Comparison of assessment and follow-up for benign eyelid lesions: Tele-oculoplastic application versus face-to-face visits in Thammasat hospital.

Main Article Content

Gaanchisa Vongchaiyakit
Yada Sukumalpaiboon
Navapol Kanchanaranya

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the accuracy and feasibility of a tele-oculoplastic application for monitoring benign eyelid lesions compared with face-to-face outpatient follow-up.


Design: Prospective cohort pilot study.


Methods: Thirty adult patients diagnosed with benign eyelid lesions at the outpatient clinic of Thammasat Hospital between March 1st and August 31st, 2024 were prospectively enrolled. After diagnosis, patients were registered in a tele-oculoplastic application, and baseline lesion photographs were obtained. Follow-up assessments were conducted using both the application and in-person clinic visits. Within 24 hours before or after the clinic visit, patients submitted updated symptoms and photographs via the application. Two consultant oculoplastic surgeons independently evaluated the cases: one through face-to-face examination and the other through the application. Management decisions were categorized as discharge, continued follow-up, or surgery.


Results: Concordance between telemedicine-based and face-to-face assessments was observed in 25 of 30 patients (83.3%), while discordance occurred in 5 patients (16.7%). Patient satisfaction with symptom monitoring via the application was high (mean ± SD, 4.10 ± 0.85), and ease of use was rated favorably (mean ± SD, 3.90 ± 0.96).


Conclusion: This pilot study suggests that a tele-oculoplastic application is a feasible option for monitoring selected benign eyelid lesions and may reduce unnecessary outpatient visits. Larger, multicenter studies are required to validate these findings and assess broader applicability.

Article Details

Section
Original Study

References

Wilson LS, Maeder AJ. Recent Directions in Telemedicine: Review of Trends in Research and Practice. Healthcare Informatics Research [Internet]. 2015;21(4):213. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4659877/

Nyi-Nyi Zayar, Nitichen Kittiratchakool, Thanayut Saeraneesopon, Rukmanee Butchon, Saudamini Vishwanath Dabak, Patiphak Namahoot, et al. Telemedicine Utilization Patterns and Implications Amidst COVID-19 Outbreaks in Thailand Under Public Universal Coverage Scheme. INQUIRY The Journal of Health Care Organization Provision and Financing [Internet]. 2024 Jan 1 [cited 2024 Oct 19];61. Available from: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11056088/

Kang S, Dehabadi M, Sim DA, Thomas PBM, Appiah Ewusi D, Ezra D. Accuracy of periocular lesion assessment using telemedicine. BMJ Health & Care Informatics. 2021 Jan;28(1):e100287.

Verma M, Raman R, Mohan RE. Application of tele-ophthalmology in remote diagnosis and management of adnexal and orbital diseases. Indian Journal of Ophthalmology [Internet]. 2009 Sep 1 [cited 2021 Mar 29];57(5):381–4. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19700877/

Kang S, Thomas PBM, Sim DA, Parker RT, Daniel C, Uddin JM. Oculoplastic video-based telemedicine consultations: Covid-19 and beyond. Eye. 2020 May 12;34(7):1193–5.

Jamison A, Diaper C, Drummond S, Tejwani D, Gregory ME, Cauchi P, et al. Telemedicine in Oculoplastics. Ophthalmic Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery. 2020 Nov 4;Publish Ahead of Print.

Boissin C, Fleming J, Wallis L, Hasselberg M, Laflamme L. Can We Trust the Use of Smartphone Cameras in Clinical Practice? Laypeople Assessment of Their Image Quality. Telemedicine and e-Health. 2015 Nov;21(11):887–92.

Roa L, T Gómez-Cı́a, Acha B, Serrano C. Digital imaging in remote diagnosis of burns. Burns. 1999 Nov 1;25(7):617–23.

Van der Heijden JP, Thijssing L, Witkamp L, Spuls PI, de Keizer NF. Accuracy and reliability of teledermatoscopy with images taken by general practitioners during everyday practice. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare. 2013 Sep;19(6):320–5.

Hind J, Edington M, McFall K, Salina E, C Diaper, Drummond S, et al. An image-based eyelid lesion management service—evaluation of a pilot. Eye. 2021 Jun 25;36(6):1314–8.

Jani PD, Forbes L, Choudhury A, Preisser JS, Viera AJ, Garg S. Evaluation of Diabetic Retinal Screening and Factors for Ophthalmology Referral in a Telemedicine Network. JAMA Ophthalmology [Internet]. 2017 Jul 1 [cited 2021 May 26];135(7):706. Available from: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamaophthalmology/fullarticle/2627936

Avidor D, Loewenstein A, Waisbourd M, Nutman A. Cost-effectiveness of diabetic retinopathy screening programs using telemedicine: a systematic review. Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation. 2020 Apr 6;18(1).

Ting DSW, Tan GSW. Telemedicine for Diabetic Retinopathy Screening. JAMA Ophthalmology. 2017 Jul 1;135(7):722.

Ah-Kye L, Butt A, Gupta AK, Timlin HM, Daniel C, Uddin J, et al. Introducing the “Benign Eyelid Lesion Pathway”: 1 year experience of synchronous tele-oculoplastics in a tertiary hospital. 2022 Jul 4;