Bioefficacy of commercial household insecticide products against insecticide-resistant Aedes aegypti (L.) from Chanthaburi province

Authors

  • Phubeth Ya-umphan National Institute of Health, Department of Medical Sciences
  • Sunaiyana Sathantriphop National Institute of Health, Department of Medical Sciences
  • Pongsakorn Mukkhun National Institute of Health, Department of Medical Sciences
  • Sunisa Onkong National Institute of Health, Department of Medical Sciences
  • Pungasem Paeporn National Institute of Health, Department of Medical Sciences
  • Archawin Rojanawiwat National Institute of Health, Department of Medical Sciences

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14456/dcj.2022.69

Keywords:

Aedes aegypti, insecticide resistance, dengue vector control, household insecticide products

Abstract

The objective of this research was to assess the bioefficacy of household insecticide products used against mosquitoes that available in Thailand supermarkets, 2019-2021. The products were tested using the accredited bioassay glass chamber technique according to ISO/IEC 17025:2017 against the pyrethroid-resistant dengue vector Aedes aegypti L. collected from Chanthaburi Province compared with a laboratory susceptible strain.  The results showed that mat electric vaporizer (1 product), liquid electric vaporizers (3 products), mosquito coils (4 products) and aerosol sprays (11 products) killed the laboratory susceptible strain of Ae. aegypti with the mortality rates of 58.3%, 38.3-45.0%, 95.0-100% and 100%, respectively. The resistant Chanthaburi population exhibited the mortality rates of 76.7% for mat electric vaporizer, 0% for liquid electric vaporizers, 0-55.0% for mosquito coils and 21.7-100% for aerosol sprays. All the tested products displayed higher knockdown time at 50% (KT50) and 90% (KT90) against the resistant Chanthaburi population than the laboratory susceptible strain. Overall, the aerosol spray 01 with permethrin and cypermethrin as active ingredients displayed the highest efficacy (100% mortality rate) to both the laboratory and field strains (p>0.05), followed by the aerosol spray 02 with pyrethrins and piperonyl butoxide (PBO) and the aerosol spray 03 with permethrin, esbiothrin, and d-allethrin that showed 96.7% and 95.0% mortality rate of field population, respectively. The results of this study indicated that the aerosol spray 01, the aerosol spray 02 and the aerosol spray 03 should be the potential candidates which are active against insecticide-resistant dengue mosquitoes. However, further studies on field trials should be conducted to confirm these results.

References

World Health Organization. Dengue and severe dengue [Internet]. 2021. [cited 2021 Mar 15]. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/dengue-and-severe-dengue

Division of vector borne diseases, Department of disease control, Ministry of public health (TH) [Internet]. 2021. [cited 2021 Mar 15]. Available from: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1TTaSvaYYamVwA5Ig7ATZJmIcHBuGXOSb (in Thai)

Division of vector borne diseases, Department of disease control, Ministry of public health (TH) [Internet]. 2021. [cited 2021 Mar 15]. Available from: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1P4PKW0dMDnrO9kGXhi9PwTUA23PXhmQk (in Thai)

World Health Organization. Safety of pyrethroids for public health use. World Health Organization; 2005.

Cuervo-Parra JA, Cortés TR, Ramirez-Lepe M. Mosquito-Borne Diseases, Pesticides Used for Mosquito Control, and Development of Resistance to Insecticides. In: Trdan S, editor. Insecticides Resistance. London: IntechOpen; 2016. p. 111-34.

Bureau of Laboratory Quality Standards. Department of Medical Sciences, Ministry of Public Health (TH). [Internet]. 2021. [cited 2021 Mar 15]. Available from: http://webdb.dmsc.moph.go.th/ifc_qa/dbqa/default.asp?iID=EJFIDH

Paeporn P, Sathantriphop S, Ya-umphan P, Mukkhun P, Tassanai P, Tanopas A. Bioefficiency test of aerosol insecticide products against a dengue vector, Aedes aegypti. J Health Sci. 2021;30:162-8. (in Thai)

World Health Organization. Guidelines for efficacy testing of household insecticide products. Mosquito coils, Vaporizer mats, Liquid vaporizers, Ambient emanators and Aerosol. World Health Organization; 2009.

World Health Organization. Monitoring and managing insecticide resistance in Aedes mos-quito populations Interim guidance for entomol¬ogists. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2016.

