Occupational health literacy among health workers in a hospital under the Bangkok Metropolitan Administration

Authors

  • Chawakitchareon V Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok
  • Sithisarankul P Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok
  • Hengpraprom S Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok

Keywords:

occupational health literacy, health workers, occupational health in hospital

Abstract

Objectives To investigate occupational health literacy level and associated factors among health workers in a hospital under the Bangkok Metropolitan Administration.

Methods This research is a cross-sectional descriptive study. The samples, obtained from stratified sampling, were 415 health workers. Occupational health literacy was assessed by the self-administered questionnaire, The occupational health literacy scale for health workers, which has been adjusted and validated by content validity and reliability. Data were analyzed with descriptive statistics and multiple linear regression analysis.

Results The sample group had a moderate level of occupational health literacy with an average score 130.34 ± 15.79 (95%CI: 128.82-131.86) or 72.41 percent. The highest score was managing self-occupational health (74.53 percent) and the lowest score was occupational health communication skills (67.27 percent). Factors significantly associated with good occupational health literacy were female (p = 0.011), aged below 45 (p < 0.001), no shift work or overtime (p = 0.029), history of occupational health training (p = 0.002), occupational health and safety policy perception (p < 0.001) and adequate occupational health and safety support, by high support (p < 0.001) and low support (p = 0.023).

