Developing a tool to assess women’s knowledge and attitude toward managing prediabetes 10.55131/jphd/2025/230103
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Prediabetes is a state caused by insulin resistance, resulting in higher blood glucose levels. The incidence of diabetes mellitus can increase when this condition is not adequately treated. Therefore, this study aimed to develop questionnaire that can assess knowledge and attitude toward prediabetes management. The descriptive study that includes validity and reliability tests. The content validity test used 10 panelists of public health nutritionists and nutrition education experts. Meanwhile, face validity used 10 participants, and reliability test included 30 adult women participants. Content validity index (CVI) and kappa statistics score were also adopted in this study. Face validity was carried out by calculating the impact score while reliability test used Cronbach's alpha. The content validity of knowledge component questionnaire was analyzed separately for the clarity (CVI = 0.44 – 0.88) and relevance aspect (CVI = 0.77 – 1). The result of the kappa statistic showed 10 items questions in the low category, and each 5 items had a sufficient and very good rating. The face validity assessment with impact score analysis, ranged from 3.0 – 4.6. The analysis of correlation (p-value < 0.05) was carried out on 7 questions items. Reliability test using using Cronbach's alpha showed a coefficient of 0.642. Furthermore, content validity analysis of attitude component questionnaire was performed separately for clarity (CVI = 0.727 – 1) and relevance aspect (CVI = 0.909 – 1). The result of the kappa statistic showed 2 items statement in low and 18 in very good category. Face validity with impact score analysis ranged from 2.5 - 3.1, and the correlation analysis (p-value < 0.05) on the 6-items statement had a Cronbach's alpha of 0.772. The study conclusion that knowledge and attitude questionnaire prediabetes management had good validity and reliability in adult women group.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Bansal N. Prediabetes diagnosis and treatment: A review. World J Diabetes. 2015;6(2):296. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v6.i2. 296.
Rett K, Gottwald-Hostalek U. Understanding prediabetes: definition, prevalence, burden and treatment options for an emerging disease. Curr Med Res Opin. 2019; 9(35): 1529-1534. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2019. 1601455.
Fatema K, Hossain S, Natasha K, Chowdhury HA, Akter J, Khan T, et al. Knowledge attitude and practice regarding diabetes mellitus among Nondiabetic and diabetic study participants in Bangladesh. BMC Public Health. 2017;17(1):1–10. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4285-9
Sahai S, Vyas D, Sharma S. Impaired fasting glucose: A study of its prevalence documented at a tertiary care centre of central India and its association with anthropometric variables. J Indian Acad Clin Med. 2011;12(3):188–92.
Kemenkes. Hasil Riset Kesehatan Dasar (Riskesdas) 2018. Jakarta: Kemenkes RI; 2018.
Nuryani, Muhdar IN, Ramadhani F, Paramata Y, Adi DI B. Association of Physical Activity and Dietary Patterns with Adults Abdominal Obesity in Gorontalo Regency, Indonesia: A Cross-Sectional Study. Curr Res Nutr food Sci. 2021;9(1):280 – 292. doi: 10.12944/CRNFSJ.9.1.26.
Dany F, Dewi RM, Tjandrarini DH, Pradono J, Delima D, Sariadji K, et al. Urban-rural distinction of potential determinants for prediabetes in Indonesian population aged ≥ 15 years: a cross-sectional analysis of Indonesian Basic Health Research 2018 among normoglycemic and prediabetic individuals. BMC Public Health. 2020;20(1):1–9. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09592-7.
Tabák AG, Herder C, Rathmann W, Brunner EJ, Kivimäki M. Prediabetes: a high-risk state for diabetes development. Lancet. 2012;379 (9833):2279–90. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60283-9.
Alghamdi K, Khan A, Hai UA, Alghamdi S, Almalki A, Alali A, et al. Prediabets among people older than 45 in Saudi Arabia: KAP (Knowledge, Attitude and Practice). 2023. [internet]. [Cited 2024 Jan 10]. Available from: http://www.pharmacophorejournal.com/.
Muthunarayanan L, Ramraj B, Russel JK. Prevalence of prediabetes and its associated risk factors among rural adults in Tamil Nadu. Arch Med Heal Sci. 2015;3(2):178–84. doi: 10.4103/ 2321-4848.171899.
Saeed N, Jaffery T, Ansari FA, Hamid B, Khan BA. Knowledge and perceptions about pre-diabetes amongst doctors, medical students, and patients in a tertiary care hospital of Islamabad. J Pak Med Assoc. 2019;69(4):527–32.
