Preference for home births in rural Bangladesh: A qualitative exploratory study
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Despite the renewed commitment to increase the rate of health facility-based delivery, more than half of all deliveries still take place at home in rural Bangladesh with the support of traditional birth attendants (TBAs), which leads to high maternal mortality as well as poor maternal health and pregnancy outcomes. The aim of this study was to identify the reasons for preferring home delivery among rural communities in Bangladesh. The data were gathered through three Focus Group Discussions (FGDs) among three different groups of stakeholders, viz., nine women, seven men, and nine health service providers. Thus, 25 individuals participated in this study. FGDs were conducted in a rural sub-district of Bangladesh. Thematic analysis was performed. The findings revealed a high preference for home delivery attended by TBAs among rural communities, as it was convenient, easily affordable, comfortable, and suitable for maintaining social rituals during labor and after delivery. Cultural practices and belief systems are the most frequently cited reasons for preferring home delivery with the help of a TBA. Other major reasons for choosing home delivery included financial constraints, inadequate knowledge about services offered by the health care facilities and lack of awareness about service delivery points, poor road conditions, and lack of transportation to reach the nearest health facility. Poor quality of services at the health care facility, perceived fear of undergoing cesarean delivery at the health care facility, and lack of lady doctors at the health care facilities also had a significant impact on the choice of home delivery. To further increase health facility-based delivery in Bangladesh, there is an urgent need to design a comprehensive maternal health program with culturally appropriate interventions, duly addressing the reasons for preferring home delivery that have been identified in this study. In the long run, promoting women’s education, reducing poverty, and improving the quality of all services at the health care facilities, particularly in the rural hinterlands of Bangladesh, would improve maternal health and pregnancy outcomes in the communities and reduce high maternal mortality.
Article Details
References
World Health Organization (WHO). Trends in maternal mortality 2000 to 2017: estimates by WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA, World Bank Group and the United Nations Population Division [Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2019. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/327596.
AbouZahr C. Global burden of maternal death and disability. Br Med Bull. 2003; 67:1–11.
Khan KS, W.D, Say L, Gulmezoglu AM, Van Look P. WHO systematic review of causes of maternal deaths. Lancet. 2006; 367:1066–1074.
Harvey SA, Ayabacab P, Bucaguc M, Djibrinad S, Edsona WN, Gbangbadee S, et al.: Skilled birth attendant competence: An initial assessment in four countries, and implications for the safe motherhood movement. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2004; 87:203–210.
Paxton A, Bailey P, Lobis S and Fry D. Global patterns in availability of emergency obstetric care. Int. J. Gynecol and Obstet [Internet]. 2006;93,300 –307. Available from: http://doi:10.1016/j.ijgo.2006.01.030
Campbell OM and Graham WJ. Strategies for reducing maternal mortality: getting on with what works. Lancet. 2006;368(9543):1284 –99.
WHO. WHO recommendations on antenatal care for a positive pregnancy experience [Internet]. 2016. Available from: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/ 10665/250796/1/9789241549912-eng.pdf?ua = 1.
WHO. World health statistics 2017: Monitoring health for the SDGs, Sustainable Development Goals. WHO [Internet]. 2017. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/255336.
National Institute of Population Research and Training (NIPORT), and ICF. Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey 2017-18. Dhaka, Bangladesh, and Rockville, Maryland, USA: NIPORT and ICF [Internet]. 2020. Available from: https:// dhsprogram.com/pubs/pdf/FR344/FR344.pdf.
Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Bangladesh, Partnership for Maternal, Newborn & Child Health, WHO, World Bank and Alliance for Health Policy and Systems Research. Success Factors for Women’s and Children’s Health: Bangladesh [Internet]. 2015. Available from: https://www.who.int/pmnch/ knowledge/publications/bangladesh_country_report.pdf?ua = 1
Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics (BBS). Population and Housing Census 2011: Bangladesh at a Glance. BBS [Internet]. 2012. Available from: http://www .bbs.gov.bd/WebTestApplication/userfiles/Image/Census2011/Bangladesh_glance.pdf.
