Diagnoses of work-relatedness: case studies


  • Thongsawaeng S Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok
  • Panumasvivat J Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok


work-relatedness, occupational disease, workmen’s compensation fund


The diagnosis of work-related disease is divided into two procedures. The first is the diagnosis of diseases and the second is the diagnosis to determine if it is caused by or related to work. The second procedure is difficult and complicated leading to the number of diagnosed cases lower than actuality. Therefore, it is necessary to use the epidemiology principle to support the diagnosis of work-relatedness. This article presents case studies of diagnosis of work-relatedness to serve as examples and suggestion for the physicians and Workmen’s Compensation Fund.


Download data is not yet available.


1. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. A guide to the work-relatedness of disease. Revised edition. USA: Center for Disease Control; 1979.
2. International Labour Organization. List of occupational diseases (revised 2010). Identification and recognition of occupational diseases: Criteria for incorporating diseases in the ILO list of occupational diseases. Geneva: International Labour Office; 2010.
3. Greaves WW, Das R, McKenzie JG, Sinclair DC, 2nd, Hegmann KT. Work-relatedness. J Occup Environ Med. 2018;60:e640-6.
4. Workmen’s compensation ACT, B.E. 1994.
5. Ministry of Labour. Notification of the Ministry of Labour: diseases that occur at work or because of the nature or type of work. Bangkok: Ministry of Labour; 2007. (in thai)
6. Social Security Office. Diagnostic criteria of occupational diseases commemorative edition on theauspiciuos occasion of his Majesty the King’s 80th Birthday Anniversary. Bangkok: Ministry of Labour; 2007.
7. International labour Organization. Global trends on occupational accidents and diseases. 2015.
8. Social Security Office. Situation of work-relatedness disease and injury, B.E. 2015-2019. Nonthaburi: Social Security Office; 2019.
9. Division of Tuberculosis. Latent tuberculosis infection. Thailand: Department of Disease Control. Nonthaburi: Ministry of Public Health; 2019.
10. Hegmann KT, Oostema SJ. Causal associations and determination of work-relatedness. In: Melhorn JM, editor. AMA guides to the Evaluation of Disease and Injury Causation. Chicago: IL; 2014. p. 105.
11. Industrial Injuries Advisory Council. Deciding which diseases should be covered by Industrial Injuries Disablement Benefit (IIDB): Some frequently asked questions. UK: Department for Work and Pensions; 2015.
12. Parascandola M, Weed DL, Dasgupta A. Two surgeon general’s reports on smoking and cancer: a historical investigation of the practice of causal inference. Emerg Themes Epidemiol. 2006;3:1.
13. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Guidelines for the investigation of contacts of persons with infectious tuberculosis; Recommendations from the national tuberculosis controllers association and CDC. USA: MMWR; 2005.



How to Cite

S T, J P. Diagnoses of work-relatedness: case studies . Chiang Mai Med J. [Internet]. 2021 Oct. 1 [cited 2022 May 25];60(4):823-30. Available from: https://he01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/CMMJ-MedCMJ/article/view/253985



Review Article