Using the social innovation perspective to explain the emergence and consequences of a cross-border health services system for the Thai-Cambodia border

Main Article Content

Kessarawadee Khonhan
Nawarat Phlainoi
Luechai Sri-Ngernyuang
Patamawadee Pochanukul

Abstract

Social innovation is crucial for ensuring access to health services and improving the quality of life for people in the border areas, especially migrant groups. However, social innovation is challenging in the context of unfavourable environments and resource constraints. The purpose of this paper was to examine the emergence, factors, and consequences of social innovation in a cross-border health service system for access to health services at the Thai-Cambodian border, Klong Yai - Koh Kong, using a case study format. The data were collected from documents and key informants using in-depth interviews, focus group discussions, and participatory observations. Based on the content analysis, it was found that social innovation arose from problems and crises, while being driven by the cooperation of stakeholders in the border areas. Key factors, including social capital, relational capital, and human capital existed in the area. Furthermore, the shift in perspectives on issues, out-of-the-box thinking, good leadership, trust, transnational cooperation networks, and results-oriented work has resulted in greater access to health services for migrant populations. Therefore, it is recommended to promote border areas with rich social capital, human capital, and good cross-border relations in order to generate and foster social innovation, as well as to establish local learning mechanisms to improve and adapt social innovation for changes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section
Original Articles
Author Biographies

Kessarawadee Khonhan, Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, Mahidol University, Nakorn Pathom, Thailand

Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, Mahidol University, Nakorn Pathom, Thailand

Nawarat Phlainoi, Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, Mahidol University, Nakorn Pathom, Thailand

Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, Mahidol University, Nakorn Pathom, Thailand

Luechai Sri-Ngernyuang, Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, Mahidol University, Nakorn Pathom, Thailand

Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, Mahidol University, Nakorn Pathom, Thailand

Patamawadee Pochanukul, Thailand Science Research and Innovation, Bangkok, Thailand

