The Effectiveness of the Enhanced Recovery after Cesarean Surgery (ERACS) method on patients’ pain levels and satisfaction in hospitals: a quasi-experimental posttest design 10.55131/jphd/2023/210309

Main Article Content

Fithriani Sri Utami
Elsye Maria Rosa

Abstract

Enhanced Recovery after Cesarean Surgery (ERACS) is an evidence-based, interdisciplinary method used before, during, and after surgery. The purpose of this study is to determine the effectiveness of ERACS on patients’ pain levels and satisfaction during their hospital stay. This research is expected to be a consideration for the development of hospital midwifery services in the future. This study adopted quantitative research methodology with a quasi-experimental posttest design only approach. The sampling technique used was purposive sampling. There were two types of subject criteria: the intervention group with ERACS and control groups of mothers who had conventional Cesarean sections (C-sections). A total of 140 respondents were divided into the control and experimental groups, with 70 respondents each. Pain levels were measured using the visual analog scale (VAS). Patient satisfaction data were collected using a pretested questionnaire and analyzed using IBM-SPSS version 22 statistics. There was a significant difference between pain levels at rest 24 h after C-section (p < 0.001) and at movement 24 h post-C-section (p < 0.001) in the control group compared to the experimental group. The ERACS method has been shown to be effective in reducing pain levels at rest and at movement in patients 24 h after C-section (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference between ERACS and non-ERACS patient satisfaction, but the customer satisfaction index (CSI) indicated that the patients were very satisfied. The ERACS method has been shown to be effective in reducing pain levels in C-section patients. This study also proved that the ERACS patients were very satisfied, based on the CSI results. Therefore, the ERACS method must be used and improved to enhance hospital midwifery services.

Article Details

How to Cite
1.
Sri Utami F, Maria Rosa E. The Effectiveness of the Enhanced Recovery after Cesarean Surgery (ERACS) method on patients’ pain levels and satisfaction in hospitals: a quasi-experimental posttest design: 10.55131/jphd/2023/210309. J Public Hlth Dev [Internet]. 2023 Sep. 8 [cited 2024 Nov. 21];21(3):107-19. Available from: https://he01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/AIHD-MU/article/view/263588
Section
Original Articles
Author Biographies

Fithriani Sri Utami, Magister of Hospital Administration, University of Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta

Magister of Hospital Administration, University of Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta

Elsye Maria Rosa, Magister of Nursing, University of Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta

Magister of Nursing, University of Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta

References

Tamang T, Wangchuk T, Zangmo C, Wangmo T, Tshomo K. The successful implementation of the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) program among caesarean deliveries in Bhutan to reduce the postoperative length of hospital stay. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 Dec 1;21(1).

Li MW, Kalbani S. Guideline for enhanced recovery after caesarean section. Directorate general of specialized medical care; MoH. 2022; Available from: https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-d&sxsrf=ALiCzsbKUSqW5o

Shinnick JK, Ruhotina M, Has P, Kelly BJ, Brousseau EC, O’Brien J, Peahl A. Enhanced Recovery after Surgery for Cesarean Delivery Decreases Length of Hospital Stay and Opioid Consumption: A Quality Improvement Initiative. Am J Perinatol. 2021 Aug 1;38:E215–23.

Liu ZQ, Du WJ, Yao SL. Enhanced recovery after cesarean delivery : A challenge for anesthesiologists. Chin Med J (Engl) 2020; 133(5):590-596.

Kleiman AM, Chisholm CA, Dixon AJ, Sariosek BM, Thiele RH, Hedrick TL, et al. Evaluation of the impact of enhanced recovery after surgery protocol implementation on maternal outcomes following elective cesarean delivery. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2020 Aug 1 [cited 2022 Sep 18];43:39–46. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31522935/

Tika TT, Sidharti L, Himayani R, Rahmayani F. Metode ERACS sebagai program perioperatif pasien operasi caesar. JMH. 2020;02(01):402–406.

Wilson RD. Cesarean delivery using an ERAS-CD process for nonopioid anesthesia and analgesia drug/medication management. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2022;85(B):35–52. Available from: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85136293799&doi=10.1016%2Fj.bpobgyn.2022.07.004&partnerID=40&md5=4d549385532898d08d3b67f0cf169f35

Meng X, Chen K, Yang C, Li H, Wang X. The clinical efficacy and safety of enhanced recovery after surgery for cesarean section: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and observational studies. Front Med. 2021 Aug 2 [cited 2022 Sep 18];8:694385. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34409050

Chiao SS, Razzaq KK, Sheeran JS, Forkin KT, Spangler SN, Knio ZO, et al. Effect of enhanced recovery after surgery for elective cesarean deliveries on neonatal outcomes. J Perinatol. 2022 Jan 10 [cited 2022 Sep 18]; Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35013588

Teigen NC, Sahasrabudhe N, Doulaveris G, Xie X, Negassa A, Bernstein J, Bernstein PS. Enhanced recovery after surgery at cesarean delivery to reduce postoperative length of stay: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol [Internet]. 2020;222(4):372.e1-372.e10. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2019.10.009

Klangprapan N, Narkwichean A, Luanpholcharoenchai J, Laosooksathit W. Effectiveness of the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) Protocol following elective cesarean section: A single-center randomized controlled trial. Thai J Obstet Gynaecol. 2022;30(6):393–402. Available from: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85142811341&doi=10.14456%2Ftjog.2022.46&partnerID=40&md5=6b093ed7f5efb883b8f8dcf6215393b5

Pan J, Hei Z, Li L, Zhu D, Hou H, Wu H, et al. The advantage of implementation of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in acute pain management during elective cesarean delivery: A prospective randomized controlled trial. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2020;16:369–78. Available from: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-5084999852&doi=10.2147%2FTCRM.S244039&partnerID=40&md5=8302935ef967a8a4a3a5d95aa1abb0be

Sjarifudhin M, Maria Rosa E. Effectiveness of patient centered care to reduce anxiety level and improve satisfaction in patients undergoing cataract surgery. J Medicoeticolegal dan Manaj Rumah Sakit. 2018;7(3):188–195.

Constand MK, MacDermid JC, Dal Bello-Haas V, Law M. Scoping review of patient-centered care approaches in healthcare. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14(1):271.

Kintu A, Abdulla S, Lubikire A, Nabukenya MT, Igaga E, Bulamba F, et al. Postoperative pain after cesarean section: Assessment and management in a tertiary hospital in a low-income country. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019;19(1):1–68.

Al-Hussainy RH, Fouly H, Abou Hashish EA. Gap analysis: quality and women’s satisfaction regarding postnatal care. Open Nurs J. 2022;16(1):1–9.

Hooker RS, Moloney-Johns AJ, McFarland MM. Patient satisfaction with physician assistant/associate care: An international scoping review. Hum Resour Health. 2019;17(1):104.

Martilla JA, James JC. Importance-performance analysis. Journal of Marketing. 1977;41(1):77-79

Hill Nigel BJ. How to measure customer satisfaction. 2017. 160 p. Available from: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315253107

Helia VN, Abdurrahman CP, Rahmillah FI. Analysis of customer satisfaction in hospital by using Importance-Performance Analysis (IPA) and Customer Satisfaction Index (CSI). MATEC Web Conf. 2018;154:0–4.

Kurniana AM. Analisis kepuasan pasien terhadap pelayanan rawat inap di Rumah Sakit Husada Jakarta. 2008; Available from: https://lib.ui.ac.id/detail?id=118995&lokasi=lokal