Development of learning networks to combat domestic violence in Bangkok, Thailand

Main Article Content

Napatsorn Semson
Kriengsak Chareonwongsak
Ratchanont Supapongpichate

Abstract

This research studied the use of learning networks in Bangkok communities as a way to combat domestic violence associated with political conflict. Thailand has suffered increased political and domestic violence since 1999, although a direct link between the two has not yet been established. The objective of this study was to examine the association between domestic and political violence in communities in and around Bangkok, using a medico-legal perspective in order to develop a policy to mitigate the effects of violence.  The study used a participatory community action research approach with a quantitative-led mixed-methods design to collect data from members of local communities in Bangkok who have been affected by both political and domestic violence, through surveys and focus groups.  The findings examined the awareness of domestic violence and its effects and impact on political violence. The research showed a moderate level of impact on economic, physical and mental well-being in areas affected by political violence. It also revealed a low to moderate awareness of domestic violence and its effects. Focus groups identified learning networks as a possible model for mitigating the impact of domestic violence on the physical and mental well-being, and harmony of communities. The implications and approach for establishing a learning network in a healthy community to address domestic violence were also discussed.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section
Original Articles
Author Biographies

Napatsorn Semson, Environmental Education Programme, Faculty of Social and Humanities Sciences, Mahidol University, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand

Environmental Education Programme, Faculty of Social and Humanities Sciences, Mahidol University, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand

Kriengsak Chareonwongsak, Intuition of Future Studies for Development, Thailand

Intuition of Future Studies for Development, Thailand

Ratchanont Supapongpichate, Environmental Education Programme, Faculty of Social and Humanities Sciences, Mahidol University, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand

Environmental Education Programme, Faculty of Social and Humanities Sciences, Mahidol University, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand

References

World Health Organization. World report on violence and health [Internet]. [Cited 2019 March 16]. Available from: http://www.who.int/
violence_injury_prevention/violence/world report/en/
2. Areeya, K. Violence in Thailand [Internet]. 2011 [Cited 2018 April 6]. Available from: http://www.peace.
mahidol.ac.th/th/document/learn/PBPS101/120421society.ppt
3. Office of Women's Affairs and Family. Knowledge about violence [Internet]. [Cited 2018 April 6]. Available from: http://www.violence.in.th/publicweb/Know.aspx
4. Somchai, J. The violence in society: How will our children survive?. Hygienic Doctor Journal 2000;12:75-7.
5. Gunaratna, R., Acharya, A., and Chua, M. Conflict and terrorism in Southern Thailand. Singapore: Marshall Cavendish Academic. 2005.
6. Sidel, J.T. The Islamist threat in Southeast Asia: A reassessment. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies. 2007.
7. Bell, C. and Sudduth, J.K. The causes and outcomes of coup during civil war. J Conflict Resolut. 2017;61(7): 1432-55.
8. Spripokanggul, S. Inferior to non-humans, lower than animals and worse than demons: The demonization of red shirts in Thailand. Asian Soc Sci. 2015;11(24): 331-42.
9. Wisuthatham, S. Explore "Lang WatPutham Community": Unseen impact behind the curtain of political war [Internet]. [Cited 2019 March 16]. Available from: http://www.matichon.
co.th/newsdetail.php?newsid=1305868751&grpid =01&catid=no
10. Uwanno, B. Conflicts in Thailand, causes, impacts and solutions: Passing through the dead end of crisis in Thailand [Internet]. [Cited 2019 March 14]. Available from: http://www.idis.
ru.ac.th/report/index.php?topic=16070
11. Jittasathien, S. Model of conflict management in provincial public health organizations: Case study in Phitsanulok public health organizations. Khon Khaen University Dental Journal 2007;10(1):297-311.
12. Data Centre on Violence Against Children, Women and Domestic Violence. Statistics and figures on domestic violence incidents [Internet]. [Cited 2019 March 16]. Available from: http://www.violence.in.th/violence/
report/violence/main.aspx?lid=24&accordion=1&violince_id=
13. Department of Strategy and Evaluation, Bangkok Metropolitan Administration. 12-year Bangkok development plan B.E. 2552-2563 [Internet]. [Cited 2019 March 17]. Available from: http://office.bangkok.
go.th/pipd/02_Plan% 20BMA
14. National Collaborating Centre for Nursing and Supportive Care. Violence: The short-term management of disturbed/violent behaviour in in-patient psychiatric settings and emergency departments [Internet]. [Cited 2019 March 19]. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/
pubmed/21834187
15. Supatra, J. Solutions for Thai political violence problem [Internet]. [Cited 2019 March 26]. Available from: http://www.kpi.ac.th/kpith/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=2305&Itemid=142
16. Semson, N. Development of learning networks regarding the impact of community violence to combat such and thus create a liveable city in the Bangkok Metropolitan Area. Environmental Education. Bangkok: Mahidol University 2012.
17. Flood, M. and Pease, B. Factors influencing attitudes to violence against women. Trauma, Violence and Abuse. 2009;10(2):125-42.
18. Wolfe, D.A. Preventing violence in relationships: Psychological science addressing complex social issues. Can. Psychol. 2006;47(1):44-50.
19. Miller, K.E. and Rasmussen, A. War exposure, daily stressors, and mental health in conflict and post-conflict settings: Bridging the divide between trauma-focused and psychosocial frameworks. Soc Sci Med 2010);70(1): 7-16.
20. Øverlien, C. Children exposed to domestic violence: Conclusions from the literature and challenges ahead. Soc Work 2010;10(1):80-97.
21. Shipway, L. Domestic violence: A handbook for health professionals. New York: Routledge 2004.
22. Jackson, J., Huq, A.Z., Bradford, B. and Tyler, T. R. Monopolizing force? Police legitimacy and public attitudes to the acceptability of violence. Psychol Public Policy Law. 2013;19(4): 479-97.
23. Miguel, E., Saiegh, S.M. and Satyanath, S. Civil war exposure and violence. Econ Politic. 2011;23(1): 59-73.
24. Al-Krenawi A, Graham J.R. and Sehwail M.A. Tomorrow's players under occupation: An analysis of the association of political violence with psychological functioning and domestic violence among Palestinian youth. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry 2007;77(3): 427-33.
25. Clark, C.J., Everson-Rose, S.A., Suglia S.F., Btoush, R. Alonso, A. and Haj-Yahia M.M. Association between exposure to political violence and intimate-partner violence in the occupied Palestinian territory: a cross-sectional study. The Lancet 2010;375(9711):310-16.
26. Victoroff, J., Adelman, J.R. and Matthews M. Psychological factors associated with support for suicide bombing in the Muslim diaspora. Polit Psychol. 2012;33(6): 791-809.
27. Bhuyan, R., Mell, M., Senturia, K., Sullivan, M. and Shiu-Thornton, S. Women must endure according to their karma": Cambodian immigrant women talk about domestic violence. J Interpers. Violence. 2005;20(8):
902-21.
28. Faramarzi, M., Esmailzadeh, S. and Mosavi, S.A. Comparison of abused and non-abused women's definitions of domestic violence and attitudes to acceptance of male dominance. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2005;122(2): 225-31.
29. Rainers, K., Guo X., Li, M., Xie, B. and
Zhang, T. Innovating in a learning community: Emergence of an open information infrastructure in China's pharmaceutical distribution industry. New York: Springer 2014.
30. Galinsky, E. Learning communities: An emerging phenomenon. Young Children 2012;67(1):26-7.
31. Kelly, P.J. Practical suggestions for community interventions using participatory action research. Public Health Nurs. 2005:22(1): 65-73.
32. Sabah, Y. and Cook-Craig, P. Learning teams and virtual communities of practice: Managing evidence and expertise beyond the stable state. Res Soc Work Pract. 2010:20(4): 433-46.
33. Raeburn, J., Akerman, M., Mejia, F., Chuengsatiansup, K. and Oladepo, O. Community capacity building and health promotion in a globalized world. Health Promot Int. 2006;21(1): 84-90.
34. Tanvatanakul, V., Vicente, C., Amado, J. and Saowakontha, S. Strengthening health development at the community level in Thailand: What events should be managed?. World health Popul 2007;9(1) :65-73.
35. Yamnill, S., and McLean, M.N. Knowledge management in a community setting using action research: a case study of Lumpaya community, Nakorn Pathom Province, Thailand. Hum Resour Dev Int. 2010;
13(5): 541-56.
36. Post, L.A., Kievens, J., Maxwell, C.D., Shelley, G.A. and Ingram, E. An examination of whether coordinated community responses affect intimate partner violence. J Interpers Violence
2010;25(1): 75-93.
37. Dahlberg, L.L. and Butchart, A. State of the science: Violence prevention efforts in developing and developed countries. Int J Inj Contr Saf Promot. 2005;12(2): 93-104.
38. Esser, D.E. Metropolitan growth and security in Asia-Pacific: Correcting the dislocation of public policy [Internet]. [Cited 2019 March 14]. Available from: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/pa
pers.cfm?abstract_id=1450122
39. Willman, A. and Makisaka, M. Interpersonal violence prevention: A review of the evidence and emerging lessons [Internet]. [Cited 2019 March 14]. Available from: HTTPs:// openknowledge.worldbank.com/ bitstream/handle/10986/9142/WDR2011_0013.pdf?sequence=1
40. McIntyre, A. Participatory action research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications 2007.
41. Wasi, P. In a non-violent approach to human rights. Bangkok: National Human Rights Commission 2002.