Zhuang Q, Wu L, Ting W, Jie L, Zou J, Du J. Negative emotions in community-dwelling adults with prediabetes and hypertension. J Int Med Res. 2020;48 (4):0300060520918411. doi: 10.1177/ 030006052091.
Chen MF, Wang RH, Hung SL. Predicting health-promoting self-care behaviors in people with pre-diabetes by applying Bandura social learning theory. Appl Nurs Res. 2015;28(4): 299–304. doi: 10.1016/j.apnr.2015.01. 001.
Mohsina HK, Raja D, Jithin M, Ponnusankar S. Assessing the Knowledge, Attitude and Practice (KAP) among the newly diagnosed Prediabetes screened in selected districts of South India. Int J Res Pharm Sci. 2020;11(3):4836–46. doi: 10.26452/ijrps.v11i3.2780
Teoh KW, Ng CM, Chong CW, Bell JS, Cheong WL, Lee SWH. Knowledge, attitude, and practice toward pre-diabetes among the public, patients with pre-diabetes and healthcare professionals: a systematic review. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2023; 11(1):e003203. doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2022-003203.
AshaRani P V, Abdin E, Kumarasan R, Kumar FDS, Shafie S, Jeyagurunathan A, et al. Study protocol for a nationwide Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices (KAP) survey on diabetes in Singapore’s general population. BMJ Open. 2020;10(6):e037125. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037125.
Beiranvand S, Fayazi S, Asadizaker M. Effect of educational programs on the knowledge, attitude, and practice of foot care in patients with diabetes. Jundishapur J Chronic Dis Care. 2015;4(2):e26540. doi: 10.5812/jjcdc. 26540.
Roper KL, Thomas AR, Hieronymus L, Brock A, Keck J. Patient and clinician perceptions of prediabetes: a mixed-methods primary care study. diabetes Educ. 2019;45(3):302–14. doi: 10.1177/0145721719845.
Hyder KM, Mohan J, Varma V, Ponnusankar S, Raja D. Impact of prediabetes education program on Knowledge, attitude and practice among prediabetic population of south India. Prev Med Reports. 2021;23: 101395. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2021. 101395.
Ramachandran A, Snehalatha C, Mary S, Mukesh B, Bhaskar AD, Vijay V. The Indian Diabetes Prevention Programme shows that lifestyle modification and metformin prevent type 2 diabetes in Asian Indian subjects with impaired glucose tolerance (IDPP-1). Diabetologia. 2006;49(2):289–97. doi: 10.1007/s00125-005-0097-z.
Saleh F, Afnan F, Ara F, Mumu SJ, Khan AKA. Diabetes education, knowledge improvement, attitudes and self-care activities among patients with Type 2 Diabetes in Bangladesh. Jundishapur J Heal Sci. 2017;9(1). doi: 10.17795/jjhs-36058.
Jaiswal K, Moghe N, Mehta MC, Khaladkar K, Vaishnao L. Knowledge, attitude and practices of type II diabetes mellitus patients in a tertiary care teaching institute of central India. World J Pharm Sci. 2018;35–42.
Lai PSM. Validating instruments of measure: Is it really necessary?. Malaysian Fam physician. 2013;8(1):2-3.
Kusumo MP, Prabandari YS, Dewi FST. Measuring the Knowledge, Attitude and Practice of Patients With Diabetes Mellitus—The Design and Development Process. Community Heal Equity Res Policy. 2023;43(4): 357–65. doi: 10.1177/0272684X211 0221.
Wynd CA, Schmidt B, Schaefer MA. Two quantitative approaches for estimating content validity. West J Nurs Res. 2003;25(5):508–18. doi: 10.1177/ 0193945903252.
Zamanzadeh V, Ghahramanian A, Rassouli M, Abbaszadeh A, Alavi-Majd H, Nikanfar AR. Design and implementation content validity study: development of an instrument for measuring patient-centered communication. J caring Sci. 2015; 4(2):165. doi: 10.15171/jcs.2015.017.
Perneger T V, Courvoisier DS, Hudelson PM, Gayet-Ageron A. Sample size for pre-tests of questionnaires. Qual life Res. 2015; 24:147–51. doi: 10.1007/s11136-014-0752-2.
Soelistijo SA, Suastika K, Lindarto D, Decroli E, Permana H, Sucipto KW, Kusnadi Y, Budiman, Ikhsan MR, Sasiarini L, Sanusi H, Nugroho KH SH. Pedoman Pengelolaan dan pencegahan diabetes melitus tipe 2 dewasa di Indonesia. Jakarta: PB. Perkeni. 2021.