Conclusions The promotion of occupational health literacy among health workers should focus on occupational health communication skills, providing appropriated occupational health services to each group of occupation, increasing occupational health training, establishing occupational health and safety policy, and allocating support. To enable health workers to develop health workers’ competencies in occupational health practice for work safety and effectiveness.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. World Health Organization. Health literacy the solid facts. World Health Organization [Internet]. 2013 [cited 2020 Oct 24]. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/326432.
2. Nutbeam D. Defining, measuring and improving health literacy. HEP 2015;42:450-6.
3. Nutbeam D. The evolving concept of health literacy. Soc Sci Med. 2008;67:2072-8.
4. Prime Minister’s Office. The national reform plans B.E. 2561 (A.D. 2018). Royal Gazette 2018;135 (Pt 24 k) dated 6 April B.E. 2018. (in Thai)
5. Ministry of Public Health. Health promotion and evaluation of health literacy and health behavior [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2021 Jan 14]. Available from: http://www.hed.go.th/linkhed/file/575. (in Thai)
6. Rauscher KJ, Myers DJ. Occupational health literacy and work-related injury among US adolescents. Int J Inj Contr Saf Promot. 2014; 21:81-9.
7. Tantranont K, Songkham W, Suthakorn W, Srisuphan W, Sakarinkul P, Dhatsuwan J. Development of a scale to measure occupational health and safety literacy scale among industrial workers. Journal of The Royal Thai Army Nurses. 2019;20:247-55. (in Thai)
8. Namthep W. Factors influencing of occupational health literacy among international migrant workers in Rayong province. Journal of Public Health Nursing. 2018;32:115-32. (in Thai)
9. Kongsombatsuk M, Polyong C, Rittideah D. Occupational halth literacy affecting work-related disease and injury prevention behaviors among industrial workers. Journal of Medicine and Public Health, Ubon Ratchathani Univers. 2020;3:112-20. (in Thai)
10. Polyong C, Rittideah D, Kongsombatsuk M, Praisuthisut K, Samanusron K. Validation of the occupational health literacy test for industrial workforce. Journal of Safety and Health. 2020;13:140-57. (in Thai)
11. The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). Healthcare workers. [Internet]. [cited 2020 Nov 22]. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/topics/healthcare/default.html.
12. Joseph B, Joseph M. The health of the healthcare workers. Indian J Occup Environ Med. 2016;20:71-2.
13. Prüss-Üstün A, Rapiti E, Hutin YJ. Sharps injuries: global burden of disease from sharps injuries to health-care workers: Geneva: WHO Document Production Services; 2003.
14. World Health Organization. Global atlas of the health workforce [Internet]. 2008 [cited 2021 Jan 18]. Available from: https://www.who.int/healthinfo/systems/WHO_MBHSS_2010_section2_web.pdf.
15. Taber KS. The use of Cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Res Sci Educ. 2018;48:1273-96.
16. Intarakamhang U. Final report of Creating and Developing of Thailand Health Literacy Scales [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2021 Jan 27]. Available from: http://bsris.swu.ac.th/upload/268335.pdf. (in Thai)
17. Intarakamhang U. Development of health literacy. In: Intarakamhang U, editor. Health literacy: measurement and development. Bangkok: Sukhumvit printing; 2017. p. 77-103. (in Thai)
18. Kaeodumkoeng K. Development of health literacy. In: Kaeodumkoeng K, editor. Health literacy: access, understand and application. Bangkok: Amarin; 2018. p. 1-22. (in Thai)
19. Lee HY, Lee J, Kim NK. Gender differences in health literacy among Korean adults: do women have a higher level of health literacy than men? Am J Mens Health. 2015;9:370-9.
20. Lippe E, Rattay P. Health-risk behaviour of women and men-differences according to partnership and parenthood. results of the German health update (GEDA) Survey 2009–2010. In: Doblhammer G, Guma J, editors. A demographic perspective on gender, family and health in Europe. Cham: Springer; 2018. p. 233-61.
21. Yusida H, Suwandi T, Yusuf A, Sholihah Q. Relationship individual factors with occupational health literacy (observational study on industrial workers of Sasirangan in South Kalimantan). International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications. 2017;6:481-4.
22. Sun X, Shi Y, Zeng Q, Wang Y, Du W, Wei N, et al. Determinants of health literacy and health behavior regarding infectious respiratory diseases: a pathway model. BMC Public Health. 2013;13:261.
23. Siriruttanapruk S. Occupational health services for aging workers [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2021 Jun 7]. Available from: http://envocc.ddc.moph.go.th/uploads/ประชุม/24_08_59/8.1a.pptx. (in Thai)
24. Ekpanyaskul C. Workers and health. In: Ekpanyaskul C. Principle of occupational medicine for preventive medicine & public health. Bangkok: Jaransanitwong printing, 2018. p 1-38. (in Thai)
25. Çelikkalp Ü, Dilek F. Factors affecting the occupational accident rates among nurses. Rev Rsc Enferm USP. 2019;53:1-8.
26. Sukpromson R. Incidence of work-related injury of professional nurses in Phayao hospital, Phayao. Nursing Journal of the Ministry of Public Health. 2560;27:107-19. (in Thai)
27. Matsee C, Waratwichit C. Promotion of health literacy: from concept to practice. Boromarajonani College of Nursing, Uttaradit Journal. 2017;9:96-110. (in Thai)
28. Chongchitpaisan W, Bandhukul A, Sithisarankul P. Occupational health practice for healthcare workers compared to hospital accreditation criteria in Thai governmental hospital, 2004. Journal of Medicine and Health Sciences. 2006;13:234-47. (in Thai)
29. Alli BO. Key principles in occupational health and safety. In: Alli BO, editor. Fundamental principles of occupational health and safety. Second edition. Geneva: ILO; 2008. p. 17-22.
30. Bandhukul A, Chongchitpaisan W. Occupational health service in hospital. In: Bandhukul A, editors. Textbook of occupational medicine. Bangkok: Department of Corrections press; 2011. p. 73-110. (in Thai)

Published

2021-10-01

How to Cite

1.
V C, P S, S H. Occupational health literacy among health workers in a hospital under the Bangkok Metropolitan Administration. Chiang Mai Med J. [Internet]. 2021 Oct. 1 [cited 2022 May 25];60(4):599-613. Available from: https://he01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/CMMJ-MedCMJ/article/view/253942

Issue

Section

Original Article