The roles of public service motivation and humble leadership in promoting work engagement among healthcare professionals 10.55131/jphd/2025/230108
Main Article Content
Abstract
Work engagement is the central issue for healthcare employees not only in preventing occupational stress but also in improving job performance. The purpose of this study is to examine if work engagement can be enhanced by public service motivation and humble leadership. The snowball sampling approach was used for building a healthcare professional sample of physicians and nurses. Instruments used in self-administered questionnaires were validated and commonly utilized in previous studies with appropriate reliability. The model fit indices (χ2 = 449.308; df = 227; χ2/df = 1.979; CFI = 0.935; TLI = 0.928; RMSEA = 0.063) and factor loadings (ranging from 0.64 to 0.86) indicated satisfactory reliability and validity of the constructs and their indicators. The findings demonstrated positive and significant path coefficients between public service motivation and work engagement (b = 0.218, p < 0.001). Humble leadership also exhibited a significantly positive relationship with work engagement (b = 0.231, p < 0.001). The findings further revealed that humble leadership served as a moderator to attenuate the relationship between public service motivation and work engagement (b = -0.140, p < 0.01). The positive nexus between public service motivation and work engagement was found to be stronger when healthcare supervisors demonstrated low levels of humble leadership. As such, this study advances the healthcare management literature by gaining insights into work engagement among healthcare professionals. An essential contribution to existing knowledge has been made by examining the relationships that exist between public service motivation, humble leadership, and work engagement. Based on the results, healthcare organizations should implement relevant policies in terms of recruitment and training to foster public service motivation and humble leadership in order to promote work engagement.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Lee TH. How US health care got safer by focusing on the patient experience. Harvard Business Review. 2017 [Internet]. [Cited 2024 May 15].
Available from: https://hbr.org/ 2017/05/how-u-s-health-care-got-safer-by-focusing-on-the-patient-experience
Das SR, Sultana S, Abedin ES, Chowdhury AA, Haque MI. Mental health status and associated factors with stress among healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study. J Public Hlth Dev. 2024;22(1):93-109. doi: 10.55131/ jphd/2024/220108
Ritz A, Brewer GA. Does societal culture affect public service motivation? Evidence of sub-national differences in Switzerland. Int Public Manag J. 2013;16(2):224–51. doi: 10.1080/10967494.2013.817249
Schaufeli WB, Bakker AB. Defining and measuring work engagement: Bringing clarity to the concept. Work engagement: a handbook of essential theory and research. New York: Psychology Press. 2010:10-24.
Ministry of Health. Innovation of serving manner and attitude of health officials toward the satisfaction of patients [Internet]. [Cited 2024 August 1]. Available from: https:// luatminhkhue.vn/en/decision-no--2151-qd-byt-dated-june-04--2015-of-the-ministry-of-health-approving-the-plan-for-implementation-of--innovation-of-serving-manner-and-attitude-of-health-officials-toward-the-satisfaction-o.aspx.
National assembly. Law on Medical Examination and Treatment [Internet]. [Cited 2024 August 1]. Available from: https://lawnet.vn/en/vb/Law-15-2023-QH15-medical-examination-and-treatment-87FB7.html
Noesgaard MS, Hansen JR. Work engagement in the public service context: The dual perceptions of job characteristics. Int J Publ Adm. 2018;41(13):1047–60. doi: 10.1080/ 01900692.2017.1318401
Wee KZ, Lai AY. Work engagement and patient quality of care: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Med Care Res Rev. 2022;79(3):345-58. doi: 10.1177/10775587211030388
Gupta V, Agarwal UA, Khatri N. The relationships between perceived organizational support, affective commitment, psychological contract breach, organizational citizenship behaviour and work engagement. J Adv Nurs. 2016;72(11):2806–2817. doi: 10.1111/jan.13043
Szilvassy P, Širok K. Importance of work engagement in primary healthcare. BMC Health Serv Res. 2022;22(1):1044. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08402-7
Deng J, Liu J, Guo Y, Gao Y, Wu Z, Yang T. How does social support affect public service motivation of healthcare workers in China: the mediating effect of job stress. BMC Public Health. 2021;21(1):1076. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-19470/v1
O’leary C. Public service motivation: A rationalist critique. Public Personnel Management. 2019;48(1):82-96. doi: 10.1177/0091026018791962
Allen GP, Moore WM, Moser LR, Neill KK, Sambamoorthi U, Bell HS. The role of servant leadership and transformational leadership in academic pharmacy. American journal of pharmaceutical education. 2016; 80(7):113. doi: 10.5688/ajpe807113
