Integrating modern educational technologies in Basic Life Support (BLS) Training for village health volunteers: an analysis of influencing factors and efficiency enhancement strategies in the context of Uttaradit Province, Thailand 10.55131/jphd/2025/230210
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This research aimed to investigate the factors influencing Basic Life Support (BLS) teaching methods for Village Health Volunteers (VHVs) in Uttaradit Province, Thailand, with a focus on analyzing the impact of modern educational technologies. A mixed-methods approach was employed, with a sample of 500 VHVs. Data were collected through questionnaires, skill tests, and interviews, and analyzed using descriptive statistics, multiple regression analysis, and structural equation modeling. Results revealed that modern educational technology had the highest positive influence on BLS teaching effectiveness (β = 0.375, p < .001), followed by teaching methods (β = 0.289, p < .001), instructor characteristics (β = 0.246, p < .001), learning environment (β = 0.214, p < .001), and socio-cultural factors (β = 0.178, p < .001), respectively. Based on these findings, we recommend: (1) implementing a blended learning approach that combines virtual reality simulation with traditional hands-on practice to optimize skill retention, (2) developing mobile learning applications with offline capabilities to address infrastructure limitations in rural areas, (3) establishing standardized instructor training programs emphasizing technology integration and culturally sensitive teaching methods, and (4) creating community-based learning environments that facilitate continuous skill practice and peer support. These evidence-based recommendations can enhance BLS training effectiveness for VHVs in Uttaradit Province and potentially across similar contexts in Southeast Asia.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Yan S, Gan Y, Jiang N, Wang R, Chen Y, Luo Z, et al. The global survival rate among adult out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients who received cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care. 2020;24(1):61.doi: 10.1186/ s13054-020-2773-2
Ong MEH, Perkins GD, Cariou A. Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: prehospital management. Lancet. 2018;391 (10124):980-988. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30316-7
Tanaka H, Ong MEH, Siddiqui FJ, Ma MHM, Kaneko H, Lee KW, et al. Modifiable Factors Associated With Survival After Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest in the Pan-Asian Resuscitation Outcomes Study. Ann Emerg Med. 2018;71(5):608-617.e15. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2017.07.484
Sittichanbuncha Y, Prachanukool T, Sawanyawisuth K, Chattakul P. Factors associated with outcomes of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in Thailand. Resusc Plus. 2020;4:100049.
Khunsri S, Pakpour AH, Chen CY, Lin CY. Factors associated with performing cardiopulmonary resuscitation among bystanders: A cross-sectional study in Thailand. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(20):7575.
Wongpakaran R, Suansanae T, Tan-ariya P, Laosee O, Akahori K. Effectiveness of blended learning for basic life support and automated external defibrillator training in Thailand: A cluster-randomized controlled trial. Int J Nurs Stud. 2023; 138:104398. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon. 2023.e21680
Zhang C, Yan X, Zhang L, Liu Y, Tang W, Li Y. The effectiveness of virtual reality simulation in cardiopulmonary resuscitation training for medical students: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2023;18(1): e0280545. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05720-8
Cheng A, Nadkarni VM, Mancini MB, Hunt EA, Sinz EH, Merchant RM, et al. Resuscitation Education Science: Educational Strategies to Improve Outcomes From Cardiac Arrest: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2020;138(6):e82-e122. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000583
Taylor DC, Hamdy H. Adult learning theories: Implications for learning and teaching in medical education: AMEE Guide No. 83. Med Teach. 2023;35(11):e1561-e1572. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2013.828153
Greif R, Bhanji F, Bigham BL, Bray J, Breckwoldt J, Cheng A, et al. Education, Implementation, and Teams: 2020 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science with Treatment Recommendations. Resuscitation. 2020;156:A188-A239. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2020.09. 014
Smereka J, Szarpak L, Czekajlo M, Abelson A, Zwolinski P, Plusa T, et al. The TrueCPR device in the process of teaching cardiopulmonary resuscitation: A randomized simulation trial. Medicine. 2019;98(27):e15995. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000015995
Creswell JW, Poth CN. Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Fifth ed. SAGE Publications, Inc. March 29, 2024.
Krejcie RV, Morgan DW. Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement. 1970;30(3):607-610. doi: 10.1177/001316447003000308
Ozturk C, Muslu GK, Dicle A. A comparison of problem-based and traditional education on nursing students' critical thinking dispositions. Nurse Educ Today. 2020;85:104268. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2007.10.001
Cox E. Andragogy and self-directed learning: Pillars of adult learning theory. New Dir Adult Cont Educ. 2022;2022(173):15-26.
Baek M, Yoo H, Lee J, Ahn J, Oh J. Psychometric properties of a self-efficacy scale for basic life support. Nurse Educ Today. 2019;77:51-56.
Greif R, Bhanji F, Bigham BL, Bray J, Breckwoldt J, Cheng A, et al. Education, Implementation, and Teams: 2020 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science with Treatment Recommendations. Resuscitation. 2020;156:A188-A239. doi: 10.1016/ j.resuscitation.2020.09.014
Creswell JW, Poth CN. Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. 5th ed. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, Inc. 2023.
Kallio H, Pietilä AM, Johnson M, Kangasniemi M. Systematic methodological review: developing a framework for a qualitative semi‐structured interview guide. J Adv Nurs. 2016;72(12):2954-2965.
Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS. Using multivariate statistics. 7th ed. Pearson. 2019.
Kline RB. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. 5th ed. Guilford Press; 2022.
Braun V, Clarke V. Thematic analysis: A practical guide. SAGE Publications, Inc. 2021.
Lin Y, Cheng A, Grant VJ, Currie GR, Hecker KG. Improving CPR quality with distributed practice and real-time feedback in pediatric healthcare providers – A randomized controlled trial. Resuscitation2018;130:6-12. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2018.06.025
Olasveengen TM, Semeraro F, Ristagno G, Castren M, Handley A, Kuzovlev A, et al. European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Basic Life Support. Resuscitation. 2021;161:98-114. doi: 10.1016/ j.resuscitation.2021.02.009
Pellegrino JL, Bogumil D, Epstein JL, Burke RV. Two-thumb-encircling advantageous for lay responder infant CPR: a randomised manikin study. Arch Dis Child. 2019;104(6):530-534. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2018-314893
Semeraro F, Scapigliati A, Ristagno G, Luciani A, Gandolfi S, Lockey A, et al. Virtual reality for CPR training: How cool is that? Dedicated to the "next generation". Resuscitation. 2017;121: e1-e2. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation. 2017.09.024
Nas J, Thannhauser J, Vart P, van Geuns RJ, Muijsers HEC, Mol JQ, et al. Effect of Face-to-Face vs Virtual Reality Training on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Quality: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Cardiol. 2020;5(3):328-335. doi: 10.1001/ jamacardio.2019.499229.
