The effect of family involvement in diabetes self-management education on glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Main Article Content

Akhmad Azmiardi
Bhisma Murti
Ratih Puspita Febrinasari
Didik Gunawan Tamtomo

Abstract

Diabetes self-management education (DSME) is an essential part of diabetes care. It is possible to deliver DSME in many forms and components. In this case, family support is known to be a critical component of social support in self-care and glycemic control. This study aimed to systematically review the effectiveness of family involvement in diabetes self-management education for glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. The researchers searched PubMed, SpringerLink, Science Direct, Google Scholar, and EBSCO for English and Indonesian articles published between 2000 and 2020 describing randomized controlled trials involving family components. The primary outcome of this review was HbA1c changes. The pooled standard mean differences (SMD) or effect size between intervention and control groups with 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated using a random-effects model. Meanwhile, heterogeneity of HbA1c findings was assessed with Cochran’s Q and I2. Seventeen randomized controlled trials with a total of 2644 participants were obtained from a comprehensive search procedure. The intervention was effective in reducing HbA1c (SMD= -0.31 95%CI= -0.46 to -0.16;) than the control group, and it was statistically significant (p<.001). Due to heterogeneity (I2 = 71%), a meta-analysis of the random-effects model was employed. Intervention program with baseline HbA1c < 9% (SMD= -0.55; 95%CI= -1.05 to -0.05; p=.030), duration of intervention ≥ 6 month (SMD= -0.26; 95%CI= -0.37 to -0.15; p<.001), intervention delivery mode of combination type (SMD= -0.73; 95%CI= -1.42 to -0.03; p=.040), contact hour ≥10 (SMD= -0.37; 95%CI= -0.59 to -0.14; p=.001), and frequency of contact (SMD= -0.75; 95%CI= -1.39 to -0.12; p=.020) were effective to reduce HbA1c level. According to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) method, the quality of evidence was classified as moderate. Family involvement in the DSME program was effective in improving glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes. Further research on baseline HbA1c, delivery mode, contact hours, and intervention frequency may provide useful information to determine the most effective treatment.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section
Review articles
Author Biographies

Akhmad Azmiardi, Doctoral Program of Public Health, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta, Indonesia

Doctoral Program of Public Health, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta, Indonesia

Bhisma Murti, Doctor of Public Health Program, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta, Indonesia

Doctor of Public Health Program, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta, Indonesia

Ratih Puspita Febrinasari, Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta, Indonesia

Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta, Indonesia

Didik Gunawan Tamtomo, Doctor of Public Health Program, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta, Indonesia

Doctor of Public Health Program, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta, Indonesia