UNFPA. Maternal Mortality Statistics by Region and by Country [Internet]. 2002. Available from: http://www. unfpa.org/rh/mothers/statsbycountry.htm
Yaya S, Bishwajit G and Ekholuenetale M. Factors associated with the utilization of institutional delivery services in Bangladesh. PLoS ONE. 2017; 12(2):e0171573.
Al Kibria GM1, Ghosh S, Hossen S, Barsha RAA, Atia Sharmeen A, Uddin SMI. Factors affecting deliveries attended by skilled birth attendants in Bangladesh. Maternal Health, Neonatology, and Perinatology 2017;3:7. doi: 10.1186/s40748–017–0046–0
Islam N, Islam MT, Yoshimura Y. Practices and determinants of delivery by skilled birth attendants in Bangladesh. Reprod Health. 2014;11: 86–4755–11–86. .
Kabir, MA, Goh, KL, Khan,MMH, Al-Amin AQ, Azam MN. Safe Delivery Practices: Experience From Cross sectional Data of Bangladeshi Women. Asia Pac J Public Health. 2012; 27(2) NP1170–NP1181
Sarker BK, Rahman M, Rahman T, Hossain J, Reichenbach L, Mitra DK. Reasons for Preference of Home Delivery with Traditional Birth Attendants (TBAs) in Rural Bangladesh: A Qualitative Exploration. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(1): e0146161.
Strauss AL, Corbin JM. Basics of qualitative research (Vol. 15), Newbury Park, CA: Sage 1990.
Corbin J, Strauss A. Basics of qualitative research. London: Sage 2008.
Maxwell JA. Qualitative research design: An interactive approach. London: Sage 2012.
Ritchie J, Lewis J, Nicholls CM, Ormston R. Qualitative research practice: a guide for social science students and researchers. second ed. Los Angeles: SAGE 2014.
Shah N, Rohra DK, Shams H, Khan NH. Home deliveries: Reasons and adverse outcomes in women presenting to a tertiary care hospital. J Pak Med Assoc. 2010;60:555‑8
Shah R, Rehfuess EA, Paudel D, Maskey MK, Delius M. Barriers and facilitators to institutional delivery in rural areas of Chitwan district, Nepal: a qualitative study. Reproductive Health. 2018; 15:110
Shiferaw S, Spigt M, Godefrooij M, Yilma Melkamu Y, Tekie M. Why do women prefer home births in Ethiopia?. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2013; 13:5.
Gebrehiwot T, Goicolea I, Edin K, San Sebastian M. Making pragmatic choices: Women’s experiences of delivery care in Northern Ethiopia. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2012;12:113.
Sychareun V, Hansana V, Somphet V, Xayavong S, Phengsavanh A, Popenoe R, et al. Reasons rural Laotians choose home deliveries over delivery at health facilities: A qualitative study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2012;12:86.
Sarkar A, Kharmujai OM, Lynrah W, Suokhrie NU. Factors influencing the place of delivery in rural Meghalaya, India: A qualitative study. J Family Med Prim Care. 2018;7:98–103.
Imogie A, Agwubike E, Aluko K. Assessing the role of traditional birth attendants (TBAs) in health care delivery in Edo State, Nigeria. Afr J Reprod Health. 2002; 6(2):94–100.
Titaley CR, Hunter CL, Dibley MJ, Heywood P. Why do some women still prefer traditional birth attendants and home delivery?: a qualitative study on delivery care services in West Java Province, Indonesia. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2010;10:43.
Gabrysch S, Cousens S, Cox J, Campbell OM. The influence of distance and level of care on delivery place in rural Zambia: A study of linked national data in a geographic information system. PLoS Med. 2011; 8:e1000394.
Islam A and Biswas T. Health System in Bangladesh: Challenges and Opportunities. Am J Health Research. 2014; 2(6), 366–374. doi: 10.11648/ j.ajhr.20140206.18
Mahmood SAI. Health Systems in Bangladesh: Editorial. Health System and Policy Research. 2012;1(1),1–4, doi:10.3823/1100, www.hsprj.com.]