Blood loss estimation by Visual Assessment of stained surgical Gauze in Nakhonphanom hospital : An Experimental study

Authors

  • Torpat Pongpit Anesthesiology Department, Nakhonphanom hospital

Keywords:

Blood loss estimation, Visual analogue scale, Surgical gauze, ; Intraoperative hemorrhage, Patient safety

Abstract

Background: Accurate intraoperative blood loss estimation is essential for guiding fluid management and transfusion decisions. Underestimation may cause hypovolemia and hemodynamic instability, while overestimation can result in unnecessary transfusions and related complications. Visual estimation remains the most common technique due to its simplicity, but it is often inaccurate, particularly when blood is absorbed into surgical gauze.

Objective: To develop a visual analogue model for estimating blood loss absorbed by surgical gauze commonly used in Nakhon Phanom Hospital, in order to improve the accuracy of visual assessment.

Methods: This experimental study employed expired screened blood and surgical gauze of various sizes (4×4 inch, 3×18 inch, 12×12 inch, and 15×15 inch). Known blood volumes were applied and absorbed into the gauze. Photographs of stained surfaces were taken to construct visual reference models. The maximum absorption capacity of each gauze type was determined, and percentage stain coverage was correlated with blood volume.

Results: The maximum absorption capacity was 10 mL for 4×4 inch gauze, 100 mL for 3×18 inch swab, 200 mL for 12×12 inch swab, and 400 mL for 15×15 inch swab. A visual analogue scale was developed to assist clinicians in estimating intraoperative blood loss more accurately.

Conclusion: The gauze-based visual analogue model may improve the accuracy of intraoperative blood loss estimation, thereby reducing clinical errors related to under- or overestimation. Further validation in real surgical settings is recommended before clinical implementation.

References

Bose P, Regan F, Paterson-Brown S. Improving the accuracy of estimated blood loss at obstetric haemorrhage using clinical reconstructions. BJOG. 2006;113(8):919–24.

Gerdessen L, Meybohm P. The accuracy of blood loss estimation after simulated vaginal delivery: measurement vs. visual estimation. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2014;289(5):1107–13.

Ali MA, Khan SA, Malik MA. Observer variability in estimation of blood loss. Pak J Med Sci. 2015;31(4):961–4.

Johar R, Smith RP. Assessing blood loss: visual estimation versus gravimetric analysis. Br J Midwifery. 2013;21(1):40–3.

Shander A, Hofmann A, Ozawa S, Theusinger OM, Gombotz H, Spahn DR. Activitybased costs of blood transfusions in surgical patients at four hospitals. Transfusion. 2010;50(4):753–65.

Carson JL, Guyatt G, Heddle NM, Grossman BJ, Cohn CS, Fung MK, et al. Clinical practice guidelines from the AABB: Red blood cell transfusion thresholds and storage. JAMA. 2016;316(19):2025–35.

Razvi K, Chua S, Arulkumaran S, Ratnam SS. A comparative study of visual estimation of blood loss with other methods. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 1996;22(6):401–4.

Stafford I, Dildy GA, Clark SL, Belfort MA. Visually estimated and calculated blood loss in vaginal and cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;199(5):519.e1–7.

Toledo P, McCarthy RJ, Hewlett BJ, Fitzgerald PC, Wong CA. The accuracy of blood loss estimation after simulated vaginal delivery. Anesth Analg. 2007;105(6):1736–4

Downloads

Published

2025-12-08

How to Cite

1.
Pongpit T. Blood loss estimation by Visual Assessment of stained surgical Gauze in Nakhonphanom hospital : An Experimental study. Nakhonphanom Hosp J [internet]. 2025 Dec. 8 [cited 2026 Jan. 24];12(3):E284402. available from: https://he01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/nkpjournal_9/article/view/284402