Health service system accessibility of border area communities: Thailand-Lao PDR (Phayao-Xayaburi)


  • Sakesun Thongtip University of Phayao
  • Ronnarong Duangkerd Office of Disease Prevention and Control, Region 1 Chiang Mai
  • Nattawat Danpaiboon Thammasat University
  • Phitsanuruk Kanthawee Mae Fah Luang University
  • Ratsuda Tananpa University of Phayao
  • Anongsin Danpaiboon Office of Disease Prevention and Control, Region 1 Chiang Mai



health service system accessibility, Thailand-Lao PDR border health service system


The survey research was conducted to study health service system accessibility of community-dwelling people in border area of Thailand-Lao PDR (Phayao -Xayaburi). One hundred and twenty-eight people from Phu Sang district, Phayao province and 125 people from Khob district, Xayaburi province were recruited. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics including frequency, percentage, mean, and standard deviation, while inferential statistics used for data analysis included Chi-square test, Fisher’s exact test, and independent t-test. The results indicated that over the past year the subjects in Phu Sang mostly accessed health service system from health promoting hospitals, sub-district-level health centers in Thailand, (59.4%) due to the convenient transportation (78.1%). Across the border from Phu Sang, most people in Khob district tended to access health service system at Khob hospital (99.2%) because they believed in the ability of doctors (57.6%). Healthcare coverage rates among people in Phu Sang and Khob district were 88.3% and 92.8%, respectively. When suffering from severe illnesses, people in Phu Sang district have chosen health services at Chiang Kham hospital (58.6%), whereas those in Khob district have chosen health services at Khob hospital (100.0%). Primary health care survice system in Phu Sang district has provided health education and screening for non-communicable disease (97.7%). Likewise, health education and health counseling with village health volunteers provided by primary health care system in Khob district was found to be at 100.0%. Although the health service system accessibility of the border areas in Thailand and Lao PDR was at a relatively high level, not all people are covered by universal coverage scheme to access medical treatment. Moreover, in-depth information on such aspects as health coverage of hilltribe people who migrated into Thailand, community participation, and satisfaction of health service management was inadequately observed in our study. Hence, all in-depth information should be further studied to develop the effective health service system accessibility.


Download data is not yet available.


Artsanthia J, Chaleoykitti S. Transcultural nursing in ASEAN community. Journal of The Royal Thai Army Nurses. 2016;17(3):10-6.

Rojanasarot S. The impact of the asean community and Thailand’s medical hub aspiration on the Thai health care system. Value in Health. 2014;17(3):A34.

Ministry of Public Health. The health expense situation of the alien population in the 31 border provinces, fiscal year 2015 [Internet].2015 [cited 2020 May 14]. Available from: (in Thai)

Kamwan A, Kessomboon P. Health services accessibility for migrant workers in Chiangkhan district, Loei Province. Community Health Development Quarterly Khon Kaen University. 2016;4(3):359-74.

Haritavorn N, Sukkasem C. Borderless Health: Crossing the borders for health care in Thailand among Burmese, Laotian, and Cambodian [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2020 May 14]. Available from: (in Thai)

Ruttikorn S, Wilawan S, Juntarawijit Y. Health impact of people from Thai-Laos territory trading at Ban Huak, Phusang sub-district, Phayao province. Chiang Mai: Chiang Mai University; 2003.

Suchatsoonthorn C, Sealim S. Thailand’s national and health development status in the world and asia. Journal of Health Science. 2019;28(4):577-90.

Ministry of Public Health. Twenty-year national strategic plan for public health [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2020 May 14]. Available from: (in Thai)

Sealim S. Classification of countries in asia based on health development conditions under the goals of twenty-year national strategic plan for public health (2017-2036). Journal of the Department of Medical Services. 2018;43(6):101-12.

Chantasorn U, Pomjamsri S, Singsuwankul T, Preedawanalert N, Sawangkajorn P. Program for supporting the decision on chi-square test for contingency table. Thai Science and Technology Journal. 2013;21(2):91-103.

Atkinson JA, Vallely A, Fitzgerald L, Whittaker M, Tanner M. The architecture and effect of participation: a systematic review of community participation for communicable disease control and elimination. Implications for malaria elimination. Malar J. 2011;10(1):225.

Ndiaye SM, Quick L, Sanda O, Niandou S. The value of community participation in disease surveillance: a case study from Niger. Health promotion international. 2003;18(2):89-98.

Samerchea S. Health status in Pusang-Chiangkum district. Phayao: Phayao Provincial Health Office Annual Report; 2019.

Cochran WG. Sampling techniques. 3rd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1977.

Kanthawee P, Singharachai C, Muenchan P. The developing communicable disease control system in border area of Thai-Laos: a case study at Chiang Kong district, Chiang Rai Province Final report. 2561:117.

Omarova A, Tussupova K, Hjorth P, Kalishev M, Dosmagambetova R. Water supply challenges in rural areas: a case study from Central Kazakhstan. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(5):688.




How to Cite

Thongtip เ, Duangkerd ร, Danpaiboon ณ, Kanthawee พ, Tananpa ร, Danpaiboon อ. Health service system accessibility of border area communities: Thailand-Lao PDR (Phayao-Xayaburi). Dis Control J [Internet]. 2021 Mar. 31 [cited 2022 Aug. 13];47(1):72-85. Available from:



Original Article