Thailand Science Research and Innovation, Bangkok, Thailand

References

1. Kamel WW. Health in border areas. Global Perspective in Health 2009;2.
2. Chantavanich S. Health Bordr in the GMS Challenges for border health, need for multi-section and cross country action. Bankkok, Thailand: Bi-regional Meeting on Healthy Borders in Greater Mekong Sub-region, 5-7 August 2013 [Internet]. 2013[Cited 2014 April 4]. Available from: http://www.searo. who.int/thailand/news/key_note_dr_supang_ch.pdf?ua=1.
3. Langellier BA, Martínez-Donate AP, Gonzalez-Fagoaga JE, Rangel MG. The Relationship Between Educational Attainment and Health Care Access and Use Among Mexicans, Mexican Americans, and U.S.–Mexico Migrants. J Immigr Minor Health J, 2019.
4. Lebnark S. Mor Tui of Um Phaang Dedicating Life for The Poor [Internet]. 2012 [Cited 2012 Febuary 24]. Available from: http://www.hfocus.org.
5. Jindathong J. A Case of Access the Health Service, Umphaang Hospital, Tak province. In Naowarat Plaainoy,editor. Mangaement for Elevation of Life Quality of Population with problem on Person Status. Bangkok: P.A. Living 2011.
6. Wohler Y, Dantas JA. Barriers Accessing Mental Health Services Among Culturally and Linguistically Diverse (CALD) Immigrant Women in Australia: Policy Implications. J Immigr Minor Health J. 2017;19(3): 697-701.
7. Ivey SL, Kim H, Yoo E, Hwang N, Cha DD, Lee J, et al. Health and Healthcare Needs of Koreans in San Francisco Bay Area: The Korean Needs Assessment (KoNA) Project. J Immigr Minor Health J. 2019;21(5): 1043-51.
8. González Block MA, Vargas Bustamante A, De La Sierra LA, Martínez Cardoso A. Redressing the limitations of the affordable care act for Mexican immigrants through bi-national health insurance: A willingness to pay study in Los Angeles. J Immigr Minor Health. 2014;16(2): 179-88.
9. Inkochasan M, Gopinath D, Vicario E, Lee A, Duigan P. Access to health care for migrants in the Greater Mekong Subregion: policies and legal frameworks and their impact on malaria control in the context of malaria elimination. WHO South-East Asia J public health. 2019;8(1): 26-34.
10. United States-México Border Health Commission. Access to Health Care in the U.S.-México Border Region: Challenges and Opportunities. A White Paper. November [Internet]. [Cited 2015 January 20]. Available from: www.borderhealth.org/files/res_2756.pdf.
11. Thai Health Insurance Research Office. The study of the situation of health services for Cambodians on the Thai-Cambodian border. : A case study of Sa Kaew Province, Chanthaburi Province, and Trat Province. International Public Health Office, Ministry of Public Health 2013.
12. Linn ZM, Sariyamon T, Nate H. Factors affecting the utilization of quality antenatal care services among Myanmar migrants in Thai health care facilities: Tak and Samut Sakhon Province. Journal of Public Health and Development 2016;14(3):45-54.
13. Loganathan T, Rui D, Pocock NS. Healthcare for migrant workers in destination countries: a comparative qualitative study of China and Malaysia. BMJ Open 2020;10(12): e039800.
14. Dawson P, Daniel L. Understanding social innovation: a provisional framework. International Journal of Technology Management 2010;51(1): 9-21.
15. European Commission. Guide to social innovation 2013 [Internet]. 2013 [Cited 2014 October 20]. Available from: http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docgener/presenta/social_innovation/social_innovation_2013.pdf.
16. Minks M. Social innovation: New solutions to social problems [M.A.L.S.]. Ann Arbor: Georgetown University 2011.
17. Mulgan G, Tucker S, Ali R, Sanders B. Social innovation: what it is, why it matters and how it can be accelerated. London: The Young Foundation 2007.
18. Kanjanajitra C, Im-aem W. Social Innovation. Meaning Provision and Activity Characteristics in Thailand. Workshop on Supporting Guideline for Social Innovation. Rama Garden Hotel, Office Of Thailand Research Fund 2002.
19. Cajaiba-Santana G. Social innovation: Moving the field forward. A conceptual framework. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 2014;82:42-51.
20. Grimm R, Fox C, Baines S, Albertson K. Social innovation, an answer to contemporary societal challenges? Locating the concept in theory and practice. Innovation: Eur. J. Soc. Sci. 2013;26(4): 436-55.
21. Moulaert F, Hillier J, Vicari S. Social innovation and territorial development. Farnham: Ashgate 2009.
22. Nandan M. Social Innovation. Encyclopedia of Human Services and Diversity. SAGE Publications, Inc. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc 2014 1212-3.
23. Paunescu C. Current trends in social innovation research: social capital, corporate social responsibility, impact measurement. Management & Marketing 2014;9(2):105-18.
24. Manzini E. Making things happen: Social innovation and design. Des Issues. 2014;30(1):57-66.
25. Bessant J, Rush H, Trifilova A. ‘Jumping the tracks’: Crisis-driven social innovation and the development of novel trajectories. Die Unternehmung 2012;66(3):221-42.
26. Bino S, Cavaljuga S, Kunchev A, Lausevic D, Kaic B, Pistol A, et al. Southeastern European Health Network (SEEHN) communicable diseases surveillance: a decade of bridging trust and collaboration. Emerg Health Threats J. 2013;6.
27. Vargas BA, Laugesen M, Caban M, Rosenau P. United States-Mexico cross-border health insurance initiatives: Salud Migrante and Medicare in Mexico. Rev. Panam. Salud Publica. 2012;31(1): 74-80.
28. Jiménez-Jiménez D, Sanz-Valle R. Innovation, organizational learning, and performance. J Bus Res. 2011;64(4): 408-17.
29. Everett M. Rogers. Diffusion of innovations Fifth Edition. Edition F, editor. New York: Simon & Schuster 2003.
30. Hataley T, Leuprecht C. Determinants of Cross-Border Cooperation. J Borderl. Stud 2018;33(3): 317-28.
31. Pikner T. Reorganizing Cross-Border Governance Capacity: The Case of the Helsinki—Tallinn Euregio. Eur Urban Reg Stud. 2008;15(3): 211-27.
32. Nelles J, Durand F. Political rescaling and metropolitan governance in cross-border regions: comparing the cross-border metropolitan areas of Lille and Luxembourg. Eu Urban Reg Stud. 2014;21(1): 104-22.
33. Langellier BA, Guernsey de Zapien J, Rosales C, Ingram M, Carvajal SC. State Medicaid Expansion, Community Interventions, and Health Care Disparities in a United States–Mexico Border Community. Am. J Public Health. 2014;104(8): e94-e100.
34. Srisom A. Thai People in Koh Kong: Public Relations Department [Internet]. [Cited 2017 April 24]. Available from: http://www.aseanthai.net/ewt_news.php?nid=2454&filename=index.
35. Mulgan G. The process of social innovation. innovations 2006;1(2):145-62.
36. Lettice F, Parekh M. The social innovation process: themes, challenges and implications for practice. Int J Technol Manag . 2010;51(1): 139-58.
37. Markus P. Cross-border regions in Europe significance and drivers of regional cross-border co-operation. Definite version appeared in u Urban Reg Stud. 2013; 10(2): 153–171.
38. Yip GS, McKern B. China's next strategic advantage: From imitation to innovation. MIT Press 2016.
39. Kim L, Nelson RR, Nelson RR. Technology, learning, and innovation: Experiences of newly industrializing economies. Cambridge University Press 2000.
40. Reininger BM, Barroso CS, Mitchell-Bennett L, Chavez M, Fernandez ME, Cantu E, et al. Socio-ecological Influences on Health-Care Access and Navigation Among Persons of Mexican Descent Living on the U.S./Mexico Border. J Immigr Minor Health. 2014;16(2): 218-28.
41. Glinos IA, Baeten R, Helble M, Maarse H. A typology of cross-border patient mobility. Health Place. 2010;16(6): 1145-55.
42. Liverani M, Ir P, Jacobs B, Asante A, Jan S, Leang S, et al. Cross-border medical travels from Cambodia: pathways to care, associated costs and equity implications. Health Policy Plan 2020;35(8): 1011-20.