References

1. Onyango EM, Onyango BM. The rise of noncommunicable diseases in Kenya: An examination of the time trends and contribution of the changes in diet and physical inactivity. J Epidemiol Glob Health [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2021 January 29];8(1–2):1–7. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi. nlm.nih.gov/30859780/
2. Peros JP. Diabetes self-management education (DSME) program for glycemic control. University of San Diego; 2016.
3. Khan MAB, Hashim MJ, King JK, Govender RD, Mustafa H, Kaabi J Al. Epidemiology of Type 2 diabetes - Global burden of disease and forecasted trends. J Epidemiol Glob Health [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2021 January 29];10(1):107–11. Available from: /pmc/articles/PMC7310804/?report=abstract
4. Cho NH, Shaw JE, Karuranga S, Huang Y, da Rocha Fernandes JD, Ohlrogge AW, et al. IDF Diabetes Atlas: Global estimates of diabetes prevalence for 2017 and projections for 2045. Diabetes Res Clin Pract [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2021 January 29];138:271–81. Available from: https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.diabres.2018.02.023
5. Baena-Díez JM, Peñafiel J, Subirana I, Ramos R, Elosua R, Marín-Ibañez A, et al. Risk of cause-specific death in individuals with diabetes: A competing risks analysis. Diabetes Care [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2021 January 29];39(11): 1987–95. Available from: http://www. diabetesjournals
6. American Diabetes Association. Standard medical care in diabetes 2018. J Clin Appl Res Educ 2018.
7. Chatterjee S, Davies MJ, Heller S, Speight J, Snoek FJ, Khunti K. Diabetes structured self-management education programmes: a narrative review and current innovations. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2017;6(2):130–42.
8. Haas L, Maryniuk M, Beck J, Cox CE, Duker P, Edwards L, et al. National standards for diabetes self-management education and support. Diabetes Educ. 2014;38:5.
9. Beck J, Greenwood DA, Blanton L, Bollinger ST, Butcher MK, Condon JE, et al. 2017 National Standards for Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support. Diabetes Care. 2017; 40(10):1409–19.
10. Armstrong C. ADA Updates Standards of Medical Care for Patients with Diabetes Mellitus [Internet]. American Family Physician 2017 [cited 2021 January 27]. Available from: www.aafp.org/afp/
11. Chai S, Yao B, Xu L, Wang D, Sun J, Yuan N, et al. The effect of diabetes self-management education on psychological status and blood glucose in newly diagnosed patients with diabetes type 2. Patient Educ Couns [Internet]. 2018;101(8):1427–32. Available from: https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.pec.2018.03.020
12. Adam L, O’Connor C, Garcia AC. Evaluating the Impact of Diabetes Self-Management Education Methods on Knowledge, Attitudes and Behaviours of Adult Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus [Internet]. Can J Diabetes. 2018 [cited 2020 October 14];42(5):470-477.e2. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjd.2017.11.003
13. Abdulah DM, Hassan AB, Saadi FS, Mohammed AH. Impacts of self-management education on glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus [Internet]. Diabetes Metab Syndr Clin Res Rev. 2018;12(6):969–75. Available from: http://www. sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1871402118302145
14. Orbell S, Schneider H, Esbitt S, Gonzalez JS, Gonzalez JS, Shreck E, et al. Hemoglobin A1c. In: Encyclopedia of Behavioral Medicine [Internet]. Springer New York; 2013 [cited 2021 January 29]. p. 957–957. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ books/NBK549816/
15. Mohebi S, Rad G, Bakht L, Feizi A. Importance of social support in diabetes care. J Educ Health Promot [Internet]. 2013 [cited 2021 Jan 29];2(1):62. Available from: /pmc/articles/ PMC3908488/?report=abstract
16. Mayberry LS, Osborn CY. Family support, medication adherence, and glycemic control among adults with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care [Internet]. 2012 Jun [cited 2021 Feb 3];35(6):1239–45. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22538012/
17. Pamungkas RA, Chamroonsawasdi K, Vatanasomboon P. A systematic review: Family support integrated with diabetes self-management among uncontrolled type II diabetes mellitus patients [Internet]. Behav Sci (Basel); 2017 [cited 2020 Oct 14];7(3):1–17. Available from: www.mdpi.com/ journal/behavsci
18. Moher D. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. Ann Intern Med [Internet]. 2009 [cited 2020 December 7];151(4):264. Available from: http://annals.org/ article.aspx?doi=10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135
19. Higgins JPT, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC, Jüni P, Moher D, Oxman AD, et al. The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials [Internet]. BMJ; 2011 [cited 2020 December 7];343(7829). Available from: http://www.bmj.com/content/ 343/bmj.d5928/suppl/DC1
20. Powers MA, Bardsley J, Cypress M, Duker P, Funnell MM, Fischl AH, et al. Diabetes self-management education and support in type 2 diabetes: A joint position statement of the American Diabetes Association, the American Association of Diabetes Educators, and the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics [Internet]. Diabetes Care; 2015 [cited 2020 Dec 7];38(7):1372–82. Available from: http://www.diabeteseducator. org/

21. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE, Kunz R, Falck-Ytter Y, Alonso-Coello P, et al. GRADE: An emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations [Internet]. BMJ; 2008 [cited 2020 December 7]; 336(7650):924–6. Available from: https://www.bmj.com/content/336/7650/924
22. Godavitarne C, Robertson A, Ricketts DM, Rogers BA. Understanding and interpreting funnel plots for the clinician [Internet]. Br J Hosp Med; 2018 [cited 2020 December 19];79(10):578–83. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30290744/
23. Begg CB, Mazumdar M. Operating Characteristics of a Rank Correlation Test for Publication Bias. Biometrics. 1994;50(4):1088.
24. Egger M, Smith GD, Schneider M, Minder C. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test [Internet]. Br Med J; 1997 [cited 2021 March 18];315(7109):629–34. Available from: https://www.bmj.com/ content/315/7109/629
25. Higgins JPT, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses [Internet]. Vol. 327, British Medical Journal. BMJ Publishing Group; 2003 [cited 2020 December 7]. p. 557–60. Available from: /pmc/articles/PMC192859/? report=abstract
26. Riley RD, Higgins JPT, Deeks JJ. Interpretation of random effects meta-analyses [Internet]. BMJ. 2011 [cited 2020 December 7];342(7804):964–7. Available from: https://www.bmj.com/ content/342/bmj.d549
27. Lewis S, Clarke M. Forest plots: Trying to see the wood and the trees [Internet]. Vol. 322, British Medical Journal: BMJ Publishing Group; 2001 [cited 2020 December 7]p. 1479–80. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ pmc/articles/PMC1120528/
28. Brown SA, Garcia AA, Kouzekanani K, Hanis CL. Culturally competent diabetes self-management education for Mexican Americans: The Starr County border health initiative. Diabetes Care. 2002;25(2):259–68.
29. Vincent D, Pasvogel A, Barrera L. A feasibility study of a culturally tailored diabetes intervention for mexican americans. Biol Res Nurs. 2007;9(2):130–41.
30. Rosal MC, Ockene IS, Restrepo A, White MJ, Borg A, Olendzki B, et al. Randomized trial of a literacy-sensitive, culturally tailored diabetes self-management intervention for low-income Latinos: Latinos en control. Diabetes Care. 2011;34(4):838–44.
31. Toobert DJ, Strycker LA, Barrera M, Osuna D, King DK, Glasgow RE. Outcomes from a multiple risk factor diabetes self-management trial for latinas: ¡viva Bien! Ann Behav Med. 2011;41(3):310–23.
32. Castejón AM, Calderón JL, Perez A, Millar C, McLaughlin-Middlekauf J, Sangasubana N, et al. A community - Based pilot study of a diabetes pharmacist intervention in latinos: Impact on weight and hemoglobin A1c. J Health Care Poor Underserved 2013;24(4 SUPPL.):48–60.
33. García AA, Brown SA, Horner SD, Zuñiga J, Arheart KL. Home-based diabetes symptom self-management education for Mexican Americans with type 2 diabetes. Health Educ Res. 2014;30(3):484–96.
34. Trief PM, Fisher L, Sandberg J, Cibula DA, Dimmock J, Hessler DM, et al. Health and psychosocial outcomes of a telephonic couples behavior change intervention in patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes: A randomized clinical trial. Diabetes Care [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2020 October 14];39(12):2165–73. Available from: http://care.diabetesjournals.org/lookup/doi/10.2337/dc16-0035
35. Ing CT, Zhang G, Dillard A, Yoshimura SR, Hughes C, Palakiko D-MM, et al. Social Support Groups in the Maintenance of Glycemic Control after Community-Based Intervention. J Diabetes Res [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2020 October 14];2016:1–8. Available from: http://www.hindawi.com/ journals/jdr/2016/7913258/
36. McEwen MM, Pasvogel A, Murdaugh C, Hepworth J. Effects of a Family-based Diabetes Intervention on Behavioral and Biological Outcomes for Mexican American Adults. Diabetes Educ [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2020 October 14];43(3):272–85. Available from: http://journals. sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0145721717706031
37. McElfish PA, Long CR, Kohler PO, Yeary KHK, Bursac Z, Narcisse MR, et al. Comparative effectiveness and maintenance of diabetes self-management education interventions for Marshallese patients with type 2 diabetes: A randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Care. 2019;1:42(5):849–58.
38. Shakibazadeh E, … LB-H promotion, 2015 undefined. Persian diabetes self-management education (PDSME) program: evaluation of effectiveness in Iran. academic.oup.com [Internet]. [cited 2020 Oct 14]. Available from: https://academic.oup.com/heapro/article-abstract/31/3/623/1749576
39. Tabasi HK, Madarshahian F, Nikoo MK, Hassanabadi M, Mahmoudirad G. Impact of family support improvement behaviors on anti diabetic medication adherence and cognition in type 2 diabetic patients. J Diabetes Metab Disord 2014;13(1):1–6.
40. Wichit N, Mnatzaganian G, Courtney M, Schulz P, Johnson M. Randomized controlled trial of a family-oriented self-management program to improve self-efficacy, glycemic control and quality of life among Thai individuals with Type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Res Clin Pract [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2020 October 14];123:37–48. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ j.diabres.2016.11.013
41. Withidpanyawong U, Lerkiatbundit S, Saengcharoen W. Family-based intervention by pharmacists for type 2 diabetes: A randomised controlled trial. Patient Educ Couns [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2020 October 14];102(1):85–92. Available from: https://linkinghub. elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0738399118305354
42. Keogh KM, Smith SM, White P, McGilloway S, Kelly A, Gibney J, et al. Psychological family intervention for poorly controlled type 2 diabetes. Am J Manag Care. 2011;17(2):105–13.
