Main Article Content
Objective: To evaluate visual field recovery after pars plana vitrectomy procedure for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment.
Design: Prospective case series.
Method: These series were conducted in 8 patients (8 eyes) with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment at Thammasat eye center. Each patient who was diagnosed rhegmatogenous retinal detachment had to perform visual field test (CTVF 24-2 and CTVF120 degree) on the first visit, post operation at month 1st and month 3rd . The number of threshold spots were recorded as visual field score, then calculated and compared statistically.
Result: After successful reattachment surgery, the visual field score mostly raised within the first post-operative month and then slowly raised through the third month both CTVF 24-2 and CTVF 120 degree strategy. The CTVF 24-2 and CTVF 120 degree visual field significantly increased (P < 0.05) when compared between pre-operation and 1st month-post operation. However CTVF 120 degree visual field did not significantly increase when compared between 1st month and 3rd month-post operation (P = 0.396). There were some notices that in case of macular-on rhegmatogenous retinal detachment the visual field might not improve surprisingly when compared with macular-off rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. This might be from good baseline visual function including visual field, so when after surgery the visual function tended to be a little improvement.
Conclusion: Visual field recovery was significantly increased in the first month after successful retinal reattachment surgery and steadily through the third month.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
2. Electroretinographic Changes Following Retinal Reattachment Surgery. J Ophthalmic Vis Res 2013; 8 (4): 321-329.
3. Kanski J; Clinical Ophthalmology: A Systematic Approach (7th Ed); Butterworth Heinemann (2011)
4. Mitry D, Charteris DG, Yorston D, et al; The epidemiology and socioeconomic associations of retinal detachment. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2010 Oct; 51(10):4963-8.
5. Management of Acute Retinal Detachment; Royal College of Ophthalmologists (June 2010).
6. Mitry D, Charteris DG, Fleck BW, et al; The epidemiology of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: geographical variation. Br J Ophthalmol. 2010 Jun; 94(6):678-84.
7. Management of Acute Retinal Detachment; Royal College of Ophthalmologists (June 2010).
8. Denniston AKO, Murray PI; Oxford Handbook of Ophthalmology (OUP), 2009.
9. Kang HK, Luff AJ. Management of retinal detachment: a guide for non-ophthalmologists. BMJ 2008 May 31; 336(7655):1235-40.
10. Kang HK, Luff AJ; Management of retinal detachment: a guide for non-ophthalmologists. BMJ. 2008 May 31; 336(7655):1235-40.
11. Hana Abouzeid and Thomas J. Wolfensberger. Macular recovery after retinal detachment. Acta Ophthalmol. Scand. 2006: 84: 597–605
12. Visual Recovery after Scleral Buckling Procedure for Retinal Detachment Ophthalmology 2006;113:1734–1742.
13. William H. Ross, Frank A.Visual recovery after retinal detachment. Current Opinion in Ophthalmology 2000, 11:191–194.
14. Guerin CJ, Lewis GP, Fisher SK, Anderson DH. Recovery of photoreceptor outer segment length and analysis of membrane assembly rates in regenerating primate photoreceptor outer segments. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1993;34:175-183.
15. Anderson DH, Guerin CJ, Erickson PA, Stern WH, Fisher SK. Morphological recovery in the reattached retina. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1986;27:168-183.