Evaluation of NCD Clinic Plus in 2019, Health Region 5 in Public Hospitals under Ministry of Public Health

Authors

  • Chutatip Chompoonuch The Office of Disease Prevention and Control, Region 5 Ratchaburi
  • Isaraphong Perdpern The Office of Disease Prevention and Control, Region 5 Ratchaburi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14456/dcj.2021.27

Keywords:

Evaluation of CIPP Model, NCD Clinic Plus

Abstract

The purpose of this study “ the evaluation of  NCD Clinic Plus in 2019, Health Region 5 Under in Public Hospitals under Ministry of Public Health” had the objective  toevaluate Context, Input, Process and Output of the project according to Stufflebeam's CIPP Assessment Model. Data and Information were collected by questionnaires which were given to 2 groups, 219 sample, consisting of a team NCD Clinic Plus Quality Evaluators in 2019, 7 person, and  groups of  NCD Clinic Plus Quality Participants from public hospitals under Health Region 5, 212 persons from May 1, 2019 to June 28, 2019. The analysis was based on the results of statistical methods by using Weighted Averages, Standard Deviation,  Frequency and Percentage, For Open-Ended questions, analyzed based on Content Analysis and Analytic Induction can be summarized as follows: the overall project evaluation after all operations is at a High level which ranked in order from highest to lowest, as Product ( = 4.61, S.D.= 0.533) with the highest mean, followed by Context ( = 4.40, S.D.= 0.525) Process ( = 4.34, S.D.= 0.536) and  Input ( = 3.54, S.D.= 0.763). In order to NCD Clinic Plus Quality Participants, the overall project evaluation after all operations is at high level which can be   ranked in order from highest to lowest, as Context ( = 4.17, S.D.= 0.580), having the highest mean, followed by Product ( = 4.06, S.D.= 0.555), Process  ( = 3.87, S.D. = 0.566), and Input ( = 3.79, S.D. = 0.642). The results of The evaluation of the NCD Clinic Plus of Public Health Facilities of health Region 5 under the Ministry of Public Health in 2019 Project, are outstanding in many areas, such as the implementation of the project created good tracing characteristics, assessed the person who responsible of the chronic non-communicable diseases work and the atmosphere of the quality assessment was friendly from  the excellent assessment of Empowerment. The quality should be maintained. At the same time, plans should be made to close the problem gap on issues to cover  the lowest evaluation in each area as well.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Chutatip Chompoonuch, The Office of Disease Prevention and Control, Region 5 Ratchaburi

The purpose of this study “ the evaluation of NCD Clinic Plus in 2019, Health Region 5 Under in Public Hospitals under Ministry of Public Health” had the objective toevaluate Context, Input, Process and Output of the project according to Stufflebeam's CIPP Assessment Model. Data and Information were collected by questionnaires which were given to 2 groups, 219 sample, consisting of a team NCD Clinic Plus Quality Evaluators in 2019, 7 person, and groups of NCD Clinic Plus Quality Participants from public hospitals under Health Region 5, 212 persons from May 1, 2019 to June 28, 2019. The analysis was based on the results of statistical methods by using Weighted Averages, Standard Deviation, Frequency and Percentage, For Open-Ended questions, analyzed based on Content Analysis and Analytic Induction can be summarized as follows: the overall project evaluation after all operations is at a High level which ranked in order from highest to lowest, as Product (x ̅= 4.61, S.D.= 0.533) with the highest mean, followed by Context (x ̅= 4.40, S.D.= 0.525) Process (x ̅= 4.34, S.D.= 0.536) and Input (x ̅= 3.54, S.D.= 0.763). In order to NCD Clinic Plus Quality Participants, the overall project evaluation after all operations is at high level which can be ranked in order from highest to lowest, as Context (x ̅= 4.17, S.D.= 0.580), having the highest mean, followed by Product (x ̅= 4.06, S.D.= 0.555), Process (x ̅= 3.87, S.D. = 0.566), and Input (x ̅= 3.79, S.D. = 0.642). The results of The evaluation of the NCD Clinic Plus of Public Health Facilities of health Region 5 under the Ministry of Public Health in 2019 Project, are outstanding in many areas, such as the implementation of the project created good tracing characteristics, assessed the person who responsible of the chronic non-communicable diseases work and the atmosphere of the quality assessment was friendly from the excellent assessment of Empowerment. The quality should be maintained. At the same time, plans should be made to close the problem gap on issues to cover the lowest evaluation in each area as well.