Ya-umphan P, Sathantriphop S, Mukkhun P, Paeporn P, Ritthison W. Insecticide susceptibility characterization and efficacy of insecticides for thermal space spray application against insecticide-resistant Aedes aegypti (L.) from Chanthaburi Province. Dis Control J. 2021;4:967-81. (in Thai)

Abbott WS. A method for computing the effectiveness of an insecticide.1925. J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 1987;3(2):302-3.

Duncan BD. Multiple range and multiple F tests. Biometrics.1955;11(1):1–42.

Ogoma SB, Moore SJ, Maia MF. A systematic review of mosquito coils and passive emanators: defining recommendations for spatial repellency testing methodologies. Parasites Vectors. 2012;5:287.

Bohbot JD, Fu L, Le TC, Chauhan KR, Cantrell CL, Dickens JC. Multiple activities of insect repellents on odorant receptors in mosquitoes. Med Vet Entomol. 2011;25:436-44.

Pemba D, Kadangwe C. Mosquito control aerosols’ efficacy based on pyrethroids constituents. In: Perveen F, editor. Insecticides-advances in integrated pest management. London: IntechOpen; 2012.

Sathantriphop S, Onkong S, Paeporn P, Ya-umphan P, Mukkhun P, Bang MJ, et al. Knockdown and lethal effects of three mosquito coil formulations against Aedes aegypti and Culex quinquefasciatus under different nutritional conditions. J Asia Pac Entomol. 2019;22(4):1046-52.

Dong K. Insect sodium channels and insecticide resistance. Invert Neurosci. 2007;7(1):17-30.

Fonseca-González I, Quiñones ML, McAllister J, Brogdon WG. Mixed-function oxidases and esterases associated with cross-resistance between DDT and lambda-cyhalothrin in Anopheles darlingi Root 1926 populations from Colombia. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2009;104(1):18-26.

Kawada H, Iwasaki T, Loan LL, Tien TK, Mai NTN, Shono Y, et al. Field evaluation of spatial repellency of metofluthrin impregnated lattice work plastic strips against Aedes aegypti (L.) and analysis of environmental factors affecting its efficacy in My Tho City,Tien Giang, Vietnam. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2006;75:1153-7.

Bingham G, Strode C, Tran L, Khoa PT, Jamet HP. Can piperonyl butoxide enhance the efficacy of pyrethroids against pyrethroid-resistant Aedes aegypti? Trop Med Int Health. 2011;16(4):492-500.

Matsumura F. Toxicology of Insecticides. Boston: Springer; 1985.

Aïzoun N, Aïkpon R, Padonou GG, Oussou O, Oké-Agbo F, Gnanguenon V, et al. Mixed-function oxidases and esterases associated with permethrin, deltamethrin and bendiocarb resistance in Anopheles gambiae s.l. in the south-north transect Benin, West Africa. Parasites Vectors. 2013;6:223.

Kakko I, Toimela T, Tähti H. Piperonyl butoxide potentiates the synaptosome ATPase inhibiting effect of pyrethrin. Chemosphere. 2000;40:301-5.

Kuri-Morales PA, Correa-Morales F, González-Acosta C, Moreno-Garcia M, Dávalos-Becerril E, Benitez-Alva JI. Efficacy of 13 commercial household aerosol insecticides against Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) From Morelos, Mexico. J Med Entomol. 2017;55(2):417-22.

Nachaiwieng W, Yanola J, Chamnanya S, Lumjuan N, Somboon P. Efficacy of five commercial household insecticide aerosol sprays against pyrethroid resistant Aedes aegypti and Culex quinquefasciatus mosquitoes in Thailand. Pestic Biochem Physiol. 2021;178(11):104911.

Yoon J, An H, Kim N, Tak JH. Efficacy of seven commercial household aerosol insecticides and formulation-dependent toxicity against Asian tiger mosquito (Diptera: Culicidae). J Med Entomol. 2020;57(5):1560-6.

Downloads

Published

2022-12-30

How to Cite

1.
Ya-umphan P, Sathantriphop S, Mukkhun P, Onkong S, Paeporn P, Rojanawiwat A. Bioefficacy of commercial household insecticide products against insecticide-resistant Aedes aegypti (L.) from Chanthaburi province. Dis Control J [Internet]. 2022 Dec. 30 [cited 2024 May 12];48(4):821-35. Available from: https://he01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/DCJ/article/view/253679

Issue

Section

Original Article