Study of Guideline and Performance Evaluation of Department of Disease Control

Authors

  • ณัฐธิดา สวนคร้ามดี Public Sector Development Group Department of Disease Control

Keywords:

Performance Evaluation, Department of Disease Control

Abstract

This study aimed to study and compare the guidelines for the performance evaluation and the change of scores of the performance commitment of Department of Disease Control during, before and after Ministry of Public Health being the pilot ministry (fiscal year 2007-2010). The method of study was undertaken by collecting data of the document and the performance evaluation manual each year on Office of the Public Sector Development Commission website. The section of study the change of score of the performance commitment of Department of Disease Control, data were compared for analyze the change in scores from year to year. The results revealed that guidelines for the performance evaluation of Department of Disease Control, Ministry of Public Health, during before and after Ministry of Public Health as the pilot phase of the study, differences are as follows: 1) Framework for evaluating, weight and issue of performance evaluation, before as the pilot, framework for evaluating, weight and issue of performance evaluation were set by Office of the Public Sector Development Commission. After as the pilot, framework for evaluating, weight and issue of performance evaluation were set by Ministry of Public Health under framework of Office of the Public Sector Development Commission. However, the pilot could be defined in weight and issue of performance evaluation different from other ministry were significantly. 2) The negotiation of appropriate indicators, weight and criteria of score, before as the pilot, Office of the Public Sector Development Commission hired a consultant for analyze and make recommendations to negotiate the performance commitment. After as the pilot, the working group had been appointed by Ministry of Public Health to operate. 3) To verify the accuracy of detailed indicators (KPI Template) and tracking the progress of the performance commitment of Department of Disease Control, before as the pilot, Office of the Public Sector Development Commission and consultant was main operater. After as the pilot, Office of the Public Sector Development Commission and the working group had been appointed by Ministry of Public Health to operate. 4) Evaluation of the performance commitment of Department of Disease Control, before as the pilot, Office of the Public Sector Development Commission and consultant and agency indicators was the evaluator, after as the pilot, they were evaluated some indicators each year. The change of score of the performance commitment of Department of Disease Control during the 2007-2010 fiscal year has increased especially in D 2 and D 3 were increased steadily in the period after as the pilot.The key factors expected to affect the increase or decrease as a result of the performance commitment, including the difficulty of the indicators, the evaluation of each of the indicators and understanding the details of the assessors.

References

1. สำนักงานคณะกรรมการพัฒนาระบบราชการ . คู่มือ การประเมินผลการปฏิบัติราชการตามคำรับรอง การปฏิบัติราชการของกระทรวงนำร่องประจำปี งบประมาณ พ.ศ. 2552. พิมพ์ครั้งที่ 1 กรุงเทพฯ: สำนักพิมพ์คณะรัฐมนตรีและราชกิจจานุเบกษา, 2552: 7-9.

2. คณะกรรมการพัฒนาระบบราชการ. http://www. opdc.go.th/content.php?menu_id = 4&content_id= 2120 วันที่สืบค้น 27 สิงหาคม 2554

3. คณะกรรมการพัฒนาระบบราชการ. http://www. opdc.go.th/content.php?menu_id =4&content_id=2087 วันที่สืบค้น 27 สิงหาคม 2554.

4. รายงานสรุปภาพรวมการจัดทำคำรับรองการ ปฏิบัติราชการประจำปีงบประมาณ พ.ศ. 2551 ของส่วนราชการนำร่อง. พิมพ์ครั้งที่ 1 กรุงเทพฯ : สำนักพิมพ์คณะรัฐมนตรีและราชกิจจานุเบกษา, 2552: 2.

Downloads

Published

2012-03-30

How to Cite

1.
สวนคร้ามดี ณ. Study of Guideline and Performance Evaluation of Department of Disease Control. Dis Control J [Internet]. 2012 Mar. 30 [cited 2024 May 5];38(1):1-7. Available from: https://he01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/DCJ/article/view/155036

Issue

Section

Original Article