@article{ทองไพบูลย์_อัศวทวีบุญ_2019, title={Comparative Study to the Rorschach Inkblot Test Interpretation between the Klopfer System and the Rorschach Performance Assessment System (R-PAS)}, volume={64}, url={https://he01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/JPAT/article/view/198825}, abstractNote={<p>Objectives : To analyze and compare the differences and relationships between the interpretations<br>using the R-PAS and the Klopfer systems.<br>Materials and Methods : This study used the case study method. Rorschach responses of 10 patients<br>diagnosed with mental disorders by psychiatrists were interpreted using the Klopfer and R-PAS<br>systems. For the Klopfer system, only the quantitative analysis was used. For the R-PAS system,<br>the interpretive guides generated from the scores processed through the online system were used.<br>The data were analyzed for differences and relationships to find patterns in four areas: cognitive<br>processing, perception and thinking, stress and coping, and interpersonal relationship.<br>Results : With respect to cognitive processing, both systems provided information regarding the<br>application of intelligence but the R-PAS system provided additional information regarding the cognitive<br>process and nature. With respect to perception and thinking, both systems provided information<br>regarding reality testing including psychopathology but the R-PAS system provided additional<br>information on the quality of perception and thinking including severity of psychopathology. With<br>respect to stress and coping, both systems provided information relating to the tendencies for stress<br>and anxiety and reactions to situations but the R-PAS system provided additional information on the<br>risks for self-harm. With respect to interpersonal relationship, the Klopfer system emphasized<br>personality and the development of personality as related to relationships while the R-PAS system<br>emphasized the ability to understand self the others.<br>Conclusion : Interpretation of the Rorschach responses by the R-PAS system is different from the<br>Klopfer system whereby the R-PAS system can provide the information with increasing depth and<br>breadth. The R-PAS system also has well-defined criteria, using standard scores and normative data.<br>Therefore, the R-PAS system should be used in Thailand in order to better understand its strengths<br>and limitations.</p>}, number={2}, journal={Journal of the Psychiatric Association of Thailand}, author={ทองไพบูลย์ กุลวดี and อัศวทวีบุญ บุรชัย}, year={2019}, month={Jun.}, pages={139–148} }