Destler KN. A matter of trust: Street level bureaucrats, organizational climate and performance management reform. J Publ Admin Res Theory. 2017;27(3):517-34. doi: 10.1093/ jopart/muw055
Vu TA, Plimmer G, Berman E, Sabharwal M. Managing employee performance in transition economies: A study of Vietnamese public organizations. Publ Admin Dev. 2019;39(2):89-103. doi: 10.26686/ wgtn.17135195
Salehzadeh R, Ziaeian M. Advancing our understanding of humble leadership in healthcare: a scoping review. Leadership Health Serv (Bradf Engl). 2024;ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print). doi: 10.1108/LHS-07-2023-0050
Rainey HG, Steinbauer P. Galloping elephants: Developing elements of a theory of effective government organizations. J Publ Admin Res Theory. 1999;9(1):1-32. doi:10.1093/ oxfordjournals.jpart.a024401
Perry JL, Wise LR. The motivational bases of public service. Public Admin Rev. 1990:367-73. doi: 10.2307/976618
Vandenabeele W. Toward a public administration theory of public service motivation: An institutional approach. Publ Man Rev. 2007;9(4):545-556. doi: 10.1080/14719030701726697
Schott C, Neumann O, Baertschi M, Ritz A. Public service motivation, prosocial motivation and altruism: Towards disentanglement and conceptual clarity. Inter J Publ Admin. 2019;42(14),1200–1211. doi: 10.1080/ 01900692.2019.1588302
Bakker AB. A job demands-resources approach to public service motivation. Public Adm Rev. 2015;75(5):723–732. doi: 10.1111/puar.12388
Perry JL, Brudney JL, Coursey D, Littlepage L. What drives morally committed citizens? A study of the antecedents of public service motivation. Public Adm Rev. 2008; 68(3):445–458. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2008.00881.x
Zahari N, Kaliannan M. Antecedents of work engagement in the public sector: A systematic literature review. Rev Publ Pers Adm. 2023;43(3):557-582. doi: 10.1177/0734371X221106792
Stefurak T, Morgan R, Johnson RB. The relationship of public service motivation to job satisfaction and job performance of emergency medical services professionals. Public Pers Man. 2020;49(4):590-616. doi: 10.1177/0091026020917695
Borst RT. Comparing work engagement in people-changing and people-processing service providers: A mediation model with red tape, autonomy, dimensions of PSM, and performance. Publ Pers Man. 2018;47(3):287–313. doi: 10.1177/ 0091026018770225
Borst RT, Kruyen PM, Lako CJ. Exploring the job demands–resources model of work engagement in government: Bringing in a psychological perspective. Rev Public Pers Adm. 2019;39(3):372–397. doi: 10.1177/0734371X17729870
Yang K, Zhou L, Wang Z, Lin C, Luo Z. Humble leadership and innovative behaviour among Chinese nurses: The mediating role of work engagement. J Nurs Manag. 2019;27(8):1801–1808. doi: 10.1111/jonm.12879
Owens BP, Johnson MD, Mitchell TR. Expressed humility in organizations: Implications for performance, teams, and leadership. Organ Sci. 2013;24(5):1517–1538. doi: 10.1287/ orsc.1120.0795
Bakker AB, Demerouti E. The job demands‐resources model: State of the art. Journal of managerial psychology. 2007;22(3):309-328. doi: 10.1108/ 02683940710733115
Owens BP, Hekman DR. How does leader humility influence team performance? Exploring the mechanisms of contagion and collective promotion focus. Acad Manage J. 2016;59(3):1088–1111. doi: 10.5465/ amj.2013.0660
Cho J, Schilpzand P, Huang L, Paterson T. How and when humble leadership facilitates employee job performance: the roles of feeling trusted and job autonomy. J Leadership Org Studies. 2021;28(2):169-84. doi: 10.1177/ 1548051820979634
Cooke DK, Brant KK, Woods JM. The role of public service motivation in employee work engagement: A test of the job demands-resources model. Int J Publ Adm. 2019;42(9):765–75. doi: 10.1080/01900692.2018.1517265
Walters KN, Diab DL. Humble leadership: Implications for psychological safety and follower engagement. J Lead. Stud. 2016; 10(2):7–18. doi: 10.1002/jls.21434
Alamri M. Transformational leadership and work engagement in public organizations: promotion focus and public service motivation, how and when the effect occurs. Leadersh Organ Dev J. 2023;44(1):137–55. doi: 10.1108/LODJ-12-2021-0544
Kelemen TK, Matthews SH, Matthews MJ, Henry SE. Humble leadership: A review and synthesis of leader expressed humility. Journal of Organizational Behavior. 2023 Feb; 44(2):202-24. doi: 10.1002/job.2608
Mussagulova A. Predictors of work engagement: Drawing on job demands–resources theory and public service motivation. Aust J Publ Adm. 2021;80(2):217–238. doi: 10.1111/ 1467-8500.12449
Hair JF, Hult GTM, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M. A primer on partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications. 2014
Doan LP, Boyer L, Auquier P, Fond G, Tran B, Latkin CA, et al. Social and economic impacts of COVID-19 among health professionals in Vietnam: Status and associations with quality of life and sleep quality. J Epidemiol Glob Health. 2023;13(4):842–56. doi: 10.1007/ s44197-023-00156-7
Brislin RW. Back-translation for cross-cultural research. J Cross-Cult Psychol. 1970;1(3):185–216. doi: 10.1177/ 135910457000100301.
