An analytical study of behavioral risks and illness among camel keeper and non-camel keeper at zoo parks in Thailand 2014

Authors

  • เสาวพักตร์ ฮิ้นจ้อย Bureau of Epidemiology, Department of Disease Control
  • พรรณราย สมิตสุวรรณ Bureau of Epidemiology, Department of Disease Control
  • พรรณราย สมิตสุวรรณ Bureau of Epidemiology, Department of Disease Control
  • อาทิชา วงศ์คำมา Bureau of Epidemiology, Department of Disease Control

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14456/dcj.2015.13

Keywords:

behavioral risk, illness, zookeeper, , zoological park

Abstract

Since 2012, a novel corona virus, outbreak of Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS) has been emerged in many parts of the world. Surveys have shown the evidences of neutralizing antibodies in samples from camel in Arabian Peninsula coincided with the same areas where most of human cases were reported. Camel raising was found in some areas of Thailand, especially in zoological parks. The objective of study was to determine behavioral risks and illness among zookeepers. A cross sectional study was conducted in seven zoological parks in 2014. Zoo Keepers were divided into two groups; a group of camel keepers and non-camel keepers. Face to face interview were conducted to obtain information regarding history of animal exposure, use of personal protective equipment (PPE) and history of illness. Univariate analysis and multiple logistic regressions were performed to describe the relationship of illness and behavioral risks for zookeepers. From 50 study populations in this study, 59.50% of zoo-keepers reported regular wearing boots at work, but wearing mask, apron and gloves were low. Four camel keepers and one non-camel keeper reported illness during the study period and seeked treatment at hospitals. One of the camel keepers, who taking care of alpaca was admitted to the hospital with diagnosis of influenza. There was no statistically significant difference of illness between camel keeper and non-camel keeper, and there was no statistically significant difference of illness and behavioral risk factors. Surveillance in a group of close contact with animal should be developed. Effectiveness of enforcement and measure about the use of PPE and training course to provide perceptions of health threats and benefits gained by wearing PPE should be implemented at the zoo parks. With these measures, they can reduce risk of emerging infectious diseases among people having close contact with animals.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Harshit A. Jadav Middle East Respiratory Syndrome-Corona Virus (MERS-CoV): A deadly killer. IOSR Journal of Pharmacy and Biological Sciences (IOSR-JPBS) 2013;8:74-81.

2. World Health Organization. MERS-CoV situation update [Internet]. [2015 June 1]. Available from: www.emro.who.int/images/stories/csr/.../MERS-CoV_March_2015.pdf

3. World Health Organization. Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Corona Virus (MERS-CoV): summary of current situation, literature update and risk assessment - as of 5 February 2015 [Internet]. [2015 June 1]. Available from: https://www.who.int/csr/disease/coronavirus.../mers-5-february-2015.pdf

4. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Factsheet for health professionals 2014 [Internet]. [cited 2015 Jan 13]. Available from: https://www.ecdc. europa.eu/en/healthtopics/coronavirus-infections/mers-factsheet/Pages/default.aspx

5. World Organization of Animal Health. Infection with corona virus in camels, Iran [Internet]. [cited 2015 Jan 13]. Available from: https://www.oie.int/wahis_2/ public/wahid.php/Reviewreport/Review?page_refer=MapFullEventReport&reportid=16411

6. Gossner C, Danielson N, Gervelmeyer A, Berthe F, Faye B, Kaasik AK, et al. Human-dromedary camel interactions and the risk of acquiring zoonotic Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Corona virus Infection. Zoonoses Public Health 2014;Dec27.doi:10.1111/zph.12171.

7. ศิริพร วรรคสังข์, ลักษณีย์ บุญขาว. พฤติกรรมความปลอดภัยในการทำงานของคนงานและการประเมินความเสี่ยงด้านอาชีวอนามัยและความปลอดภัย กรณีศึกษา ร้านรับซื้อของเก่าแห่งหนึ่งในตำบลบ้านกอก อำเภอเขื่องใน จังหวัดอุบลราชธานี [อินเทอร์เน็ต]. [สืบค้นเมื่อ 1 มิ.ย. 2558]. แหล่งข้อมูล: https://www.gotoknow.org/posts/567450

8. Lipscomb HJ. Effectiveness of interventions to prevent work-related eye injuries. Am J Prev Med 2000;8:27-33.

9. Forst L, Noth IM, Lacey S, Bauer S, Skinner S, Petrea R, et al. Barriers and benefits of protective eyewear use by Latino farm workers. J Agromed 2006;11:11-7.

10. David J Hill, Ricky L Langley, W Morgan Morrow. Occupational injuries and illnesses reported by zoo veterinarians in the United States. Journal of Zoo and Wildlife Medicine 1998;29: 371-85.

11. National Association of State Public Health Veterinarians, INC. "Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report: Compendium of measures to prevent disease associated with animals in public settings, 2011". Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR) 2011;60(RR04):1-24.

12. Cherry B, Burns A, Johnson GS, Pfeiffer H, Dumas N, Barrett D, et al. Salmonella Typhimurium outbreak associated with veterinary clinic. Emerg Infect Dis 2004;10:2249-51.

Downloads

Published

2018-09-18

How to Cite

1.
ฮิ้นจ้อย เ, สมิตสุวรรณ พ, สมิตสุวรรณ พ, วงศ์คำมา อ. An analytical study of behavioral risks and illness among camel keeper and non-camel keeper at zoo parks in Thailand 2014. Dis Control J [Internet]. 2018 Sep. 18 [cited 2024 Nov. 18];41(3):190-9. Available from: https://he01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/DCJ/article/view/146048

Issue

Section

Original Article