Hearing Protection Device Use Behaviors and Personal Attenuation Rating (PAR) among Production Workers in an Electrical Appliance Component Factory in Chonburi Province

Authors

  • Arutchaporn Chiamchunya Industrial Medicine Center, Department of Disease Control, Industrial Medicine Center, Queen Savang Vadhana Memorial Hospital, Thai Red Cross Society
  • Saksith Kulwong Faculty of Public Health, Burapha University
  • Anamai Thetkathuek Faculty of Public Health, Burapha University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14456/dcj.2026.21

Keywords:

hearing protection device, behavior, personal attenuation rating, workers

Abstract

This cross-sectional analytical research aimed to study: 1) hearing protection device (HPD) uses behaviors, 2) Personal Attenuation Ratings (PAR), and 3) the association between HPD use behaviors and PAR. The study participants were 120 production workers at an electrical appliance manufacturing company in Chonburi province. Data was collected from July to August 2025 using a self-administered questionnaire, an HPD use behavior observation form, and the hearing protection fit-testing system. Data was analyzed using descriptive statistics and binary logistic regression analysis. The results showed that the majority of workers were male (87.5%) and aged 30-39 years (43.3%). While 81.7% of workers regularly wore HPDs when exposed to loud noise, only 22.5% performed HPD maintenance correctly. The median PAR was 17 dB (IQR(Q1-Q3):9(11-20)). A total of 81.7% of workers achieved a PAR greater than or equal to the Target PAR. Workers who did not regularly wear HPDs with a proper tight fit had 4.28 times higher odds of having an inadequate PAR compared to those who did (AOR=4.28, 95% CI: 1.53-11.95). However, 18.3% of workers had a PAR below the target, which could lead to hazardous noise exposure and long-term noise-induced hearing loss. Therefore, workplaces should emphasize correct HPD wearing and provide training on both usage and maintenance. Additionally, relevant agencies should establish a policy for hearing protection fit testing to effectively reduce the risk of occupational noise exposure.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Chen KH, Su SB, Chen KT. An overview of occupational noise-induced hearing loss among workers: epidemiology, pathogenesis, and preventive measures. Environ Health Prev Med. 2020;25(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s12199-020-00906-0

Karki T, Manandhar R, Neupane D, Mahat D, Ban P. Critical analysis of noise pollution and its effect on human health. Int J Educ Life Sci. 2024;2:161-76. doi: 10.59890/ijels.v2i2.1372

de Souza TCF, Périssé ARS, Moura M. Noise exposure and hypertension: investigation of a silent relationship. BMC Public Health. 2015; 15(1):328. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-1671-z

Keller S, Tschan F, Beldi G, Kurmann A, Candinas D, Semmer NK. Noise peaks influence communication in the operating room: an observational study. Ergonomics. 2016;59(12):1541 -52. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2016.1159736

Social Security Office, Ministry of Labour. Situation of work-related injuries and illnesses 2020 - 2024 [Internet]. Bangkok: Workmen's Compensation Fund Office, Social Security Office; 2025 [cited 2025 Aug 4]. Available from: https://www.sso.go.th/wpr/assets/upload/files_storage/sso_th/65e64958a0565ddc98ebc2ee6cc1fbf4.pdf (in Thai)

Selleck AM, Djalilian HR, Erbele ID. An update on noise-induced hearing loss. AAO-HNS Bulletin [Internet]. 2023 [cited 2025 May 5]. Available from: https://bulletin.entnet.org/clinical-patient-care/article/22766198/an-update-on-noiseinduced-hearing-loss

National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. Understand Noise Exposure [Internet]. 2023 [cited 2025 May 20]. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/noise/prevent/understand.html

WorkSafe New Zealand. Managing noise risks [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2025 May 20]. Available from: https://www.worksafe.govt.nz/topic-and-industry/noise/managing-noise-risks/

Health and Safety Executive. Workplace design for noise reduction [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2025 May 20]. Available from: https://www.hse.gov.uk/noise/goodpractice/workplacedesign.htm

Department of Labour Protection and Welfare. Announcement on the standard of permissible noise levels for employees on average throughout the working day, B.E. 2560 (2017). Bangkok: Government Gazette; 2017. (in Thai)

Ministry of Labour. Ministerial regulation prescribing standards for the management, administration, and operations regarding safety, occupational health, and working environment related to heat, light, and sound, B.E. 2559 (2016). Bangkok: Government Gazette; 2016. (in Thai)

Department of Labour Protection and Welfare. Announcement on the calculation of sound levels perceived in the ear when wearing personal protective equipment, B.E. 2561 (2018). Bangkok: Government Gazette; 2018. (in Thai)

Occupational Safety and Health Administration, National Hearing Conservation Association. Alliance recommendation for fit testing: best practice bulletin on hearing protection - emerging trends: individual fit testing. Washington (DC): U.S. Department of Labor; 2008.