Perry JL. Measuring public service motivation: An assessment of construct reliability and validity. J Public Adm Res Theory. 1996;6(1):5–22. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024303
Schaufeli WB, Bakker AB, Salanova M. The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire: A cross-national study. Educ Psychol Meas. 2006;66(4):701–716. doi: 10.1177/0013164405282471
Giallouros G, Nicolaides C, Gabriel E, Economou M, Georgiou A, Diakourakis M. Enhancing employee engagement through integrating leadership and employee job resources: evidence from a public healthcare setting. Int Publ Manag J. 2023;7(4):533-558. doi: 10.1080/10967494.2023.2215754
Anderson JC, Gerbing DW. Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychol Bull. 1988; 103(3):411–423. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411
Carmines E, McIver J. Analyzing models with unobserved variables: Analysis of covariance structures. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications. 1981.
Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS. Using Multivariate Statistics (5th ed.) New York: Allyn and Bacon. 2007.
Hu LT, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary J. 1999;6(1):1-55. doi:10.1080/107055 19909540118
Gefen D, Straub D. A practical guide to factorial validity using PLS-Graph: Tutorial and annotated example. Communications of the Association for Information systems. 2005;16(1):91-109. doi: 10.17705/1cais.01605
Bao Y, Li C, Zhao H. Servant leadership and engagement: a dual mediation model. J Man Psychol. 2018;33(6):406–417. doi: 10.1108/ JMP-12-2017-0435
Kroll A, Vogel D. The psm-leadership fit: A model of performance information use. Public Adm. 2014; 92(4):974–91. doi: 10.1111/padm. 12014
Potipiroon W, Ford MT. Does public service motivation always lead to organizational commitment? Examining the moderating roles of intrinsic motivation and ethical leadership. Public Pers Man. 2017;46(3):211–38. doi: 10.1177/ 0091026017717241
Hasan AA, Ahmad SZ, Osman A. Transformational leadership and work engagement as mediators on nurses’ job performance in healthcare clinics: work environment as a moderator. Leadersh Health Serv. 2023;36(4):537–61. doi: 10.1108/LHS-10-2022-0097
Kartal N. Evaluating the relationship between work engagement, work alienation and work performance of healthcare professionals. Int J Healthc Manag. 2018;11(3):251–259. doi: 10.1080/20479700.2018.1453969
Al Badi FM, Cherian J, Farouk S, Al Nahyan M. Work engagement and job performance among nurses in the public healthcare sector in the United Arab Emirates. J Asia Bus Stud. 2023; 17(5):1019-1041. doi: 10.1108/JABS-06-2022-0216
Long NLH, Ho VA. Determinants of perceived organizational support: An empirical study of administrative staff at public hospitals in Vietnam. J Public Hlth Dev. 2021;19(1):186-96.
Owens BP, Hekman DR. Modeling how to grow: An inductive examination of humble leader behaviors, contingencies, and outcomes. Academy Manag J. 2012;55(4):787-818. doi: 10.5465/amj.2010.0441
Gonçalves L, Brandão F. The relation between leader’s humility and team creativity: The mediating effect of psychological safety and psychological capital. Internat J Org Analysis. 2017;25(4):687-702. doi: 10.1108/ijoa-06-2016-1036
Cable D. How humble leadership really works. Harvard Business Review. 2018 [Internet]. [Cited 2024 August 4]. Available from: https://hbr.org/ 2018/04/how-humble-leadership-really-works
Afshan G, Kashif M, Khanum F, Khuhro MA, Akram U. High involvement work practices often lead to burnout, but thanks to humble leadership. J Manag Dev. 2021;40(6):503-25. doi: 10.1108/jmd-10-2020-0311
Aarons GA, Ehrhart MG, Torres EM, Finn NK, Beidas RS. The humble leader: Association of discrepancies in leader and follower ratings of implementation leadership with organizational climate in mental health. Psychiatric Serv. 2017;68(2):115-122. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201600062
Kellett P, Fitton C. Supporting transvisibility and gender diversity in nursing practice and education: embracing cultural safety. Nursing Inquiry. 2017;24(1):e12146. doi: 10.1111/nin.12146