The development of the integrated screening system for diseases prevalent among prisoner–inmates: first admitted, transferred and discharged

Authors

  • Arjin Cholapand Raj Pracha Samasai Institute, Department of Disease Control
  • Nawiya Nuntapanich Raj Pracha Samasai Institute, Department of Disease Control.
  • Jumpol Tantivongsakij Raj Pracha Samasai Institute, Department of Disease Control
  • Boosbun Chua-Intra Office of the Senior Expert Committee, Department of Disease Control
  • Angkana Charoenwatanachokchi Office of the Senior Expert Committee, Department of Disease Control
  • Sasithorn Tangsawad Division of Non Communicable Diseases, Department of Disease Control
  • Wisut Saelim Raj Pracha Samasai Institute, Department of Disease Control
  • Kruatip Jantarathaneewat Division of AIDS and Sexual Transmitted Disease, Department of Disease Control
  • Chaweewan Klainak Division of AIDS and Sexual Transmitted Disease, Department of Disease Control
  • Naruemon Yenyarsan Division of AIDS and Sexual Transmitted Disease, Department of Disease Control
  • Visit Permdharmasin Division of Tuberculosis, Department of Disease Control
  • Prasit Thongsadayu Bankhai Hospital, Rayong Province

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14456/dcj.2021.1

Keywords:

integrated disease screening system, prisoners’ prevalent diseases, firstly admitted transfer and discharge

Abstract

The objective of this action research was to establish integrated screening system for diseases prevalent among prisoners at firstly admitted, transferred and discharged stages. Study areas were two prisons namely Chachoengsao and Rayong Prisons. The study was conducted in 4 phases: phase 1 analyzing the existing prisoner screening system; phase 2 drafting the screening system at firstly admitted, transferred and discharged stages; phase 3 implementing the system and phase 4 evaluation. Target groups were 48 officers consisted of prison commanders, prison officers, hospitals, executives and public health officers. Quantitative data was analyzed and presented by frequency and percentage. Qualitative data was validated by triangulation technique and analyzed by content analysis. It was found that both prisons were able to screen firstly admitted prisoners and transferred in accordance with new system at 100 percent and Both of them were able to screen discharged prisoners at 100 percent but they could not immediately release prisoners due to its large capacity. Majority of executive and staffs in prisons and related hospitals accepted all aspects of the integrated screening system at very satisfied and satisfied levels respectively. As this established screening system was developed based on the prisons' setting and the participation of all related local organizations, therefore; it should be validated for its efficiency, scale up in other prisons, and evaluated further.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Arjin Cholapand, Raj Pracha Samasai Institute, Department of Disease Control

M.D.,Dip.,Thai Board of of Plastic and,   Reconstructive Surgery, Board of Preventive Medicine)              

Nawiya Nuntapanich, Raj Pracha Samasai Institute, Department of Disease Control.

B.Sc.,M.Ed.,Ph.D.

Jumpol Tantivongsakij, Raj Pracha Samasai Institute, Department of Disease Control

M.D.,Dip.,Thai Board of Ophthaimology

References

Office of the Council of State. Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand B.E.2550. 1st ed. [Internet]. 2007 [cited 2017 Sep 1]. 1-127. Available from: https://www.ombudsman.go.th/10/documents/law/Constitution2550.pdf.

Medical Services Division, Department of Corrections. Morbidity and Mortality Statistics of inmates in prisons 2016.

Na Nakhorn R. Advantage and disadvantage of health screening. Journal of Health System Research. 2013;7(3):325-30.

MaiKaew T. Treatment for sick inmates in prison [thesis]. Nothaburi: Sukhothai Thammathirat Open University; 2011.

Union for Civil Liberty. Thai prison 2011. 1st ed. Bangkok: Master press; 2011.

Kannasut P. The prisoner’s right to healthcare [thesis]. Bangkok: Dhurakij Pundit University; 2014.

Suriart C, Rutchanagul P, Thonhbai W. Health perception, health behaviors and health service needs among inmates with metabolic disorders. Rama Nurs J. 2014;20:372-87.

Bureau of Health Administration, Office of the Permanent Secretary. Guideline to improve health service to inmates in prisons. 1st ed. Nonthaburi: Bureau of Health Administration; 2016.

Yoddumnern-Attig B, Tangchonlatip K. Analysis of qualitative data: Data management, Data interpretation and data meaning. 1st ed. Nakhon Pathom: Institute for Population and Social Research, Mahidol University; 2009.

The Secretariat of the House of Representatives. Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand B.E.2560. Bangkok: The Secretariat of the House of Representatives Publishing; 2017.

Department of ASEAN Affairs, Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Kingdom of Thailand. ASEAN Human Rights Declaration. 1st ed. [Internet]. 2013 [cited 2017 Sep 1]. 1-27. Available from: http://www.mfa.go.th/asean/contents/files/asea n-media-center-20130614-163951-210860.pdf.

Watanasirichaigul S. 6 Pillars of health system. Health System Research Institute [Internet]. 2014 [cited 2018 Feb.7]. 1-27. Available from: https://www.hsri.or.th/researcher/media/issue/detail/5440. 1-3.

Downloads

Published

2021-03-31

How to Cite

1.
Cholapand N, ์Nuntapanich N, Tantivongsakij J, Chua-Intra B, Charoenwatanachokchi A, Tangsawad S, Saelim W, Jantarathaneewat K, Klainak C, Yenyarsan N, Permdharmasin V, Thongsadayu P. The development of the integrated screening system for diseases prevalent among prisoner–inmates: first admitted, transferred and discharged. Dis Control J [Internet]. 2021 Mar. 31 [cited 2024 Dec. 19];47(1):1-12. Available from: https://he01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/DCJ/article/view/244125

Issue

Section

Original Article