Isaraphong Perdpern, The Office of Disease Prevention and Control, Region 5 Ratchaburi

The purpose of this study “ the evaluation of NCD Clinic Plus in 2019, Health Region 5 Under in Public Hospitals under Ministry of Public Health” had the objective toevaluate Context, Input, Process and Output of the project according to Stufflebeam's CIPP Assessment Model. Data and Information were collected by questionnaires which were given to 2 groups, 219 sample, consisting of a team NCD Clinic Plus Quality Evaluators in 2019, 7 person, and groups of NCD Clinic Plus Quality Participants from public hospitals under Health Region 5, 212 persons from May 1, 2019 to June 28, 2019. The analysis was based on the results of statistical methods by using Weighted Averages, Standard Deviation, Frequency and Percentage, For Open-Ended questions, analyzed based on Content Analysis and Analytic Induction can be summarized as follows: the overall project evaluation after all operations is at a High level which ranked in order from highest to lowest, as Product (x ̅= 4.61, S.D.= 0.533) with the highest mean, followed by Context (x ̅= 4.40, S.D.= 0.525) Process (x ̅= 4.34, S.D.= 0.536) and Input (x ̅= 3.54, S.D.= 0.763). In order to NCD Clinic Plus Quality Participants, the overall project evaluation after all operations is at high level which can be ranked in order from highest to lowest, as Context (x ̅= 4.17, S.D.= 0.580), having the highest mean, followed by Product (x ̅= 4.06, S.D.= 0.555), Process (x ̅= 3.87, S.D. = 0.566), and Input (x ̅= 3.79, S.D. = 0.642). The results of The evaluation of the NCD Clinic Plus of Public Health Facilities of health Region 5 under the Ministry of Public Health in 2019 Project, are outstanding in many areas, such as the implementation of the project created good tracing characteristics, assessed the person who responsible of the chronic non-communicable diseases work and the atmosphere of the quality assessment was friendly from the excellent assessment of Empowerment. The quality should be maintained. At the same time, plans should be made to close the problem gap on issues to cover the lowest evaluation in each area as well.

References

Division of Non Communicable Disease. NCD Clinic Plus 2017 [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2019 Apr 5] Available from: http://www.thaincd.com/document/file/download/paper-manual/NCDClinicPlus2560.pdf

Division of Non Communicable Disease. Report of the Thai Health Survey by Physical Exam 2014 [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2019 Apr 5]. Available from: of the 5th Thai Health Survey by Physical Exam 2014_NHES_5 .pdf

Division of Non-Communicable Disease. NCD Clinic Plus 2019 [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2019 Mar 19]. Available from: https://issuu.com/agd2003/docs/e-book_ncd_clinic_plus____2562-new

Thummavedhikul A. Project evaluation [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2019 May 11]. Available from: https://panchalee.wordpress.com/2009/04/28/project-evaluation1/

Division of Non Communicable Disease. NCD Clinic Plus 2561 [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2019 Apr 5] Available from: http://www.thaincd.com/document/file/download/paper-manual/NCDClinicPlus2561 .pdf

Therawiwat M. Evaluation of the Health Education and Health Promotion Project [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2019 May 23]. Available from: https://www.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/muhed/article/view/174737/125084

Srisa-ard B. Interpretation when using the estimation scale collecting tool [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2019 Oct 7]. Available from: https://edu.msu.ac.th/jem/home/journal_file/63.pdf

Sanitlou N, Jiravicha P, Warunprapr W, Leelaprachakul M. The Evaluation of Student Development Project Using CIPP Model at Suvarnabhumi Institute of Technology Samutprakan Province [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2019 Oct 7]. Available from: http://journal.svit.ac.th/index.php/1/article/download/42/40/

Chaichompoo P, Rurob T. Project Evaluation of Disease Prevention and Control District Model Development of Public Health Region 14 in 2012 [Internet]. 2012 [cited 2019 Jun 3]. Available from: http://ryssurvey.com/vichakarn/ downloadq.php?f=ddc_201710121146111933_150_1001ca.pdf&fc=title%2057.pdf

Ruangdej Chaosuansreecharoen K, Akharawirawat T, Khongsanit S. Project Evaluation on the Health Promotion, Academic Development and Cultural Exchange Festival of Southern Nursing and Public Health College Network of 23rd [Internet]. 2000 [cited 2019 Oct 7]. Available from: http://www.kmutt.ac.th/jif/public_html/Download/Format_Checker/2/21.pdf

Yaemlamai N, Hongwiset S. Evaluation of a Health Promotion Program for the Elderly, TakhiantiaSub-district Municipality, Bang-lamung District, Chonburi Province [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2019 Dec 15]. Available from: https://www.tcithaijo.org/index.php/npuj/article/view/150297/112509

Downloads

Published

2021-06-27

How to Cite

1.
Chompoonuch C, Perdpern I. Evaluation of NCD Clinic Plus in 2019, Health Region 5 in Public Hospitals under Ministry of Public Health. Dis Control J [Internet]. 2021 Jun. 27 [cited 2024 Dec. 19];47(2):300-12. Available from: https://he01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/DCJ/article/view/242226

Issue

Vol. 47 No. 2 (2021): April-June

Section

Original Article

License

Articles published in the Disease Control Journal are considered as academic work, research or analysis of the personal opinion of the authors, not the opinion of the Thailand Department of Disease Control or editorial team. The authors must be responsible for their articles.