosis in patients with chronic hepatitis C. Hepatology. 2003; 38(2): 518-26.

Udompap P, Sukonrut K, Suvannarerg V, Pongpaibul A, Charatcharoenwitthaya P. Prospective comparison of transient elastography, point shear wave elastography, APRI and FIB-4 for staging liver fibrosis in chronic viral hepatitis. J Viral Hepat. 2020; 27(4): 437-48.

Liaqat M, Siddique K, Yousaf I, Bacha R, Farooq SMY, Gilani SA. Comparison between shear wave elastography and serological findings for the evaluation of fibrosis in chronic liver disease. J Ultrason. 2021; 21(86): e186-e93.

Singh S, Muir AJ, Dieterich DT, Falck-Ytter YT. American Gastroenterological Association Institute Technical Review on the Role of Elastography in Chronic Liver Diseases. Gastroenterology. 2017; 152(6): 1544-77.

Puigvehi M, Broquetas T, Coll S, Garcia-Retortillo M, Canete N, Fernandez R, et al. Impact of anthropometric features on the applicability and accuracy of FibroScan((R)) (M and XL) in overweight/obese patients. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017; 32(10): 1746-53.

Wong GL, Wong VW, Chim AM, Yiu KK, Chu SH, Li MK, et al. Factors associated with unreliable liver stiffness measurement and its failure with transient elastography in the Chinese population. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011; 26(2): 300-5.

Hong EK, Choi YH, Cheon JE, Kim WS, Kim IO, Kang SY. Accurate measurements of liver stiffness using shear wave elastography in children and young adults and the role of the stability index. Ultrasonography. 2018; 37(3): 226-32.

Ryu H, Ahn SJ, Yoon JH, Lee JM. Inter-platform reproducibility of liver stiffness measured with two different point shear wave elastography techniques and 2-dimensional shear wave elastography using the comb-push technique. Ultrasonography. 2019; 38(4): 345-54.

Ryu H, Ahn SJ, Yoon JH, Lee JM. Reproducibility of liver stiffness measurements made with two different 2-dimensional shear wave elastography systems using the comb-push technique. Ultrasonography. 2019; 38(3): 246-54.

Sigrist RMS, Liau J, Kaffas AE, Chammas MC, Willmann JK. Ultrasound Elastography: Review of Techniques and Clinical Applications. Theranostics. 2017; 7(5): 1303-29.

Bota S, Herkner H, Sporea I, Salzl P, Sirli R, Neghina AM, et al. Meta-analysis: ARFI elastography versus transient elastography for the evaluation of liver fibrosis. Liver Int. 2013; 33(8): 1138-47.

Leung VY, Shen J, Wong VW, Abrigo J, Wong GL, Chim AM, et al. Quantitative elastography of liver fibrosis and spleen stiffness in chronic hepatitis B carriers: comparison of shear-wave elastography and transient elastography with liver biopsy correlation. Radiology. 2013; 269(3): 910-8.

Friedrich-Rust M, Poynard T, Castera L. Critical comparison of elastography methods to assess chronic liver disease. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016; 13(7): 402-11.

Yoo HW, Kim SG, Jang JY, Yoo JJ, Jeong SW, Kim YS, et al. Two-dimensional shear wave elastography for assessing liver fibrosis in patients with chronic liver disease: a prospective cohort study. Korean J Intern Med. 2022; 37(2): 285-93.

Announcement of the national drug system developemental committee, National List of Essential Drugs 2022 AD in Thailand, 139. Sect. Part 182ง (2022, August 5).

Barr RG, Wilson SR, Rubens D, Garcia-Tsao G, Ferraioli G. Update to the Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound Liver Elastography Consensus Statement. Radiology. 2020; 296(2): 263-74.

Chen LD, Xu HX, Xie XY, Xie XH, Xu ZF, Liu GJ, et al. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and hepatocellular carcinoma: differential diagnosis with contrast-enhanced ultrasound. Eur Radiol. 2010; 20(3): 743-53.

Papadopoulos N, Vasileiadi S, Papavdi M, Sveroni E, Antonakaki P, Dellaporta E, et al. Liver fibrosis staging with combination of APRI and FIB-4 scoring systems in chronic hepatitis C as an alternative to transient elastography. Ann Gastroenterol. 2019; 32(5): 498-503.

Ferraioli G, Tinelli C, Dal Bello B, Zicchetti M, Filice G, Filice C, et al. Accuracy of real-time shear wave elastography for assessing liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C: a pilot study. Hepatology. 2012; 56(6): 2125-33.

Di Lelio A, Cestari C, Lomazzi A, Beretta L. Cirrhosis: diagnosis with sonographic study of the liver surface. Radiology. 1989; 172(2): 389-92.

Cardi M, Muttillo IA, Amadori L, Petroni R, Mingazzini P, Barillari P, et al. Superiority of laparoscopy compared to ultrasonography in diagnosis of widespread liver diseases. Dig Dis Sci. 1997; 42(3): 546-8.

Kudo M, Zheng RQ, Kim SR, Okabe Y, Osaki Y, Iijima H, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of imaging for liver cirrhosis compared to histologically proven liver cirrhosis. A multicenter collaborative study. Intervirology. 2008; 51 Suppl 1:17-26.

Kashani A, Salehi B, Anghesom D, Kawayeh AM, Rouse GA, Runyon BA. Spleen size in cirrhosis of different etiologies. J Ultrasound Med. 2015; 34(2): 233-8.

Thomas DL, Astemborski J, Rai RM, Anania FA, Schaeffer M, Galai N, et al. The natural history of hepatitis C virus infection: host, viral, and environmental factors. JAMA. 2000; 284(4): 450-6.

van der Meer AJ VB, Feld JJ, Wedemeyer H, Dufour JF, Lammert F, et al. Association between sustained virological response and all-cause mortality among patients with chronic hepatitis C and advanced hepatic fibrosis. JAMA. 2012; 308(24): 2584-93.

Bhattacharya D, Aronsohn A, Price J, Lo Re V, Panel A-IHG. Hepatitis C Guidance 2023 Update: AASLD-IDSA Recommendations for Testing, Managing, and Treating Hepatitis C Virus Infection. Clin Infect Dis. 2023.