Kemenkes. Pedoman gizi seimbang. Kemenkes RI. Jakarta: Kemenkes RI. 2014.
Marías YF, Glasauer P. Guidelines for assessing nutrition-related knowledge, attitudes and practices. USA: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). 2014. [Internet]. [Cited 2024 Jan 13]. Available from: https://www.cabidigitallibrary.org/ doi/full/10.5555/20143306666.
Shrotryia VK, Dhanda U. Content validity of assessment instrument for employee engagement. Sage Open. 2019;9(1):2158244018821751. doi: 10.1177/2158244018821.
Cicchetti D V, Sparrow SA. Developing criteria for establishing interrater reliability of specific items: applications to assessment of adaptive behavior. Am J Ment Defic. 1981; 86(2):127–37.
Lacasse Y, Godbout C, Series F. Health-related quality of life in obstructive sleep apnoea. Eur Respir J. 2002;19(3):499–503. doi: 10.1183/ 09031936.02.00216902.
Urbina S. Essentials of psychological testing. John Wiley & Sons. 2014. [Internet]. [Cited 2024 Jan 13]. Available from: Essentials of Psychological Testing - Susana Urbina - Google Books.
Polit DF, Beck CT. Nursing research: Principles and methods. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. 2004.
Ursachi G, Horodnic IA, Zait A. How reliable are measurement scales? External factors with indirect influence on reliability estimators. Procedia Econ Financ. 2015;20:679–86. doi: 10.1016/ S2212-5671(15)00123-9.
Day S, Laver K, Jeon YH, Radford K, Low LF. Frameworks for cultural adaptation of psychosocial interventions: A systematic review with narrative synthesis. Dementia. 2023; 22(8):1921–49. doi: 10.1177/147130 2231192360.
Rubio DM, Berg-Weger M, Tebb SS, Lee ES, Rauch S. Objectifying content validity: Conducting a content validity study in social work research. Soc Work Res. 2003;27(2):94–104. doi: 10.1093/swr/27.2.94.
Newman I, Lim J, Pineda F. Content validity using a mixed methods approach: Its application and development through the use of a table of specifications methodology. J Mix Methods Res. 2013;7(3):243–60. doi: 10.1177/1558689813476922.
Brod M, Tesler LE, Christensen TL. Qualitative research and content validity: developing best practices based on science and experience. Qual life Res. 2009;18:1263–78. doi: 10.1007/s11136-009-9540-9.
Polit DF, Beck CT. The content validity index: are you sure you know what’s being reported? Critique and recommendations. Res Nurs Health. 2006;29(5):489–97. doi: 10.1002/ nur.20147.
Taherdoost H. Validity and reliability of the research instrument; how to test the validation of a questionnaire/survey in a research. How to test Valid a Quest a Res. 2016. [Internet]. [Cited 2024 Jan 10]. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/ 10.2139/ssrn.3205040.
Morgado FFR, Meireles JFF, Neves CM, Amaral A, Ferreira MEC. Scale development: ten main limitations and recommendations to improve future research practices. Psicol Reflexão e Crítica. 2017;30. doi: 10.1186/s41155-016-0057-1.
Permana H, Liem MV, Soetedjo NNM. Validation of the Indonesian Version of the Asian Diabetes Quality of Life Questionnaire. Acta Med Indones. 2021;53(2):143–8.
Sugiharto HYY, Toobert DJ, Wang ST. The validity and reliability of the summary of diabetes self-care activities questionnaire: an Indonesian version. INJEC. 2019;4(1):25–36. doi: 10.24990/injec.v4i1.229.
Tuso P. Prediabetes and lifestyle modification: time to prevent a preventable disease. Perm J. 2014; 18(3):88. doi: 10.7812/TPP/14-002.
Sakane N, Kotani K, Takahashi K, Sano Y, Tsuzaki K, Okazaki K, et al. Effects of telephone-delivered lifestyle support on the development of diabetes in participants at high risk of type 2 diabetes: J-DOIT1, a pragmatic cluster randomised trial. BMJ Open. 2015; 5(8):e007316. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007316.
Yates T, Davies M, Gorely T, Bull F, Khunti K. Effectiveness of a pragmatic education program designed to promote walking activity in individuals with impaired glucose tolerance: a randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Care. 2009;32(8):1404–10. doi: 10.2337/dc09-0130.