43. Kang CM, Chang SC, Chen PL, Liu PF, Liu WC, Chang CC, et al. Comparison of family partnership intervention care vs. conventional care in adult patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes in a community hospital: A randomized controlled trial. Int J Nurs Stud [Internet]. 2010;47(11):1363–73. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2010.03.009
44. Gomes LC, Coelho ACM, Gomides D dos S, Foss-Freitas MC, Foss MC, Pace AE. Contribution of family social support to the metabolic control of people with diabetes mellitus: A randomized controlled clinical trial. Appl Nurs Res. 2017;1:36:68–76.
45. Trief PM, Fisher L, Sandberg J, Hessler DM, Cibula DA, Weinstock RS. Two for one? Effects of a couples intervention on partners of persons with Type 2 diabetes: a randomized controlled trial. Diabet Med [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2020 October 14]; 36(4):473–81. Available from: http:// doi.wiley.com/10.1111/dme.13871
46. Azami G, Soh KL, Sazlina S-G, Salmiah MS, Aazami S. Behavioral interventions to improve self-management in Iranian adults with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Diabetes Metab Disord [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2020 October 14];17(2):365–80. Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40200-018-0376-0
47. Ramírez-Mendoza F, González JE, Gasca E, Camacho M, Cruz M V., Caraveo D, et al. Time in range and HbA1C after 6 months with a multidisciplinary program for children and adolescents with diabetes mellitus, real world data from Mexico City. Pediatr Diabetes [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2020 December 19];21(1):61–8. Available from: /pmc/articles/ PMC6973224/?report=abstract
48. Steinsbekk A, Rygg L, Lisulo M, Rise MB, Fretheim A. Group based diabetes self-management education compared to routine treatment for people with type 2 diabetes mellitus. A systematic review with meta-analysis. Vol. 12, BMC Health Services Research. 2012.
49. Stratton IM, Adler AI, Neil HAW, Matthews DR, Manley SE, Cull CA, et al. Association of glycaemia with macrovascular and microvascular complications of type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 35): Prospective observational study. Br Med J [Internet]. 2000 [cited 2021 March 23];321(7258):405–12. Available from: /pmc/articles/PMC27454/
50. Ikeda M, Shimazawa R. Challenges to hemoglobin A1c as a therapeutic target for type 2 diabetes mellitus [Internet]. Vol. 20, Journal of General and Family Medicine. Wiley-Blackwell; 2019 [cited 2021 Febuary 1]. p.129–38. Available from: /pmc/articles/ PMC6612881/?report=abstract
51. Lage MJ, Boye KS. The relationship between HbA1c reduction and healthcare costs among patients with type 2 diabetes: evidence from a U.S. claims database. Curr Med Res Opin [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2021 February 1];36(9):1–7. Available from: https:// pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32643451/
52. Wilding J, Godec T, Khunti K, Pocock S, Fox R, Smeeth L, et al. Changes in HbA1c and weight, and treatment persistence, over the 18 months following initiation of second-line therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes: results from the United Kingdom Clinical Practice Research Datalink. BMC Med [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2021 February 1];16(1):116. Available from: https://bmcmedicine.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12916-018-1085-8
53. Gary TL, Genkinger JM, Guallar E, Peyrot M, FL. B. Meta-analysis of randomized educational and behavioral interventions in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Educ. 2003;29:3.
54. Riddle MC, Vlajnic A, Zhou R, Rosenstock J. Baseline HbA1c predicts attainment of 7.0% HbA1c target with structured titration of insulin glargine in type 2 diabetes: A patient-level analysis of 12 studies. Diabetes, Obes Metab [Internet]. 2013 [cited 2021 February 1];15(9):819–25. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23489438/
55. Association AD. Standards of medical care in diabetes - 2013 [Internet]. Vol. 36, Diabetes Care. American Diabetes Association; 2013 [cited 2021 February 2]p.S11. Available from: https://www. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3537269/
56. Carpenter R, DiChiacchio T, Barker K. Interventions for self-management of type 2 diabetes: An integrative review [Internet]. Vol. 6, International Journal of Nursing Sciences. Chinese Nursing Association; 2019 [cited 2021 February 1]p.70–91. Available from: /pmc/ articles/PMC6608673/?report=abstract
57. Chrvala CA, Sherr D, Lipman RD. Diabetes self-management education for adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A systematic review of the effect on glycemic control. Patient Educ Couns. 2016;1:99(6):926–43.
58. He X, Li J, Wang B, Yao Q, Li L, Song R, et al. Diabetes self-management education reduces risk of all-cause mortality in type 2 diabetes patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Endocrine [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2020 October 14];55(3):712–31. Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/ s12020-016-1168-2
59. Cunningham AT, Crittendon DR, White N, Mills GD, Diaz V, Lanoue MD. The effect of diabetes self-management education on HbA1c and quality of life in African-Americans: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18(1).
60. Qi L, Liu Q, Qi X, Wu N, Tang W, Xiong H. Effectiveness of peer support for improving glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMC Public Health. 2015;15(1).
61. Winkley K, Upsher R, Stahl D, Pollard D, Kasera A, Brennan A, et al. Psychological interventions to improve self-management of type 1 and type 2 diabetes: A systematic review. Health Technol Assess (Rockv) [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2021 March 21];24(28):1–268. Available from: https://www. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK558398/