Murphy WJ, Gong W, Karch SJ, Federman J, Schulz TY. Personal attenuation ratings versus derated noise reduction ratings for hearing protection devices. J Acoust Soc Am. 2022; 152(2):1074-89. doi: 10.1121/10.0013418

Berger EH. Comparing hearing protector ratings -NRR, SNR, SLC80, and others [Technical Bulletin] [Internet]. St. Paul (MN): 3M Personal Safety Division; 2005 [cited 2025 Dec 18]. Available from: https://multimedia.3m.com/mws/media/927833O/hearing-protector-ratings.pdf

Canadian Centre for Occupational Health and Safety. Hearing protectors [Internet]. 2023 [cited 2025 May 8]. Available from: https://www.ccohs.ca/oshanswers/prevention/ppe/ear_prot.html

WorkSafe Victoria. Hearing protection [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2025 May 8]. Available from: https://www.worksafe.vic.gov.au/hearing-protection

Fauzan NS, Sukadarin EH, Widia M, Irianto I, Ghazali I. A systematic literature review of the factors influencing hearing protection device usage among industrial workers. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023;20(4):2934. doi: 10. 3390/ijerph20042934

McGuinn P, Buggy C, Drummond A, Sripaiboonkij P. Factors influencing the use of hearing protection devices in Irish mine workers. Int J Occup Environ Saf. 2021;5:51-61. doi: 10. 24840/2184-0954_005.002_0005

Guo J, Shu L, Wen W, Xu G, Zhan L, Yan M, et al. The influencing factors of hearing protection device usage among noise-exposed workers in Guangdong Province: a structural equation modeling-based survey. BMC Public Health. 2024;24 (1):1044. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18428-7

Berger EH. What is a personal attenuation rating (PAR)? [Technical Bulletin] [Internet]. St. Paul (MN): 3M Occupational Health & Environmental Safety Division; 2010 [cited 2025 Dec 12]. Available from: https://multimedia.3m.com/mws/media/927828O/personal-attenuation-rating.pdf?fn=02%20personal%20attenuation%20rating.p

3M Personal Safety Division. Hearing protection fit testing: what, why and how [Technical Bulletin] [Internet]. St. Paul (MN): 3M; 2018 Aug [cited 2025 Dec 12]. Available from: https://multimedia.3m.com/mws/media/1585320O/3m-value-story-of-hearing-fit-testing.pdf

Udtabud J, Kalampakorn S, Boonyamalik P, Jarupat Maruo S. Effects of a hearing protection training with ear fit test feedback on hearing protection use among workers in auto part manufacturing industry. J Public Health Nurs. 2024;38(2):40-54.

Long JS. Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publications; 1997.

Peduzzi P, Concato J, Kemper E, Holford TR, Feinstein AR. A simulation study of the number of events per variable in logistic regression analysis. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 1996;49(12):1373-9. doi: 10.1016/S0895-4356(96)00236-3

Acoustical Society of America. ANSI/ASA S12.71-2018: Performance criteria for systems that estimate the attenuation of passive hearing protectors for individual users. Melville (NY): Acoustical Society of America; 2018.

3M Personal Safety Division. 3M™ E-A-Rfit™ Dual-Ear Validation System: hearing protection fit-testing eBook [Internet]. St. Paul (MN): 3M; [cited 2025 Dec 12]. Available from: https://multimedia.3m.com/mws/media/1782213O/3m-e-a-rfit-dual-ear-validation-system.pdf

Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S, Sturdivant RX. Applied logistic regression. 3rd ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons; 2013.

Reddy RK, Welch D, Thorne P, Ameratunga S. Hearing protection use in manufacturing workers: a qualitative study. Noise Health. 2012;14(59): 202-9. doi: 10.4103/1463-1741.99896

3M Personal Safety Division. 3M™ E-A-Rfit™ Dual-Ear Validation System Compliance with ANSI/ASA S12.71-2018: frequently asked questions [Internet]. St. Paul (MN): 3M; [cited 2025 Dec 15]. Available from: https://multimedia.3m.com/mws/media/1744256O/3m-e-a-rfit-dual-ear-validation-system-compliance-with-ansi-asa-s12-71-2018-faq.pdf

Idota N, Horie S, Tsutsui T, Inoue J. Noise attenuation characteristics of a foam type earplug measured using a dummy head. J UOEH. 2002;24(1):11-8. doi: 10.7888/juoeh.24.11

3M Personal Safety Division. Hearing Protection Attenuation Tables [Internet]. St. Paul (MN): 3M; [cited 2025 Dec 18]. Available from: https://multimedia.3m.com/mws/media/91870O/attenuation-tables.pdf

Morata TC, Gong W, Brogan A. Enhancing workplace safety: a systematic review of hearing protection fit-testing systems and training [Internet]. NIOSH Science Blog. 2024 Jul 30 [cited 2025 May 10]. Available from: https://blogs.cdc.gov/niosh-science-blog/2024/07/30/hearing-protection-fit-testing/

Hayes ME, Hammond S, Montgomery AP, Stephenson L. Improving hearing protection device noise attenuation through fit-testing in an occupational health clinic. Workplace Health Saf. 2022;70(4):196-204. doi: 10.1177/2165 0799211067927

Shu L, Fan Z, Tang J, Xu G, Guo J, Long T, et al. The protective effect of wearing hearing protection devices in noise-induced hearing loss and its potential influencing factors in the Chinese adult population. Sci Total Environ. 2025; 964:178507. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2025. 178507

Downloads

Published

2026-06-25

How to Cite

1.
Chiamchunya A, Kulwong S, Thetkathuek A. Hearing Protection Device Use Behaviors and Personal Attenuation Rating (PAR) among Production Workers in an Electrical Appliance Component Factory in Chonburi Province. Dis Control J [internet]. 2026 Jun. 25 [cited 2026 Jul. 1];52(2):253-66. available from: https://he01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/DCJ/article/view/283004

Issue

Section

Original Article